Abstract
The chapter bridges two approaches for the assessment of national innovation performance based on the European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS) composite indicators and on the analysis of factors that may be behind these indicators. The main focus of the study is on analyzing innovation performance of the Baltic States – the small countries that have similar post-socialist path dependence. Our aim is to explore what factors have been most influential in developing the different innovation performance of the countries and whether the innovation measurement indicators also capture these differences. Our analysis shows that remarkable measuring problems are the inability to sufficiently capture the quality of human capital, the small economy effect, that is, high dependence on single enterprises of a sector, and data availability issues. Some self-reporting indicators may also bias the measurement results. Still, Estonian innovation performance seems to be ahead of the other two Baltic countries; the main impulses have been successful attraction of foreign investments and the Estonian tax policy, and also possible positive spillover effects from the Nordic neighborhood, particularly from Finland and Sweden.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allik, J. (2008). Quality of Estonian science estimated through bibliometric indicators (1997–2007). Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, 57(4), 255–264.
Archibugi, D., & Sirilli, G. (2001). The direct measurement of technological innovation in business. In. B. Thuriaux, E. Arnold, C. Couchot (Eds.), Innovation and enterprise creation: Statistics and indicators (pp. 38–49). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Archibugi, D., Denni, M., Filippetti, A. (2009). The technological capabilities of nations: The state of the art of synthetic indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 917–931.
Arundel, A., Bordoy, B., Mohnen, P., Smith, K. (2008). Innovation surveys and policy: Lessons from the CIS, In C. Nauwelaers, & R. Wintjes (Eds.), Innovation policy in Europe: Measurement and strategy (pp. 3–28.) Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Arundel, A., & Hollanders, H. (2008). Innovation scoreboards: Indicators and policy use. In C. Nauwelaers, & R. Wintjes (Eds.), Innovation policy in Europe: Measurement and strategy (pp. 29–52). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Dombrovsky, V. (2009). Is anything wrong with higher education in Latvia? Baltic Journal of Economics, 9(2), 5–24.
Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (Eds.) (2008). Small country innovation systems: Globalisation, change and policy in Asia and Europe. Cheltenham UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Estonian Development Fund (2008). The current status and future outlooks of competitiveness of Estonian economy: Estonia in focus. Tallinn: Estonian Development Fund, 68 pp.
Eurostat (2010). Eurostat database: Economy and finance, National accounts; Population and social conditions: education and training. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu. Accessed 21 February 2011.
Fagerberg, J. (2005). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 1–26). Oxford, UK, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37, 1417–1435.
Grupp, H., & Schubert, T. (2010). Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance, Research Policy, 39, 67–78.
Heinlo, A. (2009). Innovation scoreboard: Estonia’s advantages and shortcomings. Quarterly Bulletin of Statistics Estonia, 1, 50–57.
Hollanders, H., & Arundel, A. (2007). Differences in socio-economic conditions and regulatory environment explaining variation in national innovation performance and policy implications. INNO-Metrics Thematic Paper. UNU-MERIT. Maastricht.
Hollanders, H., & van Cruysen, A. (2008). Rethinking the European Innovation Scoreboard: A new methodology for 2008–2010. INNO-Metrics. UNU-MERIT. Maastricht.
IAREG (2008). Report on traditional and new indicators of Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) and knowledge accumulation. A report of IAREG research under EC Seventh Framework Programme.
Innometrics (2005). European Innovation Scoreboard 2004: Comparative analysis of innovation performance. http://www.proinno-europe.eu/sites/default/files/page/10/07/eis_2004.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2011.
Innometrics (2006). European Innovation Scoreboard 2005: Comparative analysis of innovation performance. http://www.proinno-europe.eu/sites/default/files/page/10/07/EIS_2005.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2011.
Innometrics (2007). European Innovation Scoreboard 2006: Comparative analysis of innovation performance. http://www.proinno-europe.eu/page/doc/EIS2006_final.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2011.
Innometrics (2008). European Innovation Scoreboard 2007: Comparative analysis of innovation performance. http://www.proinno-europe.eu/page/admin/uploaded_documents/European_Innovation_Scoreboard_2007.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2011.
Innometrics (2009). European Innovation Scoreboard 2008. http://www.proinno-europe.eu/page/admin/uploaded_documents/EIS2008_Final_report-pv.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2011.
Kristapsons, J., Martinson, H., Dagyte, I. (2003). Baltic R&D systems in transition. Experiences and future prospects. Zinatne: Academic Publishers, 203 pp.
Landry, R., Amara, N., Lamari, M. (2002). Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 69, 681–701.
Marinova, D., & Phillimore, J. (2003). Models of innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 44–53). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Masso, J., Roolaht, T., Varblane, U. (2010). Foreign direct investment and innovation in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from Estonia. University of Tartu Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper, 67.
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Statistical Working Papers, 2005/3. OECD Publishing.
Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51–67.
Schibany, A., & Streicher, G. (2008). The European Innovation Scoreboard: Drowning by numbers? Science and Public Policy, 35(10), 717–732.
Smith, K. (2005). Measuring Innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 148–177). Oxford, UK, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Vahter, P. (2010). Does FDI spur innovation, productivity and knowledge sourcing by incumbent firms? Evidence from manufacturing industry in Estonia. University of Tartu Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper, 69.
Acknowledgments
The authors of the chapter are grateful to the Estonian Ministry of Education and Science (grant No. SF0180037s08) and the Estonian Science Foundation (research grant No. 7756) for their financial support. We are also thankful for valuable feedback and comments we got from our colleagues during the seminars and discussions that took place within the period in which we prepared this book. Our particular thanks belong to Jaan Masso and Priit Vahter for their stimulating suggestions that remarkably helped us in smoothing the last version of this chapter. Views expressed in the chapter are solely those of the authors and, as such, should not be attributed to other parties.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paas, T., Poltimäe, H. (2012). Innovation Measurement Problems: An Illustrative Case of the Baltic Countries. In: Carayannis, E., Varblane, U., Roolaht, T. (eds) Innovation Systems in Small Catching-Up Economies. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, vol 15. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1548-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1548-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1547-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1548-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)