The Effect of Project Based Web 2.0-Learning on Students’ Outcomes
Web 2.0 technologies are a potential tool for supporting informal learning in academic research practices that may enrich learning performance and learners’ attitudes. Thus, understanding informal learning in academic research activities is a critical issue. The present chapter investigates learners’ performance and attitude toward community-based project management learning system. Data has been collected from post-graduate learners in a specific education faculty, the Menofia University in Egypt. Accordingly, the study found no significant differences between online and offline groups into project performance (writing, presenting, and social activities). However, the study found significant differences between online and offline groups’ attitude towards academic research web-based activities. Participatory media and Web 2.0 technologies play an important role to enhance and promote learners’ attitudes towards research tasks and activities.
KeywordsKnowledge Management Attitude Scale Informal Learning Content Management System Postgraduate Learner
- Amin, U. (2007). Statistical analysis by using SPSS, Academic Bookshop, 2nd print, Cairo.Google Scholar
- Ardaiz-Villanueva, O., et al. (2010). Evaluation of computer tools for idea generation and team formation in project-based learning, Computers & Education, 1–12.Google Scholar
- Augustsson, G. (2010). Web2.0 pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students, Internet and Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Bakker, R.M., et al. (2010). Managing the project learning paradox: A set-theoretic approach toward project knowledge transfer, International Journal of Project Management.Google Scholar
- Bevarly, D. (2009). Maslow 2.0 – A New Hierarchy of Needs for Collaboration. Retrieved 21.01.2011 from Weblog: (http://www.aheadofideas.com/?p=156).
- Lai, Y.C. & Ng, E.M.W. (2010). Using wikis to develop student teachers’ learning, teaching, and assessment capabilities, Internet and Higher Education, 2010.Google Scholar
- Learning Approaches & Technologies: The CALT Perspective. The Center for Advanced Learning Technologies, Web Site, retrieved on February 27, 2010, from http://www.insead.fr/CALT/Publication/CALTReport/calt-perspective.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Milentijevic, I. et al. (2008). Version control in Project-based Learning, Computer & Education 50, 1331–1338.Google Scholar
- Mohamed, B, Köhler, T.(2009). Learning management systems as tool for community-based project management. In: Meißner, K. & Engelien, M.: Virtuelle Organisation und Neue Medien (2009).Google Scholar
- Turner, Fred. (2006). From counterculture to cyber culture: Steward Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- UNESCO (2007). Report on the implementation of the Promotion and Use of Multilingualism and Universal Access to Cyberspace. Retrieved 16.01.11 from http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/files/26047/12041267483EGYPTE.pdf/EGYPTE.pdf.
- Uzunboylu, H., Bicen, H. & Cavus, N. (2010). The efficient virtual learning environment: A case study of web2.0 tools and windows live spaces, Computers & Education.Google Scholar
- Wertenbroch, A. & Nabeth, T. (2000). Advanced Learning Approaches & Technologies: The CALT Perspective. The Center for Advanced Learning Technologies, Web Site, retrieved on February 27, 2010, from http://www.insead.fr/CALT/Publication/CALTReport/calt-perspective.pdf.
- WiseGEEK (2010). what is a scoring rubric, Web Site, retrieved on June 13, 2010, from http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-scoring-rubric.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar