Toward Child-Friendly Output and Fabrication Devices

The StringPrinter and Other Possibilities
  • Michael EisenbergEmail author
  • Kyle Ludwig
  • Nwanua Elumeze


Computer-controlled fabrication – the design and “printing” of tangible, physical objects – has seen an explosion of interest and excitement in the past several years. Three-dimensional printers, laser cutters, paper-cutting devices, computer-controlled sewing machines, milling machines, and the like have become increasingly affordable, and now permit users to create a remarkable range of physical objects in a wide array of materials. Strangely, however, this “explosion” has thus far largely ignored the remarkable potential of physical production and fabrication by children. This is a surprising oversight. After all, children’s crafts – the landscape of activities and materials that have traditionally been associated with educational construction – represent fertile ground for experimentation with novel, innovative computer-controlled fabrication devices and materials. This chapter describes a number of imaginative possibilities for such devices, blending the most expressive and content-rich aspects of children’s crafts with the powerful affordances of computer-controlled fabrication. As an example, we describe one “home-grown” prototype device, StringPrinter, designed for creating custom-decorated lengths of yarn and string for children’s craft projects. StringPrinter is not the exclusive focus of this chapter, but rather an illustration of a more general idea: it represents one (still-early) step in a much broader research agenda of creating fabrication hardware, software, and web-based systems for use by children. We use this example as a foundation for exploring much broader questions in the enhancement of children’s craft activities.


Fabrication Device Inkjet Printer Output Device Paper Tape Plastic Straw 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This chapter is a substantially extended version of (Ludwig et al. 2010). The work described here was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under award no. IIS0856003. Thanks also to Ted Chen, Ann Eisenberg, Gerhard Fischer, Mark Gross, Clayton Lewis, and Andee Rubin for wonderful conversations on the subject of this paper. Jeff LaMarche constructed the “vase” at left of Fig. 18.4, and invented the original idea of a “3D bead printer”. The vase at right of Fig. 18.4 was constructed by Jane Meyers and the first author. The paper-tape-printer is the work of Russell Winkler, Mossaab Bagdouri, Susan Hendrix, and Michael Coury.


  1. Anderson, C. [2008] The Long Tail (Revised edition.) New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, R. et al. [2010] Preliminary considerations regarding use of digital fabrication to incorporate engineering design principles in elementary mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), pp. 167–172.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, G. [2008] The Boys’ Book of Survival. Buster Books, London, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Cundy, H. M. and Rollett, A. P. [1961] Mathematical Models. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Eisenberg, M. [2002] Output devices, computation, and the future of computational crafts. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(1), pp. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisenberg, M. [2011] Educational fabrication, in and out of the classroom. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE 2011), pp. 884–891.Google Scholar
  7. Gershenfeld, N. [2005] Fab. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Lipson, H. and Kurman, M. [2010] Factory@Home: the emerging economy of personal fabrication. Whitehouse Office of Science and Technology Policy. Available at:
  9. Ludwig, K.; Elumeze, N.; and Eisenberg, M. [2010] “The StringPrinter: First Steps Toward Child-Friendly Fabrication Devices” (reflection paper). In Proceedings of IADIS Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2010), Timisoara, Romania, pp. 300–302.Google Scholar
  10. Malone, E. and Lipson, H. [2007] Fab@Home: the personal desktop fabricator kit. Rapid Prototyping Journal 13:4, pp. 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Millington, J. [2004] Curve Stitching. Norfolk, UK: Tarquin Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Noss, R. and Hoyles, C. [2006] Exploring mathematics through construction and collaboration. In Sawyer, K. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 389–405.Google Scholar
  13. Papert, S. [1991] Situating constructionism. In Harel, I. and Papert, S. (eds.) Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: AblexGoogle Scholar
  14. Pohl, V. [1986] How to Enrich Geometry Using String Designs. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  15. Wigg, P. and Hasselschwert, J. [2001] A Handbook of Arts and Crafts. (10th edition) New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Winsor, H. H. [1915] The Boy Mechanic, Book 2. Chicago: Popular Mechanics Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Eisenberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kyle Ludwig
    • 1
  • Nwanua Elumeze
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations