Online Discussion Forum as a Means of Peer Support
Today, information and communication technology has spread into our workplaces and living surroundings. In other words, the development of pervasive and ubiquitous Internet enables people to connect to services in places it was not possible a few years ago. This paper analyses and discusses social media as a means of peer support in www-based discussion forums that enable newspaper readers express their opinions and arguments in the media. At the time of swine flu approaching the country, we examined how the readers discussed the intriguing topic. During the study period, altogether 1,361 comments were given. The results reveal that people want to be heard or read and that they also seem to be eager to comfort each other.
KeywordsDiscussion forum Peer support Social media
All those totally anonymous correspondents who openly posted their comments into the online discussion forum are acknowledged. The earlier version of this article was presented in the 3rd International Conference on Well-being in the Information Society and the fruitful comments of those present are warmly thanked.
- Biocca, F., & Levy, M. R. (1995). Communication applications of virtual reality. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 127–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Carter, K. A. (2003). Type me how you feel: Quasi-nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 60(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
- Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B., & Underwood, L. G. (2000). Social relationships and health. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 3–25). Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cowie, H., & Wallace, P. (2000). Peer support in action: From bystanding to standing by (pp. 1–22). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fisher, J., Mowrey, H., & Nardecchia, T. (2006). Computer mediated communication and the virtual community, Chapter 6, In Department of Communication, Yearbook 2006 (Vol. 1, pp. 104–121).Google Scholar
- Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 1, No. 2. Available at: http://qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-e/2-00inhalt-e.htm
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Murphy, L. J., & Mitchell, D. L. (1998). When writing helps to heal: E-mail as therapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 26(1), 21–32.Google Scholar
- Porter, C. E. (2004). A typology of virtual communities: A multi-disciplinary foundation for future research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), Article 3.Google Scholar
- Silverman, D. (2000). Analyzing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 821–834). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar