Comparative Psychology Versus Ethology

  • Richard H. Yahner
Chapter

Abstract

As humans, we consistently judge the behavior of animals (e.g., that pet is cute) or fellow humans (e.g., that new neighbor is friendly, etc.) based on their appearance and how they act from our perspective. In other words, we seldom look at the ecology of a pet or human or, for that matter, of an animal in the wild. In contrast, wildlife managers typically look at the ecology of an animal or view the animal as being part of a population; management of a species is based on populations rather than on individuals; wildlife management classically focused on populations, habitat, and people (Giles 1978).

Keywords

Rubber Canis Felis Cute Anthranilate 

References

  1. Barash DP (1977) Sociobiology and behavior. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 378 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer GB (2005) Research training for releasable animals. Conserv Biol 19:1779–1789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertram CRB (1978) Living in groups. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA, pp 64–96Google Scholar
  4. Blumstein DT, Fernández-Juricic E (2004) The emergence of conservation behavior. Conserv Biol 5:1175–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conover M (1999) Can waterfowl be taught to avoid food handouts through conditioned food aversions? Wildl Soc Bull 27:160–166Google Scholar
  6. Conover M, Pitt WC, Kessler KK, DuBow TJ, Sanborn WA (1995) Review of data on human injuries, illnesses, and economic losses caused by wildlife in the United States. Wildl Soc Bull 23:407–414Google Scholar
  7. Cooper CA, Neff AJ, Poon DP, Smith GR (2008) Behavioral responses of eastern gray squirrels in suburban habitats differing in human activity levels. Northeast Nat 15:619–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eibel-Eibesfeldt I (1970) Ethology: the biology of behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 530 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Giles RH Jr (1978) Wildlife management. W.H. Freeman and Co, San Francisco, CA, 416 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Herrero S, Smith T, DeFruyn TD, Gunther K, Matt CA (2005) From the field: brown bear habituation to people—safety, risks, and benefits. Wildl Soc Bull 33:362–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehrman DS (1970) Semantic and conceptual issues in the nature–nuture problem. In: Aronson LA, Tobach E, Lehrman DS, Rosenblatt JS (eds) Development and evolution of behavior: essays in honor of T.C. Schneirla. W.H. Freeman and Co, San Francisco, CA, pp 17–52Google Scholar
  12. Martin K (1998) The role of animal behavior studies in wildlife science and management. Wildl Soc Bull 26:911–920Google Scholar
  13. Pavlov I (1927) The conditioned reflex. Oxford Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Thorndike EI (1898) Animal intelligence: an experimental study of the associative process in animals. Psychol Monogr 2:1–109Google Scholar
  15. Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Z Tierpsychol 20:410–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weaver HW, Anderson JT, Edwards JW, Dotson TL (2004) Black bear response to physical and auditory conditioning techniques in southern West Virginia. Northeast Wildl 58:23–33Google Scholar
  17. Wilcox BA, Murphy DD (1985) Conservation strategy: the effect of fragmentation on extinction. Am Nat 125:879–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yahner RH (2000) Eastern deciduous forest: ecology and wildlife conservation, 2nd edn. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  19. Yahner RH, Mahan CG (1997) Behavioral considerations in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 11:569–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yahner RH, Mahan CG (2002) Animal behavior in fragmented landscapes. In: Gutzwiller KJ (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York, pp 266–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard H. Yahner
    • 1
  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations