Advertisement

Nonlinearity in an Electromechanical Braking System

Development of a Smart Caliper
Chapter

Abstract

In electromechanical brakes, central controllers require accurate information about the clamp force between brake pad and disc as a function of pad displacement. This function is usually denoted as characteristic curve of the caliper. In a typical electromechanical braking system, clamp force measurements vary with actuator displacements in a hysteretic manner. Due to ageing, temperature and other environmental variations, the hysteretic characteristic curve of calliper varies with time. Therefore, automatic caliper calibration in real time is vital for high-performance braking action and vehicle safety. Due to memory and processing power limitations, the calibration technique should be memory efficient and of low computational complexity. This chapter investigates the hysteresis as a nonlinear effect in the electromechanical brakes, and describes a technique to parametrically model this effect. This technique is a simple and memory-efficient real-time calibration method in which a Maxwell-slip model is fitted to the data samples around each hysteresis cycle. Experimental results from the data recorded in various temperatures show that this technique results in clamp force measurements with less than 0. 7% error over the range of clamp force variations. It is also shown that by using these measurements, the characteristic curve can be accurately calibrated in real time.

Keywords

Hysteresis Model Hysteresis Cycle Central Control Unit Clamp Force Brake Caliper 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Hoseinnezhad R (2006) Position sensing in by-wire brake callipers using resolvers. IEEE Trans Vehicular Tech 55(3):924–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoseinnezhad R, Bab-Hadiashar A (2005) Missing data compensation for safety-critical components in a drive-by-wire system. IEEE Trans Vehicular Tech 54(4):1304–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoseinnezhad R, Bab-Hadiashar A (2006) Calibration of resolver sensors in electro-mechanical braking systems: a modified recursive weighted least squares approach. IEEE Trans Indust Elect 54(2):1052–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoseinnezhad R, Bab-Hadiashar A (2006) Fusion of redundant information in brake-by-wire systems, using a fuzzy voter. J. Adv Inform Fusion (JAIF) 1(1):35–45Google Scholar
  5. Hoseinnezhad R, Bab-Hadiashar A, Rocco T (2008) Real-time clamp force measurement in electro-mechanical brake calipers. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol 57(2):770–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoseinnezhad R, Bab-Hadiashar A (2009) Recent patents on measurement and estimation in brake-by-wire technology. Recent Patents Elect Eng 2(1):54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hsu JT, Ngo KDT (1997) A hammerstein-based dynamic model for hysteresis phenomenon. IEEE Trans Power Electron 12(3):406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonner W, Winner H, Dreilich L, Schunck E (1996) Electrohydraulic brake system – the first approach to brake-by-wire technology. SAE Technical Paper 960991Google Scholar
  9. Li C, Tan Y (2004) Adaptive control based on neural estimation for systems with unknown hysteresis. Proceedings of IEEE conference on control applications, Taipei, Taiwan, pp 1509–1514Google Scholar
  10. Oh J, Padthe AK, Bernstein DS, Rizos DD, Fassois SD (2005) Duhem models for hysteresis in sliding and presliding friction. Proceedings of the 44th IEEE conference on decision and control, and the European control conference 2005, Seville, Spain, pp 8132–8137Google Scholar
  11. Park K, Heo SJ (2004) A study on the brake-by-wire system using hardware-in-the-loop simulation. Int J Vehicle Des 36(1):38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rooks O, Armbruster M, Buchli S, Sulzmann A, Spiegelberg G, Kiencke U (2003) Redundancy management for drive-by-wire computer systems. Lecture notes in computer sciences 2788 – The 22nd international conference on computer safety, reliability and security, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 249–262Google Scholar
  13. Saric S, Bab-Hadiashar A, Hoseinnezhad R (2006) A sensor fusion approach to estimate clamp force in brake-by-wire systems. Proceedings of IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technical Conference (VTC’2006), Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. Saric S, Bab-Hadiashar A, Hoseinnezhad R (2008) Clamp-force estimation for a brake-by-wire system: a sensor-fusion approach. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol 57(2):778–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schenk DE, Wells RL, Miller JE (1995) Intelligent braking for current and future vehicles. SAE Technical Paper 950762Google Scholar
  16. Schwarz R, Isermann R, Bohm J, Nell J, Rieth P (1998) Modelling and control of an electromechanical disk brake. SAE Technical Paper 980600Google Scholar
  17. Schwarz R, Isermann R, Bohm J, Nell J, Rieth P (1999) Clamping force estimation for a brakeby-wire actuator. SAE Technical Paper 990482Google Scholar
  18. Window AL (1992) Strain gauge technology, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations