Contextualizing Charisma: Theoretical and Empirical Indications



As we pointed out in the first chapter, research on the contextual factors of leadership is scant and inconclusive. This is all the more so in regard to the study of charisma. We maintain the correlation between the context and the characteristics of charisma could and should be further investigated, to which this chapter hopes to contribute in terms of some theoretical and empirical insights. However, to start with, some preliminary contextual indications will be pointed out in particular relation to Singapore.


Structural Constraint Power Center Filial Piety Impression Formation Charismatic Leader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bell, R. S. (1986). Charisma and illegitimate authority. In R. M. Glassman (Ed.), Charisma, history and social structure (pp. 57–70). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  2. Bendix, R. (1962). Max Weber: An intellectual portrait. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. L. (1963). Charisma and religious innovation: The social location of the Israelite prophecy. American Sociological Review, 28, 940–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boal, K. B., & Bryson, J. M. (1988). Charismatic leadership: A phenomenological and historical approach. In J. G. Hunt, B. R. Baliga, & H. P. Dachler (Eds.), Emerging leadership vistas (pp. 12–26). Toronto: Lexington.Google Scholar
  5. Bond, M. H. (1991). Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, H. C. (1971). Singapore: The politics of survival. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chan, H. C. (1975). Politics in an administrative state: Where has the politics gone? In S. C. Meow (Ed.), Trends in Singapore (pp. 51–68). Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, H. C. (1993). Democracy: Evolution and Implementation, an Asian Perspective. In R. Bartley et al. (Eds.), Democracy and capitalism: Asian and American perspectives (pp. 1–26). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian studies.Google Scholar
  9. Chua, B. H. (1995). Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Conger, J. A. (1988). Theoretical foundations of charismatic leaders. In J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 12–40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Behavioral dimensions of charismatic leadership. In J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 78–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Coser, L. (1967). Continuities in the study of social conflict. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Daniel, F., & Hugh, A. (1983). Managing individual and group behavior in organizations (pp. 405–406). London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Dow, T. E., Jr. (1969). The theory of charisma. The Sociological Quarterly, 10, 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1968). Max Weber: On charisma and institution building. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Emmerson, K. D. (1995). Singapore and the ‘Asian values’ debate. Journal of Democracy, 6–4, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erez, M. & Early, C. P. (1993). Culture, Self-identity and work (pp. 18–95, 172–194). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Friedland, W. H. (1964). For a sociological concept of charisma. Social Forces, 43, 18–26.Google Scholar
  20. Geertz, C. (1977). Centers, kings and charisma: reflections on the symbolics of power. In J. Ben-David & T. N. Clarck (Eds.), Culture and its creators (pp. 150–171). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gerth, H. H. & Mills C. W. (Eds. and Trans.). (1947). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 245–264). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  22. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1989). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Misumi, J., & Perterson, M. F. (1985). The performance-maintenance (PM) theory of leadership: Review of a Japanese research program. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moscovici, S. (1980). Towards a theory of conversion behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 209–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ow, C. H. (1984). Singapore: Past, present and future. In P. S. You, C. Y. Lim, P. S. You, & C. Y. Lim (Eds.), Singapore: Twenty-five years of development (p. 377). Singapore: Nan Yang Xing Zhou Lianhe Zabao.Google Scholar
  27. Perinbanayagan, R. S., & Wilson, R. A. (1971). The dialectics of charisma. The Sociological Quarterly, 12, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Redding, G. (1990). The spirit of the Chinese capitalism. Berlin: W. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  29. Rosen, D. (1984). Leadership systems in world cultures. In Kellerman, B. (Ed.) Leadership: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 39–61).Google Scholar
  30. Runciman, W. G. (1963). Charismatic legitimacy and one party rule in Ghana. Archives Europeenes de Sociologie., 4, 145–165.Google Scholar
  31. Runciman, W. G. (Ed.) & Matthews, E. (Trans.) (1978). Max Weber: Selections in translation (pp. 226–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organization culture and leadership: A dynamic view (pp. 85–111, 209–243). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Shils, E. A. (1965). Charisma, order and status. American Sociological Review, 30, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sikorski, D. (1991). Resolving the Liberal-Socialist dichotomy: The political economy of prosperity in Singapore. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society., 4(4), 403–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict. (Translated by Kurt, H. Wolff). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1993). Social psychology across cultures: Analysis and perspectives. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Tambiah, S. J. (1984). The Buddhist saints of the forest and the cult of amulets (pp. 321–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner, V. (1967). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. In The forest of symbols (pp. 93–111). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Weber, M. (1924) 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. In Henderson, A. M. & Parsons, T. (trans.), Parsons, T. (Ed.) New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Willner, A. R. (1984). The spellbinders: Charismatic political leadership. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wolfenstein, E. V. (1967). The revolutionary personality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Chan Institute of Social StudiesAp Lei ChauHong Hong

Personalised recommendations