Advertisement

Methodological Operations

Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads

Abstract

The discussion so far, on the subjective, perceptual, and dialectical nature of reality, seems to indicate that a framework for the analysis of charisma requires a qualitative approach and that, more particularly, a case study approach may suit the analysis of charismatic leadership.

Keywords

Ideal Type Case Study Approach Charismatic Leader Unique Idea Subjective Meaning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1992). What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis. In H. S. Becker & C. R. Charles (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 53–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bensman, J., & Givant, M. (1975). Charisma and modernity: The use and abuse of a concept. Social Research, 42(4), 570–614.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. (1967). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Brynman, A, Stephens, M, Campo, C. (1996). The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), Fall. 353–370.Google Scholar
  6. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Calder, B. J. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In M. B. Staw & R. G. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 179–205). Chicago: St Clair.Google Scholar
  8. Eu Meng, K. (1995). Singapore’s extraordinary people (pp. 44–55). Singapore: Television Corporation of Singapore and Landmark Books.Google Scholar
  9. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status and idiosyncracy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Popper, K. R., & Eules, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain (pp. 36–50). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organization culture and leadership: A dynamic view (pp. 85–111, 209–243). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Shils, E. A., Finch, H. A. (Trans. and Ed.) (1949). Max Weber on the methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Tong, C. K., & Yong, P. K. (1998). Guanxi bases, Xinyong and Chinese business network. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(1), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Willner, A. R. (1984). The spellbinders: Charismatic political leadership. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Chan Institute of Social StudiesAp Lei ChauHong Hong

Personalised recommendations