Advertisement

Whither E-Government? Web 2.0 and the Future of E-Government

  • Michael J. Ahn
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 1)

Abstract

After the initial excitement, enthusiasm about e-Government has greatly diminished over time as the term has come to be equated with simple administrative services such as driver’s license renewal and online income tax filing and no real transformation seemed to be taking place from e-Government as anticipated. The future of e-Government also seemed bleak and, to many, e-Government has reached its ultimate destination of mediocrity and the past trend seemed to suggest that e-Government is not going to get any better than what we have now. In such context, this chapter explores the implication of the rise of Web 2.0 in the future of e-Government in America. The emergence of Web 2.0 and increasingly available public data and information has created a synergy in which nongovernmental actors such as citizens and NGOs became increasingly capable of developing e-Government type services that have typically been developed by the government. This shift from a single-developer (monopolistic) model of e-Government to a multiple-provider model can work as a foundation from which the real transformative potentials of e-Government may materialize as the new model introduces a much wider spectrum of resources, innovativeness, and political incentives than the traditional model. The implications of the emerging trend in the future of e-Government as well as the changing role of government in e-Government are discussed.

Keywords

Public Information Really Simple Syndication Nursing Home Quality Online Public Service Open Data Initiative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersen, K. N., Medaglia, R., Vatrapu, R., Henriken, H. Z., & Gauld, R (2011) The forgotten promise of e-government maturity: Assessing responsiveness in the digital public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 439–445.Google Scholar
  2. Applebaum, A. I. (2002). Failure in the cybermarketplace of ideas. In E. C. Kamarck, & J. S. Nye (Eds.), Governance.com : Democracy in the information age (pp. 17–31). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, C. H., & Di Maio, A. (2000). Gartner's four phases of E-government model. from http://www.gartner.com
  4. Business Insider (February 26, 2011). Make your own mobile apps for the android market. Retrieved 1/26, 2012, from http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-02-26/tech/30068937_1_android-apps-app-inventor-mobile-website
  5. Chang, A., & Kannan, P. K. (2008). Leveraging web 2.0 in government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.Google Scholar
  6. Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Policy, 15, 1–9.Google Scholar
  7. Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of E-government: Are they correct? an empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523.Google Scholar
  8. Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of E-governance. Public Administration Review, 68, S86–S102.Google Scholar
  9. Edmiston, K. D (2003) State and local E-government: Prospects and challenges. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 20–45.Google Scholar
  10. Executive Office of the President. (2009). Transparency and open governmentmemorandum for the heads of executive department and agencies. Retrieved 2/1/2011, 2012, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/
  11. FlyOnTime.us. (2011). About FlyOnTime.us. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.flyontime.us/about
  12. Furlong, S. R., & Kerwin, C. M. (2005). Interest group participation in rule making: A decade of change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 353–370.Google Scholar
  13. Gant, D., Gant, J., & Johnson, C. C. (2002). State Web Portals: Delivering and Financing E-service. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. From http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/state-web-portals-delivering-and-financing-e-service
  14. Grönlund, Å. (2002). Electronic government : Design, applications, and management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Hiller, J., & Belanger, F. (2001). Privacy strategies for electronic government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. from http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/privacy-strategies-electronic-government
  16. Ho, A. T. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the E-government initaitive. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.Google Scholar
  17. Holden, S., Norris, D. F., & Fletcher, P. D (2003) Electronic government at the local level. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 325–344.Google Scholar
  18. IDG (2003). IDC Finds that Broadband Adoption Will Drive Internet Traffic Growth, accessed 09/18, 2009, http://www.idc.com
  19. Kenyon, H. (November 26, 2010). Data modeling for the masses. Government Computer News, accessed 02/01/2011, from http://gcn.com/articles/2010/11/26/federal-site-offers-data-modeling-for-the-masses.aspx
  20. Komando, K. (September 8, 2011). Make your own smartphone apps. USA Today, Google Scholar
  21. Kundra, V. (2010). They gave us the beatles, we gave them data.gov. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/01/21/they-gave-us-beatles-we-gave-then-datagov
  22. La Porte, T., Demchak, C. C., & De Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web—empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 34(4), 411–446.Google Scholar
  23. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122–136.Google Scholar
  24. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of E-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4)Google Scholar
  25. Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 12–20.Google Scholar
  26. Norris, D. F. (2010). E-government 2020: Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose. Public Administration Review, 70(Special)Google Scholar
  27. Noveck, B. (2009). Open government laboratories of democracy. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2009/11/19/open-government-laboratories-democracy
  28. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved 1/26, 2012, from http://oreilly.com
  29. Popular Mechanics. (September 1, 2011). How to make your own apps. Retrieved 1/26, 2012, from http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/how-to/software/how-to-make-your-own-apps
  30. Ronaghan, S. A . (2001). Benchmarking E-Government: A Global Perspective. New York : United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration and American Society for Public Administration. From http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN021547.pdf
  31. Scholl, H. J (2003) Electronic government: Make or buy? In Electronic Government: Second International Conference, EGOV 2003 proceedings Prague, Czech Republic. Google Scholar
  32. Scott, J. K. (2006). “E” the people: Do U.S. municipal government web sites support public involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 341–353.Google Scholar
  33. The Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). The community health data initiative. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/innovations/CHDI
  34. Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of E-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 83–102.Google Scholar
  35. Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2005). E-democracy, E-commerce, and E-research. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259–280.Google Scholar
  36. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E-governance developments in european union cities: Reshaping Government’s relationship with citizens. Governance, 19(2), 277–302.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. General Services Administration. (2011a). About challenge.gov. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://challenge.gov/about
  38. U.S. General Services Administration. (2011b). Data.govFAQ. Retrieved 02/01, 2011, from http://www.data.gov/faq
  39. Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540.Google Scholar
  40. Wescott, C. (2001). E-Government in the Asia-Pacific Region. Asian Journal of Political Science 9(2): 1–24.Google Scholar
  41. West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
  42. West, D. M. (2005). Digital government : Technology and public sector performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. West, D. M. (2008). Improving technology utilization in electronic government around the world. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  44. White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2000). Confronting information overload. Journal of School Health, 70(4)Google Scholar
  45. Williams, A. (November 11, 2007). Too much information? ignore it. New York Times Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Policy and Public AffairsUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations