Abstract
In this chapter, we examine and compare the activity in the two politically focused Facebook groups, “Join the Coffee Party Movement” and “Tea Party Patriots,” from the time period immediately preceding the 2010 mid-term elections through the week following the seating of the newly elected Congress (October 25, 2010–January 12, 2011). We incorporate social network analysis of electronic trace data coupled with a framing analysis of the topics posted by the group administrators (parent posts) to provide an understanding of the agenda setting practices of administrators and subsequent discourse from the participants that occur in these two groups. Through this analysis we identify three interesting findings. First, there are shared topics of discourse that are framed differently in the two groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agre, P. E. (2004). The Practical Republic: Social Skills and the Progress of Citizenship. In A. Feenberg (Ed.), Community in the Digital Age (pp. 201–224). Rowman and Littlefield.
Bebbe, S. A., & Masterson, J. T. (2009). Communicating in Small groups: Practices and Principles (9). Boston: Pearson Education.
Cassell, J., Huffaker, D., Tversky, D., & Ferriman, K. (2006). The language of online leadership: Gender and youth engagement on the Internet. Developmental Psychology, 42, 436–449.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis (Introducing Qualitative Methods series). London: Simon & Schuster.
Farrell, H., & Drezner, D. (2008). The Power and Politics of Blogs. Public Choice, 134, 15–30.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Lebanon: University Press of New England.
Goggins, S., Galyen, K., & Laffey, J. (2010). Network Analysis of Trace Data for the Support of Group Work: Activity Patterns in a Completely Online Course. Proceedings from ACM Group, Sanibel Island, FL.
Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Kaltenbrunner, A., & Banchs, R. E. (2010). The structure of political discussion networks: a model for the analysis of online deliberation. Journal of Information Technology, 2010, 1–14.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. (1992). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources (6). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hill, K. A., & Hughes, J. E. (1997). Computer-Mediated Political Communication: The USENET and Political Communities. Political Communication, 14(1), 3–27.
Hughes, J. (2007). The Chechnya Conflict: freedom fighters of terrorists? Demokratizatsiva, 15, 293–311.
Karpowitz, C. F., Monson, J. Q., Patterson, K. D., & Pope, J. C. (2011). Tea Time in America? The Impact of the Tea Party Movement on the 2010 Midterm Elections. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(2), 303–309.
Kavanaugh, A., Perez-Quinones, M. A., Tedesco, J., & Sanders, W. (2010). Toward a Virtual Town Square in the Era of Web 2.0. International Handbook of Internet Research, 2010, 279–294.
Mascaro, C., & Goggins, S. (2011a). Brewing Up Citizen Engagement: The Coffee Party on Facebook. Proceedings from Communities and Technologies, Brisbane, Australia.
Mascaro, C., & Goggins, S. (2011b). The Daily Brew: The Structural Evolution of the Coffee Party on Facebook During the 2010 United States Midterm Election Season. Proceedings from 2011 Political Networks Conference at The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mascaro, C., Novak, A., & Goggins, S. (2012). Shepherding and Censorship: Discourse Management in the Tea Party Patriots Facebook Group. Proceedings from Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (E-Government Track), Grand Wailea Maui, Hawaii.
McCombs, M. (1994). News Influence on our pictures of the world. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 1–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbraum Associates.
McCombs, M. (2005). A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6, 543–557.
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. J. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Towards a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19, 221–246.
Opsahl, T. (2009). Structure and Evolution of Weighted Networks. Ph.D. University of London, London, UK.
Park, A. (2010). Why I started Coffee Party USA. Retrieved October 15, 2010, from http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/18/park.coffee.party
Rainie, L. (2011). The Internet and Campaign 2010. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/The-Internet-and-Campaign-2010.aspx
Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R. K., & Medina, R. (2010). Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election. Information Polity, 15, 11–31.
Spillius, A. (2010). US Midterms: Coffee Party Emerges to take on the Tea Party. Retrieved October 28, 2010 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/us-politics/8088024/US-midterms-Coffee-Party-emerges-to-take-on-the-Tea-Party.html
Sweetser, K. D., & Weaver Lariscy, R. (2008). Candidates Make Good Friends: An Analysis of Candidates’ Uses of Facebook. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(3), 175–198.
Urbina, I. (2009). Beyond Beltway, Health Debate Turns Hostile. New York Times,.
Williams, C., & Gulati, G. J. (2007). Social Networks in Political Campaigns: Facebook and the 2006 Midterm Elections. Proceedings from American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Williams, C., & Gulati, G. J. (2009). Facebook Grows Up: An Empirical Assessment of its Role in the 2008 Congressional Elections. Proceedings from Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Woodly, D. (2008). New Competencies in Democratic Communication: Blogs, agenda setting and political participation. Public Choice, 134, 109–123.
Zak, D. (2010). Coffee Party activists say their civic brew’s a tastier choice than Tea Party’s. Washington Post.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mascaro, C.M., Novak, A.N., Goggins, S.P. (2012). Emergent Networks of Topical Discourse: A Comparative Framing and Social Network Analysis of the Coffee Party and Tea Party Patriots Groups on Facebook. In: Reddick, C., Aikins, S. (eds) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1447-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1448-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)