Abstract
A hallmark of best practice in school libraries is for students and faculty to have maximum access to library resources and services. However, findings from a recent quantitative study indicate that this is not always the case. The researchers surveyed school librarians in North Carolina and Virginia to determine the effects that scheduling, library closures, and poverty had on access to school libraries. There were three major findings from the study. First, the results revealed a direct relationship between flexible scheduling and an increase in per-pupil book circulation in elementary schools. Next, the findings showed that school libraries were closed, while students were in session, an average of 17 full days in an academic year. Finally, the study demonstrated that K-12 school libraries serving large proportions of children living in poverty were open fewer days and had fewer resources than schools that served small proportions of students living in poverty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We used the critical alpha threshold of p  <  0.10 for testing statistical significance.
References
American Association of School Librarians. (1991). Position statement on flexible scheduling. Chicago: American Association of School Librarians. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/aaslproftools/positionstatements/ALA_print_layout_1_202360_202360.cfm.
American Association of School Librarians. (2005). Access to resources and services in the school library media program, an interpretation of the library bill of rights. Chicago: American Library Association. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/librarybill/interpretations/accessresources.cfm.
American Association of School Librarians. (2006). Position statement on the value of library media programs in education. Chicago: American Library Association. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/aaslproftools/positionstatements/aaslpositionstatementvalue.cfm.
American Association of School Librarians. (2007). Standards for the 21st – Century learner. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/guidelinesandstandards/learningstandards/AASL_Learning_Standards_2007.pdf.
American Association of School Librarians. (2007). School libraries count! A national survey of school library media programs. 2007. Chicago, IL. Retrieved April 14, 2010, from http://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/school_libraries_count07_report.pdf.
American Association of School Librarians. (2008). School libraries count! The second national survey of school library media programs. 2008. Chicago, IL. Retrieved on April 14, 2010, from http://www.btsb.com/brochures/SLCreport2008.pdf.
American Association of School Librarians. (2009). Empowering learners: Guidelines for school library media programs. Chicago: American Library Association.
American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1998). Information power: Building partnerships for learning. Chicago: American Library Association.
American Library Association. (2011). Policy statement on library services to the poor. Chicago: American Library Association. Retrieved April 11, 2010, from http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/governance/policymanual/servicespoor.cfm.
Burgin, R., & Bracy, P. B. (2003). An essential connection: How quality school library media programs improve student achievement in North Carolina. Spring, TX: Hi Willow Research and Publishing.
Dickinson, G, Gavigan, K., & Pribesh, S. (2008). Open and accessible: The relationship between closures and circulation in school library media centers. School Library Media Research, 11. American Library Association. Retrieved August 26, 2008, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/aaslpubsandjournals/slmrb/slmrcontents/volume11.
Gavigan, K., Pribesh, S., & Dickinson, G. (2010). Fixed or flexible schedule? Schedule impacts and school library circulation. Library & Information Science Research, 32, 131–137.
Haycock, K. (1998). The impact of scheduling on cooperative program planning and teaching (CPPT) and information skills instruction. School Libraries in Canada, 18(3), 20–23.
Holt, L. E., & Holt, G. E. (2010). Public library services for the poor: Doing all we can. Chicago: American Library Association.
Krashen, S. (2004). Power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Lance, K. C. (1994). The impact of school library media centers on academic achievement. School Library Media Quarterly, 22, 167–170. {in Colorado}.
Lance, K. C. (2002a). The impact of school library media centers on academic achievement. Teacher Librarian, 29(3), 29–34.
Lance, K. C. (2002b). What research tells us about the importance of school libraries. Teacher Librarian: The Journal for School Library Professionals, 30(1), 76–78.
Lance, K. C., Rodney, M., & Hamilton-Pennell, C. (2003a). How school libraries improve outcomes for children: The New Mexico study. San Jose, CA: Hi Willow Press.
Lance, K. C., Rodney, M., & Hamilton-Pennell, C. (2003b). The impact of Michigan school librarians on academic achievement: Kids who have libraries succeed. Lansing, MI: Library of Michigan.
Lance, K. C., Welllburn, L., & Hamilton-Pennell, C. (1993). The impact of school library media centers on academic achievement. Castle Rock, CO: Hi Willow Research & Publishing.
McCracken, A. (2001). School library media specialists’ perceptions of practice and importance of roles described in Information Power. School Library Media Research, 4 2001. Retrieved April 14, 2010, from http://libproxy.uncg.edu:2072/hww/results/results_single_fulltext.jhtml;hwwilsonid=04ZOFLZVZS2YPQA3DILCFGOADUNGIIV0.
McGregor, J. (2006). Flexible scheduling: Implementing an innovation. School Library Media Research, 9, 1–27.
Michie, J., & Chaney, B. (2000). Assessment of the role of school and public libraries in support of educational reform. General Audience Report. Retrieved April 14, 2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/2f/f9.pdf.
Miller, M., & Shontz, M. (2003). The SLJ Spending survey: While funding takes a hit, libraries expand their services. School Library Journal, 49(10), 52–59.
Neuman, S. B., & Celano, D. (2001). Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 8–26.
Pribesh, S., & Gavigan, K. (2009, March/April). Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE)/Linworth 2009 Youth Services Paper Award: Equal opportunity? Poverty and characteristics of school library media centers. Library Media Connection, 27(5), 20–22.
Shannon, D. (1996). Tracking the transition to a flexible access library program in two Library Power elementary schools. School Library Media Quarterly, 24(3), 155–163.
Van Deusen, J. D. (1996). An analysis of the time use of elementary school library media specialists and factors that influence it. School Library Media Quarterly, 24(2), 85–92.
Van Deusen, J. D., & Tallman, J. (1994). The impact of scheduling on curriculum consultation and information skills instruction. Part one: The 1993–1994 AASL/Highsmith Research Award Study. School Library Media Quarterly, 23(1), 7–25.
Venturella, K. (1998). Poor people and library services. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
Zweizig, D. L. (1999). Access and use of library resources in Library Power. School Libraries Worldwide, 5(2), 16–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gavigan, K., Dickinson, G., Pribesh, S. (2012). ACCESS Issues in School Library Media Centers: Examining Library Schedules, Library Closures, and Poverty. In: Orey, M., Jones, S., Branch, R. (eds) Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, vol 36. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1305-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1305-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1304-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1305-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)