Skip to main content

Towards a Convergence of the Ethics of Tax Evasion and Secession

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics of Tax Evasion

Abstract

The scholars who advocate secession on the ground that minorities are entitled to self-determination (i.e., a collective right to separate from a larger State) usually leave out further thought on the ethics of tax evasion (i.e., the individual right to evade taxation). The aim of this chapter is to fill this gap by showing that the ethics of secession and tax evasion might converge. If it is morally permissible for some minorities in a given territory to evade the rule and taxation of the State legislating in a given geographic area, and eventually to secede from the respective State, why should not this right apply to anyone, regardless his religion or ethnic background? Moreover, why should this right depend on such arbitrary criteria as religion or ethnicity, and not be extended to any individual in disagreement with the legislation of its State?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, J. A. 2002. Place and Politics in Modern Italy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagus, Ph, Block, W., Eabrasu, M., Howden, D. & Rostan, J. 2011. ‘The Ethics of Tax Evasion.’ Business and Society Review, 116:3, 375–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, E. & Wallerstein, I. 1991. Race, Nation, Class. Ambiguous Identities. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiat, F. 1950. The Law. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Foundation for Economic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, B. L. 1998. ‘How to Secede in Business Without Really Leaving: Evidence of the Substitution of Arbitration for Litigation.’ In D. Gordon (Ed.) Secession, State & Liberty: ­243–87. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, H. 1977. ‘In defence of the consent theory of political obligation and authority.’ Ethics, 87:3, 260–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, H. 1998. ‘Democratic Theory of Political Self-Determination.’ In P. B. Lehning (Ed.) Theories of secession: 32–59. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishai, L. 1998. ‘Secession and the Problems of Liberal Theory.’ In P. B. Lehning (Ed.) Theories of secession: 92–110. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookman, M. Z. 1993. The Economics of Secession. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, I. 1991. ‘Fraternal Illusions; Nations and Politics in the USSR.’ American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies. Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilmayer, L. 1991. ‘Secession and self-determination. A territorial interpretation.’ Yale Journal of International Law, 16, 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. 1998. ‘Myths and misconceptions in the study of nationalism.’ In M. Moore (Ed.) National self-determination and secession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. 1991. Secession. The morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. San Francisco: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. 1997. ‘Self-determination, secession and the rule of law.’ In R. M. a. J. McMahan (Ed.) The morality of nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burg, D. F. 2004. A World History of Tax Rebellions. An Encyclopedia of Tax Rebels, Revolts, and Riots from Antiquity to the Present. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. E. 2003. Separation, Assimilation, Accomodation. Contrasting Ethnic Minory Policies. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. 1998. ‘The priority of function to structure. A new approach to secession.’ In P. B. Lehning (Ed.) Theories of secession. Londres: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. 1996. The Sicilian Mafia. The Business of Private Protection. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. 1998. ‘Good and bad causes for national secession.’ In P. B. Lehning (Ed.) Theories of secession. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, O. A. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyality. Cambirdge, Mass: Harvard Univesity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. 2004. The Elements of Law Natural and Politic. Kessinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höffe, O. 2007. Democracy in an Age of Globalisation. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsmann, G. 2003. ‘Secession and the Production of Defense.’ In H.-H. Hoppe (Ed.) The Myth of National Defense. Hans-Hermann Hoppe: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jomo, K. S. 2004. ‘The New Economic Policy and Interethnic Relations in Malaysia.’ New York: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. 1998. ‘Is Federalism a Viable Alternative to Secession ?’ In P. B. Lehning (Ed.) Theories of Secession: 111–50. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. 2002. ‘Western Political Theory and Ethnic Relations in Eastern Europe.’ In K. W. a. O. M. (Ed.) Managing Diversity in Plural Societies: Minorities, Migration and Nation-Building in Post-Communist Europe: 13–105. Ottawa: Forum Eastern Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. 1980. Second Treatise of Government. Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. 1992. ‘A Third Liberal Theory of secession.’ The Liverpool Law Review, 14:1, 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. 1994. ‘Secession Reconsidered.’ Journal of Libertarian Studies, 11:1, 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R. 2004. The philosophy of taxation and public finance. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1998. ‘Secession and the principle of nationality.’ In M. Moore (Ed.) National self-determination and secession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. 2001. The ethics of nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. 2001. ‘Introduction.’ Minority Languages, Ethnicity and the State in the European Union: 1–20. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J. J. 2005. Minority Rights: Between Diversity And Community. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transchel, K. 2006. The Break Up of Yugoslavia (Arbitrary Borders). London: Chelsea House Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. 1961. Africa: The Politics of Independence. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marian Eabrasu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eabrasu, M. (2012). Towards a Convergence of the Ethics of Tax Evasion and Secession. In: McGee, R. (eds) The Ethics of Tax Evasion. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1287-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics