Abstract
Feral swine (Sus scrofa) are an invasive species known to feed on small animals, eggs, roots, and herbaceous material. In addition to being a nuisance on managed lands such as Fort Benning, GA, uncontrolled populations of feral swine destroy habitat and elevate the risk of disease for threatened and endangered species that cohabitate the land. This chapter explores the relative effectiveness of controlling feral swine populations with hunting, contraception, and a combination of the two. To study the issue, the authors used NetLogo (http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/) to develop an agent-based simulation model that incorporates digital maps of the subject population’s habitat at Fort Benning. Simulation results supported the hypothesis that the combination of lethal control and oral contraceptive delivery will provide better control of the Fort Benning feral swine population than will either technique alone. Additionally, the model provides a framework for understanding how feral swine interact with the landscape and helps land managers to predict the impacts of proposed control techniques.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
An operational copy of this model is available through http://extras.springer.com.
References
Adkins RN, Harveson LA (2006) Summer diets of feral hogs in the Davis Mountains, Texas. Southwest Nat 51(4):578–580
Caley P (1997) Movements, activity patterns and habitat use of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a tropical habitat. Wildl Res 24:77–87
Campbell TA, Lapidge SJ, Long DB (2006) Using baits to deliver pharmaceuticals to feral swine in southern Texas. Wildl Soc Bull 34(4):1184–1189
Choquenot D, McIlroy J, Korn T (1996) Managing vertebrate pests: feral pigs. Bureau of resource sciences. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra
Dzieciolowski RM, Clarke CMH, Frampton M (1992) Reproductive characteristics of wild pigs in New Zealand. Acta Theriologica 37:259–270
Fleming PJS, Choquenot D, Mason RJ (2000) Aerial baiting of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) for the control of exotic disease in the semi-arid rangelands of New South Wales. Wildl Res 27(5):531–537
Flowers WL (2001) Effect of age at which semen collection regimens are initiated on production of spermatozoa in boars. North Carolina State University, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Department of Animal Science Annual Swine Report 2001
Graves HB (1984) Behavior and ecology of wild and feral swine (Sus scrofa). J Anim Sci 58(2):482–492
Hanson LB (2006) Demography of feral pig populations at Fort Benning, Georgia. Auburn University, Auburn
Hanson RP, Karstad L (1959) Feral swine in the southeastern United States. J Wildl Manage 23(1):64–74
Herrero J, Garcia-Serrano A, Couto S, Ortuno VM, Garcia-Gonzalez R (2006) Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. Eur J Wildl Res 52(4):245–250
Hirotani A, Nakatani J (1987) Grouping-patterns and inter-group relationships of Japanese wild boars (Sus scrofa leucomystax) in the Rokko mountain area. Ecol Res 2:77–84
Honeyman MS, Roush WB (2002) The effects of outdoor farrowing hut type on prewean piglet mortality in Iowa. Am J Altern Agric 17(2):92–95
Jolley DB (2007) Reproduction and herpetofauna depredation of feral pigs at Fort Benning, Georgia. Auburn University, Auburn
Kavanaugh DM, Linhart SB (2000) A modified bait for oral delivery of biological agents to raccoons and feral swine. J Wildl Dis 36(1):86–91
Kurz JC, Marchint RI (1972) Radiotelemetry studies of feral hogs in South Carolina. J Wildl Manage 36(4):1240–1248
Matschke GH (1964) The influence of oak mast on European wild hog reproduction. In: Proceedings Annual Conference Southeast Association of Game and Fish Commission, vol 18. pp 35–39
Mauget R (1991) Reproductive biology of the wild Suidae. In: Barrett RH, Spitz F (eds) Biology of Suidae. IRGM, Toulouse, pp 49–64
Mitchell J (1998) The effectiveness of aerial baiting for control of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in north Queensland. Wildl Res 25(3):297–303
Pedersen LJ (2007) Sexual behaviour in female pigs. Horm Behav 52(1):64–69
Saunders G, McLeod S (1999) Predicting home range size from the body mass or population densities of feral pigs, Sus scrofa (Artiodactyla: Suidae). Aust J Ecol 24:538–543
Taylor RB (1991) The feral hog in Texas. In: Federal Aid Report Series Number 28. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin
Twigg LE, Lowe T, Martin G (2007) Bait consumption by, and 1080-based control of, feral pigs in the Mediterranean climatic region of south-western Australia. Wildl Res 34(2):125–139
Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Computer software. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burton, J.L. et al. (2012). A Model for Evaluating Hunting and Contraception as Feral Hog Population Control Methods. In: Westervelt, J., Cohen, G. (eds) Ecologist-Developed Spatially-Explicit Dynamic Landscape Models. Modeling Dynamic Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1257-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1257-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1256-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1257-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)