Skip to main content

An Individual-Based Model for Metapopulations on Patchy Landscapes-Genetics and Demography (IMPL-GD)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Ecologist-Developed Spatially-Explicit Dynamic Landscape Models

Part of the book series: Modeling Dynamic Systems ((MDS))

Abstract

The model described in this chapter addresses the risk of metapopulation extinction when a habitat parcel is eliminated from a patchy landscape. The authors describe the Individual-Based Model for Metapopulations on Patchy Landscapes-Genetics and Demography (IMPL-GD), an agent-based simulation model developed using NetLogo (http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/). This model is intended to provide a better understanding of how ecological variables such as landscape physical characteristics, population genetic and demographic traits, and network relationships between habitat parcels relate dynamically to metapopulation viability. The IMPL-GD places generic organisms on a landscape that consists of habitable and non-habitable patches, including traversable but non-habitable terrain. The agents, called “whatsits,” were designed to reflect the characteristics of small, solitary animals that defend small, circular territories in the landscape. They are defined in the model by a unique identification number, age, sex, lineage, and other characteristics. The IMPL-GD model enables the user to rapidly execute thousands of simulations in which a random parcel of habitable terrain is eliminated from the landscape after a given number of time steps and the impact on whatsit population viability is recorded. The output from a large number of IMPL-GD simulations can statistically analyzed to identify associations between the independent ecological variables and quantify their relation to the dependent variable of whatsit survival in the form of a conservation utility index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An operational copy of this model is available through http://extras.springer.com.

References

  • Brown JH (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 124(2):255–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkeamäki E, Suhonen J (2002) Distribution and habitat specialization of species affect local extinction in dragonfly Odonata populations. Ecography 25(4):459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munday PL (2004) Habitat loss, resource specialization, and extinction on coral reefs. Glob Chang Biol 10(10):1642–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens IPF, Bennett PM (2000) Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(22):12144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, Fairbanks DHK, Wessels KJ, Van Jaarsveld AS (2002) A multicriteria approach to reserve selection: addressing long-term biodiversity maintenance. Biodivers Conserv 11(5):769–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothley KD (2006) Finding the tradeoffs between the reserve design and representation. Environ Manage 38(3):327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma YF, Urban DL (2005) Beta diversity and nature reserve system design in the Yukon, Canada. Conserv Biol 19(4):1262–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. Computer software. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Accessed 01/2011

  • With KA, Crist TO (1995) Critical thresholds in species’ responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76(8):2446–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1922) Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat 56:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer L. Burton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

User-specified setting

Description

Range or options

patch-seed

Seeds the random number generator for initial placement of seed patches, to ensure that runs are replicable

Any number

Landscape_Specs?

If true, user-defined parameters constrain acceptance of randomly generated landscapes

True or false

#Habitats?

If true, acceptance of randomly generated landscapes is based on the number of discrete habitat parcels

True or false

seed-patches

The number of patches that will be designated “habitable” or “not habitable” to begin landscape initialization

0–350 Patches

seed-good

The percentage of seed patches that will be designated “habitable”

Any whole number percentage

#-Habitats

The number of discrete habitat parcels that will comprise an acceptable landscape

Any whole number

Parcel_Size?

If true, acceptance of randomly generated landscapes is constrained by the area of habitat parcels

True or false

min-terr/hab

The minimum number of whatsit territories available in each acceptable habitat parcel

Any whole number

max-terr/hab

The maximum number of whatsit territories available in each acceptable habitat parcel

Any whole number

%_Good/Bad?

If true, acceptance of randomly generated landscapes is constrained by the proportions of habitable and non-habitable patches

True or false

min%good

The minimum percent habitable patches in an acceptable landscape created via the “seed-all” algorithm

Any whole number percentage

max%good

The maximum percent habitable patches in an acceptable landscape created via the “seed-all” algorithm

Any whole number percentage not  >  (min%good)

min%bad

The minimum percent non-habitable patches in an acceptable landscape created via the “seed-all” algorithm

Any whole number percentage

max%bad

The maximum percent non-habitable patches in an acceptable landscape created via the “seed-all” algorithm

Any whole number percentage not  >  (min%bad)

whatsit-seed

Seeds the random number generator for initial placement of whatsits, to ensure that runs are replicable

Any number

initial-whatsits

The number of founder whatsits created to begin the run

Any whole number

#_Steps

The total number of steps included in the replicate

To extinction

1

10

25

50

100

150

step#

The step on which habitat elimination will occur

Any whole number

#

The number of habitat parcels that are eliminated at the scheduled step

Any whole number

criteria

Determines the order in which habitat parcels are selected for elimination

Highest or lowest

attribute

The characteristic by which habitat parcels are chosen for elimination

Random

#-of-whatsits

Births-previous-year

Deaths-previous-year

Net-population-change-previous-year

#-outmigrants-previous-year

Area

Edge-to-area-ratio

Distance-to-closest-habitat

Female:male_ratio

#-founders-represented

#-founders-represented-­only-here

#-alleles

#-private-alleles

Heterozygosity

Abs-diversity

Relative-diversity

Differentiation-relative

Contribution-to-total-diversity

Allelic-richness

Contribution-to-total-allelic-richness

Node-degree

Connectivity-contribution

Bonacich’s-centrality

Node-strength

Sum-of-linked-nodes’-strengths

Contribution-to-connectivity-strength

#-of-founders-represented

survival_to_age_1

The mortality rate for individuals in the first year of life

0–1 (increment 0.001)

annual-survival_>age_1

The mortality rate for individuals at least 1 year of age

0–1 (increment 0.001)

death-rate-grn

The odds that a dispersing whatsit will die while traveling one cell-length through habitable terrain

0 to (death-rate-red) (increment 0.0001)

death-rate-red

The odds that a dispersing whatsit will die while traveling one cell-length through non-habitable terrain

(death-rate-grn) to 1 (increment 0.0001)

territory-radius

The distance (in patches) from a whatsit’s location to the boundary of its territory in all directions

1–20 Cells (whole numbers)

allow-M/F-terr-overlap

This setting determines whether or not a patch may be included simultaneously in both a male and a female territory

True or false

first-repro-age

The minimum age at which whatsits are capable of reproducing

0–5 Steps

superior-repro-age

The age at which individuals become more likely to reproduce than younger whatsits

0–25 Steps

last-repro-age

The maximum age at which whatsits are capable of reproducing

(superior-repro-age) to 100 steps

lineage-depth

The number of generations contained in each whatsit’s lineage

0–20 Levels

mating-radius

The maximum distance (in patches) at which whatsits are able to mate

1–10 Cells (whole numbers)

Avg_lethal_­equivalents

The average number of lethal equivalents for the population

0–20 (Increment 0.1)

avg-litter-size

The minimum average litter size

0–20

#_Loci

The number of loci for which genetic information is recorded

0–449

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burton, J.L., Lance, R.F., Westervelt, J.D., Leberg, P.L. (2012). An Individual-Based Model for Metapopulations on Patchy Landscapes-Genetics and Demography (IMPL-GD). In: Westervelt, J., Cohen, G. (eds) Ecologist-Developed Spatially-Explicit Dynamic Landscape Models. Modeling Dynamic Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1257-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics