Skip to main content

Basics of Complex Morse Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Invitation to Morse Theory

Part of the book series: Universitext ((UTX))

  • 4262 Accesses

Abstract

In this final chapter, we would like to introduce the reader to the complex version of Morse theory that has proved to be very useful in the study of the topology of complex projective varieties, and more recently in the study of the topology of symplectic manifolds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To be accurate, what we call a linear system is what algebraic geometers refer to as an ample linear system.

  2. 2.

    E.g., (X,A) is a compact ENR pair if X is a compact CW-complex and A is a subcomplex.

  3. 3.

    The are called vanishing because they “melt” when pushed inside \(\hat{X}\).

  4. 4.

    The orientation of the disk is determined by a linear ordering of the variables \({u}_{1},\ldots,{u}_{n}\).

  5. 5.

    Note that while in the definition of the bundle orientation we tacitly used a linear ordering of the variables u i , the bundle orientation itself is independent of such a choice.

  6. 6.

    This sign is different from the one in [AGV2] due to our use of the fiber-first convention. This affects the appearance of the Picard-Lefschetz formulæ. The fiber-first convention is employed in [Lam] as well.

  7. 7.

    The choices of Δ and ∇ depended on linear orderings of the variables u i . However, the intersection number ∇ ∘ Δ is independent of such choices.

  8. 8.

    Given an oriented submanifold S ⊂ X  ∗  its Poincaré dual should satisfy either \({\int }_{S}\omega ={ \int }_{{X}_{{_\ast}}}\omega \wedge {\delta }_{S}\) or \({\int }_{S}\omega ={ \int }_{{X}_{{_\ast}}}{\delta }_{S} \wedge \omega \), \(\forall \omega \in {\Omega }^{\dim S}({X}_{{_\ast}})\), dω = 0. Our sign convention corresponds to first choice. As explained in [Ni1, Prop. 7.3.9] this guarantees that for any two oriented submanifolds S 1, S 2 intersecting transversally we have \({S}_{1} {_\ast} {S}_{2} ={ \int }_{{X}_{{_\ast}}}{\delta }_{{S}_{1}} \wedge {\delta }_{{S}_{2}}\).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liviu Nicolaescu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicolaescu, L. (2012). Basics of Complex Morse Theory. In: An Invitation to Morse Theory. Universitext. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1105-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics