Abstract
Young people from communities with distinct religious or cultural identities have often found it difficult to engage with or be welcomed into citizenship in European democracies where there is no strong sense of inclusive national identity or of citizenship. There is a need to develop a more inclusive conception of national and European citizenship. This chapter presents initial findings from a project in secondary schools in the northeast of England, UK, using a virtual environment to understand how such technology can explore and develop young people’s conceptualisation of a citizenship in harmony with cultural and religious convictions in contemporary British society. European studies of citizenship identity development in traditional educational settings have found them becoming less successful. Initial findings from the present study suggest that a revealing alternative approach is afforded through the use of immersive virtual worlds by applying experiential learning and ethnographic simulation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, R. (2008). Pedagogy, curriculum and culture. In K. Hall, P. Murphy & J. Soler (eds.), Pedagogy and Practice (pp. 3–27). London: Sage.
Amadeo, J., Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Husfeldt, V., & Nikolova, R. (2002). Civic knowledge and engagement: An IEA study of upper secondary students in sixteen countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Bers, M.U. (2001). Identity construction environments: developing personal and moral values through the design of a virtual city. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(9), 4, 365–415.
Bers, U. & Urrea, C. (2000). Technological prayers: Parents and children working with robotics and values. In A. Druin & J. Hendler (eds.), Robots for kids: Exploring new technologies for learning experiences (pp. 194–217). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Bisaillon, D. (1989). Logo computer culture and children’s development: The influence of socio-moral atmosphere. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Bradford Metropolitan District Council (2001). Community Pride not prejudice. Bradford: Bradford Council.
Braidotti, R. (1994). Embodiment, Sexual Difference, and the Nomadic Subject. Hypatia, 8(1), 1–13.
Bruckman, A. (1998). Community support for constructionist learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(1–2), 47–86.
Chief Inspector of Schools (2008). Annual Report, 2008, 29. London: Ofsted.
Commission on integration and cohesion (2007). Our shared future. London: The Stationery Office.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Rochberg-Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things. Cambridge: University Press.
Daily Mail (2007). January 29th.
Deakin C.R., Coates, M., Taylor, M. & Ritchie, S. (2004). A systematic review of the impact of citizenship education on the provision of schooling. Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. Retrieved 1 March 2011 from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=127&language=en-US.
Deakin C.R., Taylor, M., Tew, M., Samuel, E., Durant, K., & Ritchie, S. (2005). A systematic review of the impact of citizenship education on student learning and achievement. Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. Retrieved 01 March 2011 from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=129.
Erikson, E.H. (1950). Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Gallup (2009). The Gallup Coexist Index 2009: A Global Study of Interfaith Relations. London: Gallup.
Gilligan (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldsmith, L. (2008). Citizenship: Our Common Bond. London: The Stationery Office.
Gonzalez, J. (1995). Autotopographies. In J. Brahm & M. Driscoll (eds.), Prosthetic territories: Politics and Hypertechnologies (pp. 133–150). San Francisco: Westview Press Inc.
Hattie, J.A.C. (2009). Visible Learning. London: Routledge.
Home Office (2001a). Building cohesive communities: a report of the Ministerial Group on Public Order and Community Cohesion. London: The Stationery Office.
Home Office (2001b). Community Cohesion: A Report of the Independent Review Team. London: The Stationery Office.
Home Office (2004). Strength in diversity. London: The Stationery Office.
Home Office (2006). Strong and prosperous communities (white paper). London: The Stationery Office.
Independent (2006). Citizenship: Is this the worst taught subject?. Retrieved 1 March 2011 from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/citizenship-is-this-the-worst-taught-subject-406760.html.
Kerr. D., Sturman, L., Schultz, W., & Burge, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 European Report: Civic Knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary school students in 24 European countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved 1 March 2011 from http://www.iea.nl/iea_publications.html.
Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (ed.), Moral development and behavior (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
Kohlberg, L. (1985). The just community approach to moral education in theory and practice. In M. Berkowitz & F. Oser (eds.), Moral education: Theory and application (pp.27–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kollock, P. & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In S. Herring (ed.), Computer-mediated communication (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
MacFarlane, B. (2005). The Disengaged Academic: the Retreat from Citizenship, Higher Education Quarterly, 59(4), 296–312.
Martin, S. (2010). Teachers using learning styles: caught between research and accountability? Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8) 1583–1591.
Martin, S. & Feng, A. (2006). The construction of citizenship and nation building: the Singapore Case, Education for Intercultural Citizenship: Concepts and Comparisons (pp. 47–66). Multilingual Matters.
Martin, S., & Vallance, M. (2008). The impact of synchronous inter-networked teacher training in information and communication technology integration. Computers & Education, 51(1), 34–53.
McGhee, D. (2005). Patriots of the future? A critical examination of community cohesion strategies in contemporary Britain. Sociological Research Online, 10(3).
MORI (2007). What works in community cohesion. London: The Stationery Office.
Ofsted (2006). Towards consensus? Citizenship in secondary school. The Stationery Office.
Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2003). Learning for Cosmopolitan Citizenship: Theoretical debates and young people’s experiences, Educational Review, 55(4), 243–254.
Papert, S. (1987). The value of logic and the logic of values. In B. Inhelder, D. de Caprona & A. Cornu-Wells (eds.), Piaget today (pp. 101–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Schultz, W., Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Losito, B. & Kerr, D. (2008). International Civic and Citizenship Education Study: Assessment Framework. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved 1 March 2011 from http://www.iea.nl.
Schultz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D. & Losito, B. (2010a). Initial Findings from the IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Schultz. W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D. & Losito, B. (2010b). ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic Knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved 1 March 2011 from http://www.iea.nl/iea_publications.html.
Stationery Office (2011a). Retrieved 1 March 2011 from http://www.lifeintheuktest.gov.uk/htmlsite/index.html.
Stationery Office (2011b). Retrieved 1 March 2011 from http://www.tsoshop.co.uk/bookstore.asp?FO=1240167&trackid=002353.
The Equalities Review (2007). Fairness and Freedom: The Final Report of the Equalities Review. London: The Stationery Office.
Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schultz, W. (2001). Citizenship and Education in Twenty-eight Countries: Civic Knowledge and Engagement at Age Fourteen. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Torney-Purta, J., Schwille, J., & Amadeo, J.A. (eds.) (1999). Civic Education Across Countries: Twenty-Four National Case Studies for the IEA Civic Education Project. Delft: IEA.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1992). Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11(1), 3–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martin, S. (2012). Synthetic Worlds and Virtual Citizens: Experimental Ethnographic Simulation, Virtual Autotopography and Emerging Citizenship Identity in Young People. In: Jimoyiannis, A. (eds) Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1083-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1083-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1082-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1083-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)