Abstract
This work proposes an instructional design within a Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) setting. The aim of this design is to examine if the provision of illusionary adaptive support, in the form of control that resides at the collaborators, could be perceived as such and cause intrinsic motivation toward better collaborative performance. Two conditions, i.e., control and experimental, of collaborative concept mapping were applied to 11 groups of dyads. The groups during the experimental condition, unlike the control one, received an illusionary type of support and, according to the experimental results, they produced better collaborative performance, on the basis of relevant indicators, as compared to their performance during the control condition. The proposed approach extends previous relative work from individual to collaborative settings and reveals new possibilities in the design of adaptive CSCL support, under the perspective of illusion of control.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berger, J., & Schnerring, D. (1982). The effects of desire for control and extrinsic rewards on the illusion of control and gambling. Motivation & Emotion, 6(4), 329–335.
Boulding, K. E. (1956). General Systems Theory- The skeleton of science. Management Science, 11(3), 197–208.
Cañas, A. J., Hill, G., Carff, R., Suri, N., Lott, J., & Eskridge, T. (2004). CmapTools: A knowledge modeling and sharing environment. In A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak & F. M. González (eds.), Proceedings of the first international conference on concept mapping ‘Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology’ (pp. 125–133). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Pública de Navarra.
Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & Merriënboer, J. (2009). Combining shared control with variability over surface features: Effects on transfer test performance and task involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 290–298.
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.
Dror, I. E. (2008). Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16, 215–223.
Gabriele, S. (1997). Boulding’s typology elaborated: A framework for understanding school and classroom systems. Systems Practice, 10(3), 271–303.
Gabriele, S. (2010). The hard facts of soft social systems: Towards a theoretical and practical model for schools and other organizations. Retrieved 17 March 2011 from http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings54th/search/authors?searchInitial=G.
Hadjileontiadou, S., Nikolaidou, G., & Hadjileontiadis, L. (2010). Illusionary adaptive support as a means for intrinsic motivation in CSCL settings: A case in concept mapping. In A. Jimoyiannis (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Panhellenic Conference with International Participation ‘Information and Communication Technologies in Education’ (pp. 163–170). Korinthos, Greece: University of Peloponnese.
Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2009). The assistance dilemma in CSCL. In A. Dimitrakopoulou, C. O’ Maley, D. Suthers, & R. Reimann (eds.), Proceedings of the CSCL2009-symposia (pp.37–39). NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Kinzie, M. B. (1990). Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: Learner control, self regulation, and continuing motivation. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 38, 5–21.
Mathworks (2009). Matlab R2009b Signal Processing Toolbox. http://www.mathworks.com.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Merrilnboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 5–34.
Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 375–392.
Reigeluth, C. (1997). Instructional theory, practitioner needs, and new directions: Some reflections. Educational Technology, 37(1), 42–47.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Autonomy is no illusion: Self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness and will. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology (pp. 449–479). New York: Guilford Press.
Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89–100.
Schnackenberg, H. L., & Sullivan, H. J. (2000). Learner control over full and lean computer-based instruction under differing ability levels. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(2), 19–35.
Shroff, R., & Vogel, D. (2009). Assessing the factors deemed to support individual student intrinsic motivation in technology supported online and face-to-face discussions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8, 59–85.
Stahl, G. (2007). Scripting group cognition. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 327–336). New York, NY: Springer.
Vandewaetere, M. (2009). The benefits and drawbacks of learner control as a means for creating adaptive learning environments. Retrieved 8 April 2011 from http://umap09.fbk.eu/sites/umap09.fbk.eu/files/paper_164.pdf.
Vandewaetere, M., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2009). The illusion of adaptivity as instructional method in electronic learning environments. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. Boulay, & A. Graesser (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling (pp. 769–771). The Netherlands: IOS Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hadjileontiadou, S., Nikolaidou, G., Hadjileontiadis, L. (2012). Instructional Design on Controlling the Quality of Collaboration in a CSCL Setting Through Illusionary Adaptive Support. In: Jimoyiannis, A. (eds) Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1083-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1083-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1082-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1083-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)