Education

Chapter

Abstract

Understanding the hierarchy of paradigms, including how they influence theories and models, is the foundation for achievement in local and global education. However, paradigms in education cannot be discussed without first differentiating between a model, a theory, and a paradigm. All too often, educators confuse these three entities which belong to the hierarchy of education. More importantly, understanding the paradigm’s hierarchical structure and its relationship to educational theory is essential to model building and broader educational change. For the most part, educators believe erroneously that these teaching components are interchangeable. Yet, theories and models differ from paradigms and are established to support a greater philosophical and archetypal framework, which is referred to as the paradigm. Unfortunately, the research suggests that these terms continue to be misused and inappropriated not only in psychology, but also in education, which concurs with L’Abate’s (2009) observations that the terms have indeed been misused in various domains.

Keywords

Europe Posit Pyramid Clarification Metaphor 

References

  1. Aranson, E., Blaney, N., Stephen, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom (1st ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bentley, J. K. C. (2010). Thoroughly postmodern Ralph: A commentary on scholar-practitionership. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 4(1), 42–51.Google Scholar
  3. Brophy, J. (2008). Developing students’ appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buraphadeja, V., & Dawson, K. (2008). Content analysis in computer-mediated communication: Analyzing models for assessing critical thinking through the lens of social constructivism. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22, 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, C., Dyson, A., & Millward, A. (1998). Theorising in special education (1st ed.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. De Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). Pedagogic strategies supporting the use of synchronous audiographic conferencing: A review of literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 980–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Lexington, Kentucky: Unabridged classic reprints, p. 145.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, P. M. (2010). Theories-in-use and reflection-in-action: Core principles for LIS education. School of Information and Library Science, 51(1), 18–22.Google Scholar
  9. Experiment Resources & Shuttleworth, M. (2008). What is a paradigm? Retrieved August 8, 2010, from http://www.experiment-resources.com/what-is-a-paradigm.html
  10. Fear, W. J. (2007). Programme evaluation theory: The next step toward a synthesis of logic models and organisational theory. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 4(7), 13–24.Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, R. (2005). Competing models for public education. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0226-25.htm
  12. Gaztambide-Fernandez, R. (2010). Wherefore the musicians? Philos Music Education Review, 18, 67–84.Google Scholar
  13. Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2008). Beyond the theoretical impasse: Extending the applications of Transactional Distance Theory. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
  14. Grossman, P. (2008). Teaching development—experience and philosophy (Using the three Rs). Teacher Education Quarterly, (Spring), 155–169.Google Scholar
  15. Kasl, E., & Yorks, L. (2010). Whose inquiry is this anyway? Money, power, reports, and collaborative inquiry. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(4), 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2011). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (1st ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. L’Abate, L. (2009). Paradigms, theories, and models: Two hierarchical frameworks. In L. L’Abate, P. De Giacomo, M. Capitelli, & S. Longo (Eds.), Science, mind and creativity: The Bari symposium (pp. 107–122). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  19. Learning-Focused Schools (2010, November). Learning-focus solutions that work. Retrieved November 6, 2010, from http://www.learningfocused.com
  20. Long, M. (2007). The psychology of education (6th ed.). Glasgow, UK: Bell & Bain.Google Scholar
  21. Macrine, S. L., & Sabbatino, E. D. (2008). Dynamic assessment and remediation approach: Using the DARA approach to assist struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24, 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merrill, M. D. (unknown). First principles of instruction. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://id2.usu.edu/Papers/5FirstPrinciples.pdf
  23. Morrone, A. S., & Tarr, T. A. (2005). Theoretical eclecticism in the college classroom. Innovative Higher Education, 30(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Noddings, N. (2007). Philosophy of education (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ornstein, L. (2008). Foundations of education (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  26. Pavlov, I. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Milford.Google Scholar
  27. Pulliam, J. D., & Van Patten, J. J. (2007). History of education in America (9th ed.). Upper Saddle Valley, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  28. Rolling, J. H. (2010). Paradigm analysis of arts-based research and implications for education. Studies in Art Education, 51(2), 102–112.Google Scholar
  29. Shattuck, R. (2005). Shame of the schools. New York Review of Books, 52(6), http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2005/apr/07/the-shame-of-the-schools/.
  30. Thompson, M. (2008). Learning-focused solutions that work! Retrieved July 11, 2010, from http://www.learningfocused.com/index.php.
  31. Yin Cheong, C., & Mok, M. M. C. (2008). What effective classroom? Towards a paradigm shift. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(4), 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1955).Google Scholar
  33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1985). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Avant Garde BooksAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations