Skip to main content

Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Understanding the hierarchy of paradigms, including how they influence theories and models, is the foundation for achievement in local and global education. However, paradigms in education cannot be discussed without first differentiating between a model, a theory, and a paradigm. All too often, educators confuse these three entities which belong to the hierarchy of education. More importantly, understanding the paradigm’s hierarchical structure and its relationship to educational theory is essential to model building and broader educational change. For the most part, educators believe erroneously that these teaching components are interchangeable. Yet, theories and models differ from paradigms and are established to support a greater philosophical and archetypal framework, which is referred to as the paradigm. Unfortunately, the research suggests that these terms continue to be misused and inappropriated not only in psychology, but also in education, which concurs with L’Abate’s (2009) observations that the terms have indeed been misused in various domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aranson, E., Blaney, N., Stephen, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom (1st ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J. K. C. (2010). Thoroughly postmodern Ralph: A commentary on scholar-practitionership. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 4(1), 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (2008). Developing students’ appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational Psychologist, 43(3), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buraphadeja, V., & Dawson, K. (2008). Content analysis in computer-mediated communication: Analyzing models for assessing critical thinking through the lens of social constructivism. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22, 130–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C., Dyson, A., & Millward, A. (1998). Theorising in special education (1st ed.). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). Pedagogic strategies supporting the use of synchronous audiographic conferencing: A review of literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 980–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Lexington, Kentucky: Unabridged classic reprints, p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. M. (2010). Theories-in-use and reflection-in-action: Core principles for LIS education. School of Information and Library Science, 51(1), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Experiment Resources & Shuttleworth, M. (2008). What is a paradigm? Retrieved August 8, 2010, from http://www.experiment-resources.com/what-is-a-paradigm.html

  • Fear, W. J. (2007). Programme evaluation theory: The next step toward a synthesis of logic models and organisational theory. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 4(7), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (2005). Competing models for public education. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0226-25.htm

  • Gaztambide-Fernandez, R. (2010). Wherefore the musicians? Philos Music Education Review, 18, 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2008). Beyond the theoretical impasse: Extending the applications of Transactional Distance Theory. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (2008). Teaching development—experience and philosophy (Using the three Rs). Teacher Education Quarterly, (Spring), 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasl, E., & Yorks, L. (2010). Whose inquiry is this anyway? Money, power, reports, and collaborative inquiry. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(4), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2011). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (1st ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Abate, L. (2009). Paradigms, theories, and models: Two hierarchical frameworks. In L. L’Abate, P. De Giacomo, M. Capitelli, & S. Longo (Eds.), Science, mind and creativity: The Bari symposium (pp. 107–122). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learning-Focused Schools (2010, November). Learning-focus solutions that work. Retrieved November 6, 2010, from http://www.learningfocused.com

  • Long, M. (2007). The psychology of education (6th ed.). Glasgow, UK: Bell & Bain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrine, S. L., & Sabbatino, E. D. (2008). Dynamic assessment and remediation approach: Using the DARA approach to assist struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24, 52–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (unknown). First principles of instruction. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from http://id2.usu.edu/Papers/5FirstPrinciples.pdf

  • Morrone, A. S., & Tarr, T. A. (2005). Theoretical eclecticism in the college classroom. Innovative Higher Education, 30(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2007). Philosophy of education (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, L. (2008). Foundations of education (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Milford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, J. D., & Van Patten, J. J. (2007). History of education in America (9th ed.). Upper Saddle Valley, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolling, J. H. (2010). Paradigm analysis of arts-based research and implications for education. Studies in Art Education, 51(2), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck, R. (2005). Shame of the schools. New York Review of Books, 52(6), http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2005/apr/07/the-shame-of-the-schools/.

  • Thompson, M. (2008). Learning-focused solutions that work! Retrieved July 11, 2010, from http://www.learningfocused.com/index.php.

  • Yin Cheong, C., & Mok, M. M. C. (2008). What effective classroom? Towards a paradigm shift. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(4), 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1985). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura G. Sweeney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sweeney, L.G. (2012). Education. In: L'Abate, L. (eds) Paradigms in Theory Construction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0914-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics