Skip to main content

Explicating and Exemplifying Empiricist and Cognitivist Paradigms in the Study of Human Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paradigms in Theory Construction

Abstract

It will come as no surprise to those who engage in research on human learning that the field suffers from definitional, conceptual, and methodological disorder (Hancock, 2007). All too often, researchers in this psychological domain use different terms to say essentially the same thing (or use the same term to mean entirely different things), investigate the relation between two or more constructs without a clear rationale or prediction, or use measures divorced from the nature or process of the phenomena under investigation (Marsh & Hau, 2007). Among the symptoms of this disorder are ambiguous terms (Dinsmore, Alexander & Loughlin, 2010), obfuscated constructs (Alexander, Schallert, & Hare, 1991), atheoretical research (Alexander, 2009), and inaccurate or invalid claims (Robinson, Levin, Thomas, Pituch, & Vaughn, 2007). Treatment of this pervasive and complex disorder is no small feat, requiring multidimensional and multiphasic intervention. One important step toward clarity and precision in the research on human learning, however, is being undertaken in this volume, namely untangling and clarifying the relation among paradigm, theory, and model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackrill, J. L. (1963). Aristotle: Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A. (2009). The need for theory in educational psychology: A case in point. Wellington, New Zealand: Keynote at the Second Educational Psychology Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Reading, T. D., & Laboratory, L. R. (2010). The challenges of developing competent literacy in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2009). Expertise and the adult learner: A historical, psychological, and methodological exploration. In M. C. Smith & N. DeFrates-Densch (Eds.), The handbook of research on adult learning and development (pp. 484–523). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist., 44, 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 123–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1979). Metaphysics, Books I–IX (H. Tredennick, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (1999). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. S., Peleg-Bruckner, Z., & McClintock, A. H. (1985). Effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BonJour, L. (1998). In defense of pure reason: A rationalist account of a priori justification. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Vye, N. J., Stevens, R., Kuhl, P., Schwartz, D., Bell, P., et al. (2006). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (Volume 2). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredo, E. (2006). Conceptual confusion and educational psychology. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (Volume 2). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Milton, Balch & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Riverdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. [Special Issue on Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Historical roots and contemporary manifestations] Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391-409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H. (1970). The “orthodox” view of theories. Remarks in defense as well as critique. In M. Radner & S. Winokur (Eds.), Analyses of theories and methods of physics and psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, G. (1638). Discourses and Mathematical Demonstrations Relating to Two New Sciences (Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche, intorno à due nuove scienze. Leiden, Netherlands: Elsevier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. L. (2005). Aristotle’s metaphysics reconsidered. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 43, 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, E. T., Alexander, P. A., & Ash, M. (1992). Educational psychology: A classroom perspective. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J., Collins, A., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In R. Calfee & D. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. R. (2007). Models for illuminating things otherwise unseen: Co-editor’s introduction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 and 2). New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1912). Essays in radical empiricism. New York: Longmans, Green, & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1955). Pragmatism and four essays from the meaning of truth. New York: Meridian.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1997). Pragmatism’s conception of truth. In L. Menand (Ed.), Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 112–131). New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Abate, L. (2005). Personality in intimate relationships: Socialization and psychopathology. New York: Springer-Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Abate, L. (2009). Paradigms, theories, and models: Two hierarchical frameworks. In L. L’Abate, P. De Giacomo, M. Capitelli, & S. Longo (Eds.), Science, mind and creativity: The Bari symposium (pp. 107–122). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, T. H. (1992). The mythical revolution of American psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1979). An essay concerning human understanding (P. Nidditch, Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1869). On liberty. London: Longman, Roberts & Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K. (2007). The eye of the beholder: The interplay of social and cognitive components in change. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K., Alexander, P. A., Greene, J. A., & Edwards, M. N. (2007). Epistemological threads in the fabric of conceptual change research. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Re-framing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 105–122). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K., Alexander, P. A., & Muis, K. R. (in press). Knowledge and knowing: The journey from philosophy and psychology to human learning. In K. A. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. J. (1987). How we understand art: A cognitive development account of aesthetic experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1958). The fixation of belief. In P. P. Wiener (Ed.), Charles S. Peirce: Selected writings (pp. 91–112). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (2010). The writings of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 9, 1890-1892. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1930). The child’s conception of the world. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original published in 1926.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1993). Republic/Plato (R. Waterfield, Trans.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., & Hau, K.-T. (2007). Applications of latent-variable models in educational psychology: The need for methodology and substantive synergies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2006). Literature reviews of, and for, educational research: A commentary on Boote and Beile‘s Scholars before researchers. Educational Researcher, 35, 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, M. A. (1993). Modeling theory and composing process models. College Composition and Communication, 44, 40–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. H., Levin, J. R., Thomas, G. D., Pituch, K. A., & Vaughn, S. (2007). The incidence of “causal” statements in teaching and learning research journals. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 400–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. D. (Ed.). (1951). Aristotle’s prior and posterior analytics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddell, R. B., Ruddell, M. R., & Singer, H. (Eds.). (1994). Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. (2005). An interview with K. Anders Ericsson. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, E. (1978). Just, values and social science: Unexamined premises. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), Research in law and sociology. Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1978). Information-processing theory of human problem solving. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (pp. 271–295). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1989). Models of thought (Vol. 2). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorupski, J. (1989). John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. M. (1996). Comparing theories of child development (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1903). Educational psychology. New York: Science Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models of reading. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triadafillidis, T. A. (1998). Dominant epistemologies in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (2008). Multiliteracies and metalanguage: Describing image/text relations as a resource for negotiating multimodal texts. In D. Leu, Corio, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on new literacies (377-405). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kraayenoord, C. E., & Paris, S. G. (2002). Reading objects. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on Object-Centered Learning in Museums. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published in 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolterstorff, N. P. (1996). John Locke and ethics of belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra M. Loughlin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loughlin, S.M., Alexander, P.A. (2012). Explicating and Exemplifying Empiricist and Cognitivist Paradigms in the Study of Human Learning. In: L'Abate, L. (eds) Paradigms in Theory Construction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0914-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics