Advertisement

Technologies of Entertainment

Chapter
Part of the The Economics of Information, Communication and Entertainment book series (ECOINFORM, volume 3)

Abstract

Historically, Hollywood has adopted a complex and to a certain extent ambivalent attitude toward emerging media and entertainment technologies, as they were made available. Chapter 7 identifies communication technology revolutions as potentially disruptive changes in the entertainment landscape, and analyzes the evolving regulatory environment and issues, as the rise of non-authorized diffusion of entertainment content in a digital environment.

Keywords

Federal Communication Commission Internet Service Provider Intellectual Property Right Revenue Stream Entertainment Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson C (1994) Hollywood TV: the studio system in the fifties. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur WB (1996) Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harv Bus Rev 74(4):100–110Google Scholar
  3. Balio T (ed) (1990) Hollywood in the age of television. Unwin Hyman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Blume S (2004) The revenue streams: an overview. In: Squire JE (ed) The movie business book. Fireside, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am Econ Rev 75(2):332–338Google Scholar
  6. Faulhaber GR (2007) Network neutrality: the debate evolves. Int J Commun 1:680–700Google Scholar
  7. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (2008) Commission orders Comcast to end discriminatory network management practices [News release]. http://www.fcc.gov. Accessed 5 Aug 2008
  8. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (2010) FCC acts to preserve Internet freedom and openness: action helps ensure robust Internet for consumers, innovation, investment, economic prosperity [News release]. http://www.fcc.gov. Accessed 6 Jan 2011
  9. Frankel D (2008) Home video format war just beginning: blue-ray’s next battle is against standard DVDs. Variety. http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117981786.html. Accessed 14 April 2008
  10. Fritz B (2008) Sony’s Blu-Ray gamble pays off: Conglom is united behind hi-def DVD format. Variety. http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117981781.html. Accessed 14 April 2008
  11. Hilmes M (1990) Pay television: breaking the broadcast bottleneck. In: Balio T (ed) Hollywood in the age of television. Unwin Hyman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Jewell RB (2007) The golden age of cinema: Hollywood 1929–1945. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  13. Lessig L (2004) Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. The Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Levitt T (1975) Marketing myopia. Harv Bus Rev September-October:1–14Google Scholar
  15. Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) (2004) Piracy fact sheet, US overview. http://www.mpaa.org/USPiracyFactsheet/pdf. Accessed 10 June 2006
  16. Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) (2006a) Who piracy hurts. http://www.mpaa.org/piracy.asp. Accessed 30 Nov 2006
  17. Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) (2006b) MPAA says strong content protection will lead to more innovation in movie delivery, press release. http://www.mpaa.org/press_releases/2006_03_29_jf.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2006
  18. Peha JM, Lehr WH, Wilkie S (2007) The state of the debate on net neutrality. Int J Commun 1:709–716Google Scholar
  19. Rosenbluth T (2007) Telecommunications: wireline. Standard & Poors Industry Surveys. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Scripps Institution of Oceanography (2006) New Scripps Study reveals San Andreas fault set for the ‘Big One’. Scripps News. University of California, San Diego. http://scrippsnews.ucsd.edu/Releases/?releaseID=736. Accessed 30 June 2008
  21. US Senate (1982) Copyright infringements (audio and video recorders): hearing on S. 1758 before the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 97th Congress, 1st and 2nd session – testimony of Jack Valenti, president, Motion Picture Association of America, pp 459–485Google Scholar
  22. Sigismondi P (2009) Hollywood piracy in China: an accidental case of US public diplomacy in the globalization age? Chin J Commun 2(3):273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Starr P (2004) The creation of media: political origins of modern communication. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Thussu DK (2006) International communication: continuity and change. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Triplett W (2008a) Hollywood split on net neutrality. Variety. http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117984426.html. Accessed 5 Aug 2008
  26. Triplett W (2008b) FCC votes against Comcast policy: corp under fire in net neutrality case. Variety. http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117989968.html. Accessed 5 Aug 2008
  27. Weinberg CB (2005) Profits out of the picture: research issues and revenue sources beyond the North American box office. In: Moul CC (ed) A concise handbook of movie industry economics. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. White TR (1990) Hollywood’s attempt at appropriating television: the case of Paramount Pictures. In: Balio T (ed) Hollywood in the age of television. Unwin Hyman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams R (1975) Television: technology and cultural form. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Annenberg School for Communication & JournalismUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations