Skip to main content

Transfer to Adult Court: Enhancing Clinical Forensic Evaluations and Informing Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Transfer to adult court is a complex issue that has not yet received sufficient research attention. Transfer raises many salient questions for mental health professionals working within the juvenile justice system such as what risk a youth may pose to the community, how (im)mature the youth’s decision making is, as well as the chief question of whether youth can be reformed. These questions encapsulate the essence of all juvenile justice youth evaluations, but are at a heightened level of importance in transfer cases. Despite meager numbers of research articles on this topic, in the past decade, significant strides have been made toward better understanding the transfer of juveniles to adult court. For instance, Melton et al. (2007) produced an informative chapter to address the issue of transfer to adult court where they focused on amenability to treatment assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     For the purposes of this chapter, the term youthful offenders will be used interchangeably with the term juvenile offenders and refers to offenders aged 17 years and younger.

  2. 2.

     The prediction of future dangerousness can be either used to describe broad offending (general offending) or to describe prediction of future violence (Kruh and Brodsky 1997); clinicians would have to specific what estimates they were examining when providing estimates for dangerousness.

  3. 3.

     Clinicians may consider referring to a growing line of research examining fMRI research; efforts have been made to demonstrate that brain functioning in adolescents is different from that of adults. However, conclusions in this field often refer to culpability in areas where the science is not adequately designed to address culpability (see Aronson 2007). Therefore, we would argue that that best way for psychologists to assist the courts is to examine developmental maturity in the context of the other variables they believe to be pertinent.

References

  • Adams, B., & Addie, S. (2009). Delinquency cases waived to criminal court, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/230167.pdf.

  • Adams, B., & Addie, S. (2010). Delinquency cases waived to criminal court, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/224539.pdf.

  • Andershed, H. (2010). Stability and change of psychopathic traits: What do we know? In R. T. Salekin & D. R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 233–250). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J. D. (2007). Brain imaging, culpability and the juvenile death penalty. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 115–142. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.13.2.115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Johnson, K. D., & Gregoriou, M. (2000). Juveniles in adult prisons and jails: A national assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/182503.pdf.

  • Barker, T. D., Trentacosta, C., & Salekin, R. T. (2011). Are impulsive adolescents differentially influenced by the good and bad of neighborhood and family? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(4), 981–986. doi:10.1037/ a 0022878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellak, L., & Bellak, S. (1982). A manual for the children’s apperception test. New York: CPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, B. E., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Laub, J. H. (2009). Predicting trajectories of offending over the life course: Findings from a Dutch conviction cohort. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 468–494. doi:10.1177/0022427809341939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. M. (2000). Juvenile offenders in the adult criminal justice system. Crime and Justice, 27, 81–167. doi:10.1086/652199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. M., Frazier, C. E., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Winner, L. (1996). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Does it make a difference? Crime and Delinquency, 42, 171–191. doi:10.1177/0011128796042002001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Book, A. S., Clark, H. J., Forth, A. E., & Hare, R. D. (2006). The Psychopathy checklist-revised and the psychopathy checklist: Youth version. In R. P. Archer (Ed.), Forensic uses of clinical assessment instruments (pp. 147–179). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, R., & Verhaagen, D. (2006). Assessing and managing violence risk in juveniles. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2005). Structured assessment of violence risk in youth. In T. Grisso, G. Vincent, & D. Seagrave (Eds.), Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice (pp. 311–323). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, D. N., Salekin, R. T., Zapf, P. A., Salekin, K. L., Kubak, F. A., & DeCoster, J. (2006). Transfer to adult court: A national study of how juvenile court judges weigh pertinent Kent criteria. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 332–355. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.12.3.332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, J. (2008a). Examining the influence of Matza’s principles of justice and their impact on reverse waiver decisions: Has Kadi-(in)justice survived? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, 59–82. doi:10.1177/1541204007308422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, J. (2008b). Reverse waiver and the effects of legal, statutory, and secondary legal factors on sentencing outcomes for juvenile offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 54, 34–64. doi:10.1177/0011128707306687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M., Skeem, J. L., Salekin, R. T., & Van Rybroek, G. (2006). Treatment response of adolescent offenders with psychopathy features: A 2-year follow-up. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 571–596. doi:10.1177/ 0093854806288176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 741–760. doi:10.1002/bsl.416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, R. R., Vincent, G. M., Hart, S. D., & Cohen, I. M. (2004). Predictive validity of the psychopathy checklist: Youth version for general and violent recidivism. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 5–22. doi:10.1002/bsl.574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruise, K. R., Fernandez, K., McCoy, W. K., Guy, L. S., Colwell, L. H., & Douglas, T. R. (2008). The influence of psychosocial maturity on adolescent offenders’ delinquent behavior. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6, 178–194. doi:10.1177/1541204007313229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Cruise, K. R., & Cauffman, E. (2001). Assessment of “juvenile psychopathy” and its association with violence: A critical review. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 53–80. doi:10.1002/bsl.425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, C. P. (1990). Juveniles or adults? Forensic assessment of juveniles considered for trial in criminal court. Forensic Reports, 3(1), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezell, M. E., & Cohen, L. E. (2005). Desisting from crime: Continuity and change in long-term crime patterns of serious chronic offenders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. (2008). Juvenile crime and criminal justice: Resolving border disputes. The Future of Children, 18, 81–118. doi:10.1353/foc.0.0014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Jollife, D., & Pardini, D. A. (2008). Promotive and risk processes at different life stages. In R. Loeber, D. P. Farrington, M. Stouthamer-Loeber, & H. R. White (Eds.), Violence and serious theft: Development and prediction from childhood to adulthood (pp. 169–230). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W., Stein, S., & Heikkinen, K. (2009). Narrow assessments misrepresent development and misguide policy: Comment on Steinberg, Cauffman, Woolard, Graham, and Banich (2009). American Psychologist, 64, 595–600. doi:10.1037/a0017105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, M. G. (1980). An assessment of the national incidence of juvenile suicide in adult jails, lockups, and juvenile detention centers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED199625.pdf.

  • Forst, M., Fagan, J., & Vivona, T. S. (1989). Youth in ­prisons and training schools: Perceptions and ­consequences of the treatment-custody dichotomy. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 40(1), 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6988.1989.tb00634.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forth, A. E., & Book, A. S. (2010). Psychopathic traits in children and adolescents: The relationship with antisocial behaviors and aggression. In R. T. Salekin & D. R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and ­adolescent psychopathy (pp. 251–283). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare, R. D. (2003). The Psychopathy checklist: Youth version manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, P. J., Kimonis, E. R., Dandreaux, D. M., & Farell, J. M. (2003). The 4 year stability of psychopathic traits in non-referred youth. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 713–736. doi:10.1002/bsl.568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gretton, H. M., Hare, R. D., & Catchpole, R. E. (2004). Psychopathy and offending from adolescence to adulthood: A 10-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 636–645. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.4.636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (2008). “Transfer Provisions.” State Juvenile Justice Profiles. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice. Online. Retrieved from http://www.ncjj.org/stateprofiles/.

  • Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (2000). Forensic clinical evaluations related to waiver of jurisdiction. In J. Fagan & F. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice (pp. 13–43). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1992). Is it unethical to offer predictions of future violence? Law and Human Behavior, 16, 621–633. doi:10.1007/BF01884019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., Tomkins, A., & Casey, P. (1988). Psychosocial concepts in juvenile law. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 403–437. doi:10.1007/BF01044626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., Vincent, G., & Seagrave, D. (Eds.). (2005). Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., McGowan, A., Liverman, A., Crosby, A., Fullilove, M., Johnson, R., et al. (2007). Effects on ­violence of laws and policies facilitating the transfer of youth from the juvenile to the adult justice system: A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventative Services. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control, National Center for Health Marketing, Division of Health Communications. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5609a1.htm.

  • Harris, A. (2008). The social construction of “sophisticated” adolescents: How judges integrate juvenile and criminal justice decision-making models. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37, 469–506. doi:10.1177/0891241607309886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, K., Leheny, C., Thomas, L., & Huneycutt, D. (1997). A national survey of U.S. statutes on juvenile transfer: Implications for policy and practice. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 15, 125–149. doi:doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199721)15:2<125::AID-BSL265>3.0.CO;2-R.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, R. (2005). Youth Level of service/case management inventory. In T. Grisso, G. Vincent, & D. Seagrave (Eds.), Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice (pp. 81–95). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. C. (1997). Juvenile justice and youth violence. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. L., & Myers, D. L. (2007). The decertification of transferred youth: Examining the determinants of reverse waiver. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 188–206. doi:10.1177/1541204006295150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalogerakis, M. (1992). Violent juveniles. In M. Kalogerakis (Ed.), Handbook of psychiatric practice in the juvenile court (pp. 111–119). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, F., & Muthen, B. (2008). Analyzing criminal trajectory profile: Bridging multilevel and group-based approaches using growth mixture modeling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 1–31. doi:10.1007/s10940-007-9036-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruh, I. P., & Brodsky, S. (1997). Clinical evaluations for transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Current practices and future research. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 15, 151–165. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199721)15:2<151::AID-BSL267>3.0.CO;2-U.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krysik, J., & LeCroy, C. W. (2002). The empirical validation of an instrument to predict risk of recidivism among juvenile offenders. Research on Social Work Practice, 12, 71–81. doi:10.1177/104973150201200106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurlycheck, M. C., & Johnson, B. D. (2004). The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile and young adult ­sentencing outcomes in criminal court. Criminology, 42, 485–517. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00527.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza-Kaduce, L., Lane, J., Bishop, D. M., & Frazier, C. E. (1995). Juvenile offenders and adult felony recidivism: The impact of transfer. Journal of Crime and Justice, 28, 59–77. Retrieved from http://www.cech.uc.edu/criminaljustice/journals/jcj/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leistico, A. R., & Salekin, R. T. (2003). Testing the reliability and validity of the Risk, Sophistication-Maturity, and Treatment Amenability Instrument (RST-i): An assessment tool for juvenile offenders. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2, 101–117. Retrieved from http://www.iafmhs.org/iafmhs.asp?pg = journal.

  • Leistico, A. R., Salekin, R. T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9096-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, M., Stewart, A., Allard, T., & Ogilvie, J. (2008). Understanding juvenile offending trajectories. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41, 345–363. doi:10.1375/acri.41.3.345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R. (1990). Development and risk factors of ­juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 1–41. doi:10.1016/ 0272-7358(90)90105-J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loving, J. L., & Patapis, N. S. (2007). Evaluating juvenile amenability to treatment: Integrating statutes and case law into clinical practice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 7, 67–78. doi:10.1300/J158v07n01_07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio, A. M., Little, M., Chassin, L., Knight, G. P., Piquero, A. R., et al. (2009). Juvenile offenders’ alcohol and marijuana trajectories: Risk and protective factor effects in the context of time in a supervised facility. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, ­440–453. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9324-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrilla, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, J. R., & Schmidt, F. (2008). Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) with juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 344–355. doi:10.1177/ 0093854807311972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 4, 674–701. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (2007). A review of the research on the taxonomy of life-course persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In D. J. Flannery, A. T. Vazsonyi, & I. D. Waldman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression (pp. 49–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. P. (2009). Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45, ­1654–1668. doi:10.1037/a0015862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, E. (1984). Judging amenability to treatment in juvenile offenders: Theory and practice. In N. Reppucci, L. Weithorn, E. Mulvey, & J. Monahan (Eds.), Children, mental health, and the law (pp. ­321–352). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, E. P. (2005). Risk assessment in juvenile justice policy and practice. In K. Heilbrun, N. E. Goldstein, & R. E. Redding (Eds.), Juvenile delinquency: Prevention, assessment, and intervention (pp. 209–231). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, E. P., & Iselin, A. R. (2008). Improving professional judgments of risk and amenability in juvenile justice. The Future of Children, 18(2), 35–57. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/futureofchildren/publications/journals/journal_details/index.xml?journalid =31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic apperception test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrie, D. C., Cornell, D. G., Kaplan, S., McConville, D., & Levy-Ekon, A. (2004). Psychopathy scores and violence among juvenile offenders: A multi-measure study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 49–67. doi:10.1002/bsl.573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. (2005). Juvenile delinquency guidelines: Improving court practice in juvenile delinquency cases. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ncjfcj.org/images/stories/dept/ppcd/pdf/JDG/juveniledelinquencyguidelinescompressed.pdf.

  • Otis v. State, 142 S.W.3d 615 (Ark. 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.K.M. v. State. 780 P.2d 395 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, S. R., & Moretti, M. M. (2005). The transfer of juveniles to adult court in Canada and the United States: Confused agendas and compromised assessment procedures. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 4(1), 19–37. Retrieved from http://www.iafmhs.org/files/Penneyspr05.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Blumstein, A., Brame, R., Haapanen, R., Mulvey, E. P., & Nagin, D. S. (2001). Assessing the impact of exposure time and incapacitation on longitudinal trajectories of criminal offending. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 54–74. doi:10.1177/0743558401161005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulos, T. M., & Orchowsky, S. (1994). Serious juvenile offenders: Predicting the probability of transfer to criminal court. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 3–17. doi:10.1177/0011128794040001001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, R. E. (2003). The effects of adjudicating and sentencing juveniles as adults: Research and policy implications. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1, 128–155. doi:10.1177/1541204002250875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, R. E. (2010). Juvenile transfer laws: An effective deterrent to delinquency? Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/220595.pdf.

  • Roid, G. (2003). Stanford-Binet intelligence scales (5th ed.): Technical Manual. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, C., Hartsone, E., Fagan, J., & Moore, M. (1986). Violent youth in adult court: Process and punishment. Crime and Delinquency, 32, 75–96. doi:10.1177/0011128786032001005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T. (2002). Clinical evaluation of youth considered for transfer to adult criminal court: Refining practice and directions for science. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 55–72. doi:10.1300/J158v02n01_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T. (2004). Risk-sophistication-treatment inventory: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T. (2010). Treatment of child and adolescent psychopathy: Focusing on change. In R. T. Salekin & D. R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 343–373). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T., & Grimes, R. (2008). Clinical forensic evaluations for juvenile transfer to adult criminal court. In R. Jackson (Ed.), Learning forensic assessment (pp. 313–346). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T., & Lynam, D. R. (2010). Child and adolescent psychopathy: The road ahead. In R. T. Salekin & D. R. Lynam (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 401–419). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Ustad, K. L. (2001). Juvenile waiver to adult criminal courts: Prototypes for dangerousness, sophistication-maturity, and amenability to treatment. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7, ­381–408. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.2.381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T., Yff, R. M., Neumann, C. S., Leistico, A. R., & Zalot, A. A. (2002). Juvenile transfer to adult courts: A look at the prototypes for dangerousness, sophistication-maturity, and amenability to treatment through a legal lens. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 373–410. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.8.4.373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T., Salekin, K. L., Clements, C. B., & Leistico, A. R. (2005). Risk-sophistication-treatment inventory. In T. Grisso, G. Vincent, & D. Seagrave (Eds.), Mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice (pp. 341–356). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T., Lee, Z., Schrum-Dillard, C. L., & Kubak, F. A. (2010a). Child psychopathy and protective factors: IQ and motivation-to-change. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 16, 158–176. doi:10.1037/a0019233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salekin, R. T., Worley, C. B., & Grimes, R. (2010b). Treatment of psychopathy: A review and brief introduction to the mental models approach. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 235–266. doi:10.1002/bsl.928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55, 609–627. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schetky, D., & Benedek, E. (2002). Principles and practice of child and adolescent forensic psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, C. S., Fraser, M. W., & Day, S. H. (2007). Predictive validity of the Joint Risk Matrix with juvenile offenders: A focus on gender and race/ethnicity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 348–361. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00997.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. S., & Steinberg, L. (2008). Rethinking juvenile justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, B. G., & Arrigo, B. A. (2009). Criminology: Adolescent transfer, developmental maturity, and adjudicative competence: An ethical and justice policy inquiry. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(2), 435–487. Retrieved from http://www.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/backissues/v99/n2/9902_435.Sellers.Arrigo.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S. L., & McDowall, D. M. (1988). Criminalizing delinquency: The deterrent effects of the New York Juvenile Offender Law. Law and Society Review, 22, 521–535. doi:10.2307/3053628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobogin, C. (1999). Treating kids right: Deconstructing and reconstructing the amenability to treatment ­concept. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 10, ­299–333. Retrieved from http://www.sandiego.edu/law/news/blogs_publications/publications/journals/contemporary/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 National report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/ojstatbb/nr2006/downloads/NR2006.pdf.

  • Spice, A., Viljoen, J. L., Gretton, H. M., & Roesch, R. (2010). Psychological assessment for adult sentencing of juvenile offenders: An evaluation of the RSTI and the SAVRY. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9, 124–137. doi:10.1080/14999013.2010.501846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249–272. doi:10.1007/BF01499023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Woolard, J., Graham, S., & Banich, M. (2009). Are adolescents less mature than adults: Minor’s access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA “Flip-Flop”. American Psychologist, 64, 583–594. doi:10.1037/a0014763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, B. (2009). The effects of juvenile transfer to criminal court on incarceration decisions. Justice Quarterly, 26, 77–106. Retrieved from http://www.acjs.org/pubs/167_669_2916.cfm.

  • Steiner, B., & Wright, E. (2006). Assessing the relative effects of state direct file waiver laws on violent juvenile crime: Deterrence or irrelevance? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 96(2), 1451–1478. Retrieved from http://www.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/backissues/96-4.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, D. S. (2000). The evolution of transfer out of the juvenile court. In J. Fagan & F. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice (pp. 13–43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbet, P., Gable, R., Hurst, H., Montgomery, I., Szymanski, L., & Thomas, D. (1996). State responses to serious and violent juvenile crime. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/statresp.pdf.

  • Turner, S., & Fain, T. (2006). Validation of the risk and resiliency assessment tool for juveniles in the Los Angeles county probation system. Federal Probation, 70(2), 49–57. Retrieved from http://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/ProbationPretrialServies/FederalProbationJournal/FederalProbationJournal.aspx?doc=/uscourts/FederalCourts/PPS/Fedprob/2006-09/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Geest, V., Blokland, A., & Bijleveld, C. (2009). Delinquent development in a sample of high-risk youth: Shape, content, and predictors of delinquent trajectories from age 12 to 32. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 111–143. doi:10.1177/0022427808331115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children – Fourth Edition: Technical and ­interpretive manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, I., & Hess, A. (2006). The handbook of forensic psychology. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. L., Schmidt, F., McKinnon, L., Cattha, H. K., & Meyers, J. R. (2008). A comparative study of ­adolescent risk assessment instruments: Predictive and ­incremental validity. Assessment, 15, 104–115. doi:10.1177/1073191107307966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West, H. C., & Sabol, W. J. (2009). Prison inmates at midyear – 2008 – Statistical tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/pim08st.pdf.

  • Wiebush, R. G., Baird, C., Krisberg, B., & Onek, D. (1995). Risk assessment and classification for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.), Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders (pp. 171–212). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L., Lanza-Kaduce, L., Bishop, D. M., & Frazier, C. E. (1997). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Reexamining recidivism over the long term. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 548–563. doi:10.1177/0011128797043004009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, P. H. (2003). Transfer of juveniles to adult court: The case of H. H. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 9, 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Rolling Meadows: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, J. L., Odgers, C., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Daglis, H. (2005). Juveniles within adult correctional settings: Legal pathways and developmental considerations. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 4(1), 1–18. Retrieved from http://www.iafmhs.org/files/Woolardspr05.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E. (1998). American youth violence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra R. Chen MA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, D.R., Salekin, R.T. (2012). Transfer to Adult Court: Enhancing Clinical Forensic Evaluations and Informing Policy. In: Grigorenko, E. (eds) Handbook of Juvenile Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0905-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics