Surface Optics

  • David D. Nolte
Part of the Bioanalysis book series (BIOANALYSIS, volume 1)


Many optical biosensors detect molecules that either are attached to a surface, or are in close proximity to one. Therefore, understanding the optical properties of surfaces, and how these properties affect molecular interferometry, is a central topic of this book. Surfaces are planes of dielectric discontinuity that split the amplitude of waves into transmitted and reflected partial waves (Fig. 4.1). Surfaces impose electromagnetic boundary conditions that produce constructive or destructive interference of the incident and reflected waves. On the wrong type of surface (unity reflection with a π phase shift, as for a metal surface), a thin protein film can be entirely invisible to an incident plane wave (but not a surface wave), because the electric field strength at the molecular layer is canceled by destructive interference between the incident and reflected waves. In this situation, a light wave can pass right through the layer without ever polarizing it, and hence never sensing any change in the optical path length. This is perhaps the oldest and simplest form of optical cloaking [1].


Reflection Coefficient Partial Wave Optical Path Length Scattered Field Phase Quadrature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Selected Bibliography

Selected Bibliography

  1. Heavens, O.S.: Optical Properties of Thin Solid Films. Dover, New York (1991) (An old classic on thin films)Google Scholar
  2. Maier, S.A.: Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer, New York (2007) (A good modern review of plasmonics)Google Scholar


  1. 1.
    Ergin, T., Stenger, N., Brenner, P., Pendry, J.B., Wegener, M.: Three-dimensional invisibility cloak at optical wavelengths. Science 328, 337–339 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, X., Zhao, M., Nolte, D.D.: Common-path interferometric detection of protein on the BioCD. Appl. Opt. 46, 7836–7849 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jenison, R., La, H., Haeberli, A., Ostroff, R., Polisky, B.: Silicon-based biosensors for rapid detection of protein or nucleic acid targets. Clin. Chem. 47, 1894–1900 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao, M., Wang, X., Nolte, D.D.: Molecular interferometric imaging. Opt. Express 16, 7102–7118 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ozkumur, E., Yalcin, A., Cretich, M., Lopez, C.A., Bergstein, D.A., Goldberg, B.B., Chiari, M., Unlu, M.S.: Quantification of DNA and protein adsorption by optical phase shift. Biosens. Bioelectron. 25, 167–172 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de la Pena, J.L., Gonzalez, F., Saiz, J.M., Moreno, F., Valle, P.J.: Application of a double-interaction model to the backscattering from particulate surfaces. Opt. Eng. 38, 1017–1023 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nebeker, B.M., de la Pena, J.L., Hirleman, E.D.: Comparisons of the discrete-dipole approximation and modified double interaction model methods to predict light scattering from small features on surfaces. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 70, 749–759 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Homola, J.: Surface Plasmon Resonance Based Sensors. Springer, Berlin (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schasfoort, R.B.M.: Handbook of Surface Plasmon Resonance. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David D. Nolte
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations