Skip to main content

Graft Selection for Revision ACL Reconstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revision ACL Reconstruction

Abstract

Although primary ACL reconstructions have been considered a successful operation, success rates have still only ranged from 75 to 97 %. Consequently, several thousand revision ACL reconstructions are performed annually. Failures include frank graft rupture and structural failure as well as functional failure with residual instability and pivoting despite the presence of an intact graft. When planning a revision ACL reconstruction, one of the most important considerations is the graft choice. Despite the prevalence of revision ACL reconstruction, there is no universally agreed upon graft choice. Generally, autografts are the preferred graft for revision ACL reconstructions due to their more rapid and complete incorporation into the host tissue, but allograft tissue is used if there are limited autograft options available or if autograft use is relatively contraindicated secondary to patellofemoral pathology. This chapter will focus on the qualities of the different graft sources available (autografts, allografts, and synthetic grafts) along with the advantages and disadvantages of each option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Miller SL, Gladstone JN. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:675–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. West RV, Harner CD. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:197–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright RW, Huston LJ, Spindler KP, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1979–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bach Jr BR, Aadalen KJ, Dennis MG, et al. Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fresh-frozen, nonirradiated patellar tendon allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:284–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedi A, Feeley BT, Williams III RJ. Management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:994–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tom JA, Rodeo SA. Soft tissue allografts for knee reconstruction in sports medicine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:135–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, D’Andria S, et al. Patellofemoral problems after intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;288:195–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, et al. Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:211–7; discussion 217–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bonamo JJ, Krinick RM, Sporn AA. Rupture of the patellar ligament after use of its central third for anterior cruciate reconstruction. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:1294–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Christen B, Jakob RP. Fractures associated with patellar ligament grafts in cruciate ligament surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:617–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, et al. Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in ACL reconstruction with the hamstrings technique: clinical and electrophysiological study. Knee. 2008;15:360–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleipool AE, van Loon T, Marti RK. Pain after use of the central third of the patellar tendon for cruciate ligament reconstruction. 33 patients followed 2–3 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:62–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marumoto JM, Mitsunaga MM, Richardson AB, et al. Late patellar tendon ruptures after removal of the central third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A report of two cases. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:698–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubinstein Jr RA, Shelbourne KD, VanMeter CD, et al. Isolated autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft site morbidity. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:324–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sachs RA, Daniel DM, Stone ML, et al. Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17:760–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen SB, Sekiya JK. Allograft safety in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2007;26:597–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaeding CC, Aros B, Pedroza A, et al. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: predictors of failure from a MOON prospective longitudinal cohort. Sports Health. 2011;3:73–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McAllister DR, Joyce MJ, Mann BJ, et al. Allograft update: the current status of tissue regulation, procurement, processing, and sterilization. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:2148–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vangsness CT, Jr., Dellamaggiora RD. Current safety sterilization and tissue banking issues for soft tissue allografts. Clin Sports Med. 2009;28:183–9, vii.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Hepatitis C virus transmission from an antibody-negative organ and tissue donor—United States, 2000–2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(13):273–4, 276.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Invasive Streptococcus pyogenes after allograft implantation—Colorado, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(48):1174–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cartwright EJ, Prabhu RM, Zinderman CE, et al. Transmission of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica (formerly Chryseobacterium meningosepticum) to tissue-allograft recipients: a report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1501–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kainer MA, Linden JV, Whaley DN, et al. Clostridium infections associated with musculoskeletal-tissue allografts. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2564–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mroz TE, Joyce MJ, Steinmetz MP, et al. Musculoskeletal allograft risks and recalls in the United States. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:559–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Simonds RJ, Holmberg SD, Hurwitz RL, et al. Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from a seronegative organ and tissue donor. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:726–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Buck BE, Malinin TI, Brown MD. Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;240:129–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller BS, Wojtys EM. Basic science aspects of the use of allografts in revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2005;13:3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pruss A, Monig HJ. Current standards in tissue banking. ISBT Sci Ser. 2010;5:148–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vaishnav S, Thomas Vangsness Jr C, Dellamaggiora R. New techniques in allograft tissue processing. Clin Sports Med. 2009;28:127–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fideler BM, Vangsness Jr CT, Moore T, et al. Effects of gamma irradiation on the human immunodeficiency virus. A study in frozen human bone-patellar ligament-bone grafts obtained from infected cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1032–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fideler BM, Vangsness Jr CT, Lu B, et al. Gamma irradiation: effects on biomechanical properties of human bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:643–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jackson DW, Windler GE, Simon TM. Intraarticular reaction associated with the use of freeze-dried, ethylene oxide-sterilized bone-patella tendon-bone allografts in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:1–10; discussion 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jackson DW, Simon TM, Kurzweil PR, et al. Survival of cells after intra-articular transplantation of fresh allografts of the patellar and anterior cruciate ligaments. DNA-probe analysis in a goat model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:112–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Malinin TI, Levitt RL, Bashore C, et al. A study of retrieved allografts used to replace anterior cruciate ligaments. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:163–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jackson DW, Corsetti J, Simon TM. Biologic incorporation of allograft anterior cruciate ligament replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:126–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jackson DW, Grood ES, Goldstein JD, et al. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:176–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Cincinnati. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;325:116–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Grossman MG, ElAttrache NS, Shields CL, et al. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: three- to nine-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:418–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Uribe JW, Hechtman KS, Zvijac JE, et al. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Miami. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;325:91–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Battaglia II MJ, Cordasco FA, Hannafin JA, et al. Results of revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:2057–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gulotta LV, Rodeo SA. Biology of autograft and allograft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med. 2007;26:509–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Papageorgiou CD, Ma CB, Abramowitch SD, et al. A multidisciplinary study of the healing of an intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament graft in a goat model. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:620–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tomita F, Yasuda K, Mikami S, et al. Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:461–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Goldstein JL, Verma N, McNickle AG, et al. Avoiding mismatch in allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: correlation between patient height and patellar tendon length. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:643–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor DE, Dervin GF, Keene GC. Femoral bone plug recession in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1996;12:513–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Verma N, Noerdlinger MA, Hallab N, et al. Effects of graft rotation on initial biomechanical failure characteristics of bone-patellar tendon-bone constructs. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:708–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, et al. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:444–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, et al. A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:348–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Feller JA, Webster KE. A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:564–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Forster MC, Forster IW. Patellar tendon or four-strand hamstring? A systematic review of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2005;12:225–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Roe J, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, et al. A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1337–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Shaieb MD, Kan DM, Chang SK, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:214–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee GH, McCulloch P, Cole BJ, et al. The incidence of acute patellar tendon harvest complications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:162–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Stein DA, Hunt SA, Rosen JE, et al. The incidence and outcome of patella fractures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:578–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Colosimo AJ, Heidt Jr RS, Traub JA, et al. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a reharvested ipsilateral patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:746–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. O’Shea JJ, Shelbourne KD. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a reharvested bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:208–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kartus J, Stener S, Lindahl S, et al. Ipsi- or contralateral patellar tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery. A comparison of two methods. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:499–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Liden M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, et al. The course of the patellar tendon after reharvesting its central third for ACL revision surgery: a long-term clinical and radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:1130–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Salmon LJ, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, et al. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: 5- to 9-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1604–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wipfler B, Donner S, Zechmann CM, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon: a prospective comparative study with 9-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:653–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Leys T, Salmon L, Waller A, et al. Clinical results and risk factors for reinjury 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:595–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Reinhardt KR, Hetsroni I, Marx RG. Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I systematic review comparing failure rates and functional outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41:249–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Park MJ, Lee MC, Seong SC. A comparative study of the healing of tendon autograft and tendon-bone autograft using patellar tendon in rabbits. Int Orthop. 2001;25:35–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Goradia VK, Rochat MC, Grana WA, et al. Tendon-to-bone healing of a semitendinosus tendon autograft used for ACL reconstruction in a sheep model. Am J Knee Surg. 2000;13:143–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Grana WA, Egle DM, Mahnken R, et al. An analysis of autograft fixation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a rabbit model. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:344–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Rodeo SA, Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, et al. Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1795–803.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Withrow TJ, Huston LJ, Wojtys EM, et al. Effect of varying hamstring tension on anterior cruciate ligament strain during in vitro impulsive knee flexion and compression loading. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:815–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: results using a quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:553–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Barrett GR, Field LD. Comparison of patella tendon versus patella tendon/Kennedy ligament augmentation device for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: study of results, morbidity, and complications. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:624–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Moyen BJ, Jenny JY, Mandrino AH, et al. Comparison of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without a Kennedy ligament-augmentation device. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1313–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Noyes FR, Barber SD. The effect of a ligament-augmentation device on allograft reconstructions for chronic ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:960–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Paulos LE, Rosenberg TD, Grewe SR, et al. The GORE-TEX anterior cruciate ligament prosthesis. A long-term followup. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:246–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Wredmark T, Engstrom B. Five-year results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Stryker Dacron high-strength ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993;1:71–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Haut Donahue TL, Howell SM, Hull ML, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of anterior and posterior tibialis tendons as suitable single-loop anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:589–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Pearsall IV AW, Hollis JM, Russell Jr GV, et al. A biomechanical comparison of three lower extremity tendons for ligamentous reconstruction about the knee. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:1091–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. King W, Mangan D, Endean T, et al. Microbial sterilization and viral inactivation in soft tissue allografts using novel applications of high-dose gamma irradiation. In: Presented at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA, March 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Hamner DL, Brown Jr CH, Steiner ME, et al. Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:549–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, et al. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:344–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Kim DH, Wilson DR, Hecker AT, et al. Twisting and braiding reduces the tensile strength and stiffness of human hamstring tendon grafts used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:861–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Harris NL, Smith DA, Lamoreaux L, et al. Central quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: morphometric and biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:23–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asheesh Bedi MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilde, J., Bedi, A., Altchek, D.W. (2014). Graft Selection for Revision ACL Reconstruction. In: Marx, R. (eds) Revision ACL Reconstruction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0766-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0766-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0765-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0766-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics