Advertisement

Women’s Imaging in Global Health Radiology

  • Kathryn Everton
  • Anna Starikovsky Nordvig
  • Christina M. Cinelli
  • Niranjan Khandelwal
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on women’s imaging after the child-bearing years, concentrating on imaging for breast cancer screening and diagnosis, and dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis screening. Key concepts include the changing epidemiology of breast cancer and osteoporosis in low- and middle-income countries, development of comprehensive multidisciplinary breast and bone care programs, best-practice health care guidelines in limited-resource settings, mobile imaging as a tool to provide improved access for urban and rural marginalized women, and a description of Asha Jyoti (Ray of Hope in Hindi and Punjabi), a Women’s Mobile Health Care Program. Asha Jyoti is a collaboration between RAD-AID, the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research in Chandigarh, India, and Philips Healthcare. The program packages key screening tests in a mobile unit aimed at women 45 years and older to create a sustainable and reproducible health care model.

Keywords

Breast Cancer Bone Mineral Density Breast Cancer Screening Bone Mineral Density Testing Clinical Breast Exam 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Powell A. Breast cancer danger rising in developing world. 2009. p. 1–2. http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2009/04/breast-cancer-danger-rising-in-developing-world/
  2. 2.
    Knaul F, Nigenda G, Lozano R, Arreolaornelas H, Langer A, Frenk J. Breast cancer in Mexico: a pressing priority. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16(32):113–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dhillon PK, Yeole BB, Dikshit R, Kurkure AP, Bray F. Trends in breast, ovarian and cervical cancer incidence in Mumbai, India over a 30-year period, 1976-2005: an age-period-cohort analysis. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(5):723–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leonard M. Old wine in new bottles? Women working inside and outside the household. Womens Stud Int Forum. 2001;24(1):67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernández R. Culture as learning: the evolution of female labor force participation over a century. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2007.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chia K-S, Reilly M, Tan C-S, Lee J, Pawitan Y, Adami H-O, et al. Profound changes in breast cancer incidence may reflect changes into a Westernized lifestyle: a comparative population-based study in Singapore and Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2004;113(2):302–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Porter P. “Westernizing” women’s risks? Breast cancer in lower-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(3):213–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parkin DM, Nambooze S, Wabwire-Mangen F, Wabinga HR. Changing cancer incidence in Kampala, Uganda, 1991-2006. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(5):1187–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lane DS, Zapka J, Breen N, Messina CR, Fotheringham DJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: the case of breast cancer screening among older women. Prev Med. 2000;31(5):481–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hayward RA, Shapiro MF, Freeman HE, Corey CR. Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(5):1177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lambe M, Wigertz A, Holmqvist M, Adolfsson J, Bardage C, Fornander T, et al. Reductions in use of hormone replacement therapy: effects on Swedish breast cancer incidence trends only seen after several years. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;121(3):679–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katalinic A, Rawal R. Decline in breast cancer incidence after decrease in utilisation of hormone replacement therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;107(3):427–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Canfell K, Banks E, Moa AM, Beral V. Decrease in breast cancer incidence following a rapid fall in use of hormone replacement therapy in Australia. Med J Aust. 2008;188(11):641–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N, Berg CD, Chlebowski RT, Feuer EJ, et al. The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(16):1670–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agarwal G, Ramakant P. Breast cancer care in India: the current scenario and the challenges for the future. Breast Care (Basel). 2008;3(1):21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coughlin SS, Ekwueme DU. Breast cancer as a global health concern. Cancer Epidemiol. 2009;33(5):315–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dhar A. India likely to miss MDG on maternal health. Health. New Delhi: The Hindu; 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(9):646–56.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    on behalf of the IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life, Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, et al. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(9):2239–56.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kanis J. WHO scientific group on the assessment of osteoporosis at primary health care level. Brussels; 2007.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Osteoporosis Fact Sheet. International Osteoporosis Foundation. http://www.iofbonehealth.org/ accessed on October 25, 2011
  23. 23.
    Anderson BO, Distelhorst SR. Guidelines for international breast health and cancer control - Implemenation. CANCER Supplement, 2008;113(8).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yip C-H, Smith RA, Anderson BO, Miller AB, Thomas DB, Ang E-S, et al. Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: early detection resource allocation. Cancer. 2008;113(8 Suppl):2244–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Allen TL, Van Groningen BJ, Barksdale DJ, McCarthy R. The breast self-examination controversy: what providers and patients should know. J Nurse Pract. 2010;6(6):444–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kosters JP, Gotzsche P. Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. A Cochrane review prepared by The Cochrane Collaboration. Published in the Cochrane Library, 2008, Issue 4.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shulman LN, Willett W, Sievers A, Knaul FM. Breast cancer in developing countries: opportunities for improved survival. J Oncol. 2010;2010:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miller AB. Practical applications for clinical breast examination (CBE) and breast self-examination (BSE) in screening and early detection of breast cancer. Breast Care (Basel). 2008;3(1):17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, Wang WW, Allison CJ, Chen FL, et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(19):1445–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Semiglazov VF, Manikhas AG, Moiseenko VM, Protsenko SA, Kharikova RS, Seleznev IK, et al. [Results of a prospective randomized investigation [Russia (St. Petersburg)/WHO] to evaluate the significance of self-examination for the early detection of breast cancer]. Vopr Onkol. 2003;49(4):434.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Devi B, Tang T, Corbex M. Reducing by half the percentage of late-stage presentation for breast and cervix cancer over 4 years: a pilot study of clinical downstaging in Sarawak, Malaysia. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(7):1172–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mittra I, Mishra GA, Singh S, Aranke S, Notani P, Badwe R, et al. A cluster randomized, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India: methodology and interim results after three rounds of screening. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(4):976–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pisani P, Parkin DM, Ngelangel C, Esteban D, Gibson L, Munson M, et al. Outcome of screening by clinical examination of the breast in a trial in the Philippines. Int J Cancer. 2005;118(1):149–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Thara S, Muwonge R, Prabhakar J, Augustine P, et al. Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(19):1476–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Harford JB. Breast-cancer early detection in low-income and middle-income countries: do what you can versus one size fits all. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(3):306–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, Karsa von L, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. European Commission, ISBN; 2006.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Klabunde C, Bouchard F, Taplin S, Scharpantgen A, Ballard-Barbash R, International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN). Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55(3):204–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Klabunde CN, Sancho-Garnier H, Taplin S, Thoresen S, Ohuchi N, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Quality assurance in follow-up and initial treatment for screening mammography programs in 22 countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(6):449–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bennett HS, Dienstfrey A, Hudson LT, Oreskovic T, Fuerst T, Shepherd J. Standards and measurements for assessing bone health-workshop report co-sponsored by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). J Clin Densitom. 2006;9(4):399–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Groot MT, Baltussen R, Uyl-de Groot CA, Anderson BO, Hortobágyi GN. Costs and health effects of breast cancer interventions in epidemiologically different regions of Africa, North America, and Asia. Breast J. 2006;12 Suppl 1:S81–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Okonkwo QL, Draisma G, der Kinderen A, Brown ML, de Koning HJ. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(18):1290–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Denewer A, Hussein O, Farouk O, Elnahas W, Khater A, El-Saed A. Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt. World J Surg. 2010;34(9):2204–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Genant H, Cooper C, Poor G, Reid I. Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization task-force for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(4):259–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zethraeus N, Borgström F, Ström O, Kanis JA, Jönsson B. Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis—a review of the literature and a reference model. Osteoporos Int. 2006;18(1):9–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tosteson ANA, Melton LJ III, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S, et al. Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int [Internet]. 2008;19(4):437–47. http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00198-007-0550-6
  47. 47.
    Knaul F, Bustreo F, Ha E, Langer A. Breast cancer: why link early detection to reproductive health interventions in developing countries? Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51 Suppl 2:s220–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reeler A, Qiao Y, Dare L, Li J, Zhang AL, Saba J. Women’s cancers in developing countries: from research to an integrated health systems approach. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10(3):519–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kim JJ, Salomon JA, Weinstein MC, Goldie SJ. Packaging health services when resources are limited: the example of a cervical cancer screening visit. PLoS Med. 2006;3(11):e434.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shetty MK, Longatto-Filho A. Early detection of breast, cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancers in low resource countries: an integrated approach. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2011;2(3):165–71.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Anderson BO, Cazap E, El Saghir NS, Yip CH, Khaled HM, Otero IV, et al. Optimisation of breast cancer management in low-resource and middle-resource countries: executive summary of the Breast Health Global Initiative consensus, 2010. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(4):387–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lin SJ. Factors influencing the uptake of screening services for breast and cervical cancer in Taiwan. J R Soc Promot Health. 2008;128(6):327–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stein S. Barriers to breast cancer screening. 2011.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    George SA. Barriers to breast cancer screening: an integrative review. Health Care Women Int. 2000; 21(1):53–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Maheswaran R. Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(3):208–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Dinshaw K, Mishra G, Shastri S, Badwe R, Kerkar R, Ramani S, et al. Determinants of compliance in a cluster randomised controlled trial on screening of breast and cervix cancer in Mumbai, India (1. compliance to screening). Oncology. 2007;73(3–4):145–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Consedine NS, Magai C, Krivoshekova YS, Ryzewicz L, Neugut AI. Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13(4):501–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Freeman HP. Patient navigation: a community based strategy to reduce cancer disparities. J Urban Health. 2006;83(2):139–41.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Robinson-White S, Conroy B, Slavish KH, Rosenzweig M. Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs. 2010;33(2):127–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ, Garcia R, Greene A, Calhoun E, et al. Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer. 2008;113(8):1999–2010.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gupta S, Vij A, Cafiero E, Bloom D, Agarwal S, Donelan K, et al. Retail venue based screening mammography. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(10):1268–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Breen N, Gentleman JF, Schiller JS. Update on mammography trends. Cancer. 2010;117(10):2209–18.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Smigal C, Jemal A, Ward E, Cokkinides V, Smith R, Howe HL, et al. Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56(3):168–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gierisch JM, Earp JA, Brewer NT, Rimer BK. Longitudinal predictors of nonadherence to maintenance of mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(4):1103–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rahman S, Price JH, Dignan M, Rahman S, Lindquist PS, Jordan TR. Access to mammography facilities and detection of breast cancer by screening mammography: a GIS approach. Int J Canc Prev. 2009;2(6):403–13.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sohl SJ, Moyer A. Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2007;45(4):252–61.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Vyas A, Madhavan S, LeMasters T, Atkins E, Gainor S, Kennedy S, et al. Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in Appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program. J Community Health. 2012;37(3):632–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    de Vries G, van Hest RAH, Richardus JH. Impact of mobile radiographic screening on tuberculosis among drug users and homeless persons. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(2):201–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kisilevzky NH, Elkis H, Gusmao FA. A mobile interventional radiology unit: innovation and social responsibility. Einstein. 2010;8(1):75.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Reuben D, Bassett L, Hirsch S. A randomized clinical trial to assess the benefit of offering on-site mobile mammography in addition to health education for older women. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(6):1509–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Martino A. Relief within reach. ACR Bulletin 2011 Feb;12–4.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Schweitzer ME, French MT, Ullmann SG, McCoy CB. Cost-effectiveness of detecting breast cancer in lower socioeconomic status African American and Hispanic women through mobile mammography services. Med Care Res Rev. 1998;55(1):99–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    DeBruhl ND, Bassett LW, Jessop NW, Mason AM. Mobile mammography: results of a national survey. Radiology. 1996;201(2):433–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Suter LG, Elmore JG. Self-referral for screening mammography. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(10):710–3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Agarwal G, Ramakant P, Sánchez Forgach ER, Rendón JC, Chaparro JM, Basurto CS, et al. Breast cancer care in developing countries. World J Surg. 2009;33(10):2069–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Salem DS, Kamal RM, Helal MH, Hamed ST, Abdel Razek NA, Said NH, et al. Women health outreach program; a new experience for all Egyptian women. J Egypt Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;20:313–22.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Haikel RL, Mauad EC, Silva TB, Mattos JS, Chala LF, Longatto-Filho A, et al. Mammography-based screening program: preliminary results from a first 2-year round in a Brazilian region using mobile and fixed units. BMC Womens Health. 2012;12(1):32.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Orem J, Wabinga H. The roles of National Cancer Research Institutions in evolving a comprehensive cancer control program in a developing country: experience from Uganda. Oncology. 2009;77(5):272–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Badar F, Faruqui ZS, Uddin N, Trevan EA. Management of breast lesions by breast physicians in a heavily populated South Asian developing country. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(3):827–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kobeissi L, Hamra R, Samari G. The 2009 Lebanese National Mammography Campaign: results and assessment using a survey design. Epidemiology. 2012;2(1):112.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Barot S. A problem-and-solution mismatch: son preference and sex-selective abortion bans. 2012:1–5.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Sex selection & abortion: India [Internet]. www.loc.gov. [cited 2012 May 26]. p. 1–3. http://www.loc.gov/law/help/sex-selection/india.php
  83. 83.
    Ulrich U, Browning M, Gaffney EV, Schöter KH, Chesnut CH. Implementation of an osteoporosis research program with a mobile dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry unit: the Montana/Wyoming experience. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(6):583–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Greenspan S, Nace D, Perera S, Ferchak M, Fiorito G, Medich D, et al. Lessons learned from an osteoporosis clinical trial in frail long-term care residents. Clin Trials. 2012;9(2):247–56.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Greenspan SL, Perera S, Nace D, Zukowski KS, Ferchak MA, Lee CJ, et al. FRAX or fiction: determining optimal screening strategies for treatment of osteoporosis in residents in long-term care facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(4):684–90.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wahner HW, Looker A, Dunn WL, Walters LC, Hauser MF, Novak C. Quality control of bone densitometry in a national health survey (NHANES III) using three mobile examination centers. J Bone Miner Res; 2009;9(6):951–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Gounder CR, Chaisson RE. A diagonal approach to building primary healthcare systems in resource-limited settings: women-centred integration of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, MCH and NCD initiatives. Trop Med Int Health. 2012;17(12):1426–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
  89. 89.
  90. 90.
    Watts A. Awareness can check breast cancer deaths. 2012. p. 1. http://epaper.tribuneindia.com/c/489807?show=print
  91. 91.
  92. 92.
    PGI launches “Asha Jyoti.” 2012. p. 1–17. http://www.tribuneindia.com/2012/20120423/cth1.htm
  93. 93.
    Govt providing healthcare to women at their doorstep: Bansal. 2012. p. 1–3. http://www.echoofarunachal.com/?p=16080
  94. 94.
    Asha Jyoti Women’s Healthcare Outreach Mobile Programme Launched. 2012. p. 1–6. http://www.theindiapost.com/health/asha-jyoti-womens-healthcare-outreach-mobile-programme-launched
  95. 95.
    Watts A. Record turnout at medical camp. 2012. p. 1. http://epaper.tribuneindia.com/c/489806?show=print
  96. 96.
    Sohrabhi S. $12M Committed at Clinton Meet to Creating a Healthier India. 2012. http://www.indiawest.com/news/696--2m-committed-at-clinton-meet-to-creating-a-healthier-india.html
  97. 97.
    Asha Jyoti Women’s Healthcare Mobile Outreach Program—2012 CGI Annual Meeting. 2012. p. 1–2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uvpIES6_HU
  98. 98.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Everton
    • 1
  • Anna Starikovsky Nordvig
    • 2
  • Christina M. Cinelli
    • 3
  • Niranjan Khandelwal
    • 4
  1. 1.RAD-AID InternationalChevy ChaseUSA
  2. 2.RAD-AID InternationalNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of RadiodiagnosisPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations