Skip to main content

Differences in Understandings of Networked Learning Theory: Connectivity or Collaboration?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning

Abstract

In this chapter, we pursue and discuss a number of pertinent questions raised in a recently published book on networked learning practices. In this book, the editors contrast a current trend towards personalisation and individualisation of learning with a focus on mutual interdependency and collaboration amongst networked learners, and ask which directions designers of networked learning should take. Related to this, they express concerns with notions of personal learning environments, asking whether these might erode collaborative or communal patterns of interaction and the commonality of experiences amongst students. We continue these discussions by critically examining recent ideas articulated by researchers promoting the notion of “connectivism,” as this concept has strong relations to the recent popularisation of web 2.0. Terms such as “connections,” “networks,” “sharing,” “learner-centric,” “collaboration,” “participation” seem to be shared between networked learning theory and connectivism. We argue, however, that there are subtle, but fundamental differences in how these terms are understood, which might have implications for pedagogical orchestrations of networked learning. In particular, we query into different understandings and values around the “interactional interdependencies” between people, and how we should orchestrate networked learning in higher education. In doing so, we provide examples from our own practice to discuss how we might address or dissolve dichotomies, such as between individualisation and collaboration, and how ideas from networked learning and connectivism can inform each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beaty, L., Cousin, G., & Hodgson, V. (2010). Revisiting the e-quality in networked learning manifesto. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld et al., eds. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning. Networked Learning (pp. 585–592). Aalborg: Lancaster University. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/Beaty.pdf

  • Beaty, L., Hodgson, V., Mann, S., & McConnell, D. (2002). Towards e-quality in networked e-learning in higher education. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/esrc/manifesto.pdf

  • Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy. New York: Oxford University Express.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved August 5, 2010, from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm

  • Dalsgaard, C., & Paulsen, M. (2009). Transparency in cooperative online education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1492.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Laat, M. (2006). Networked learning. PhD thesis, Politie Acedemie, Apeldoorn. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://www.open.ou.nl/rslmlt/Maarten%20De%20Laat_Networked%20Learning_2006.pdf

  • Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an ­interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2002). Designing virtual learning environments based on problem ­oriented project pedagogy. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld & B. Fibiger (Eds.), Learning in virtual environments (pp. 31–54). Frederiksberg C: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Jones, C. (2009). Issues and concepts in networked learning – Analysis and the future of networked learning. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. Jones, & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional ­development. Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 259–285). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Jones, C., & Lindström, B. (Eds.). (2009). Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S. (2007). Groups vs. networks: The class struggle continues. Stephen’s web. Retrieved January 24, 2011, from http://www.downes.ca/post/42521

  • Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2007). Collectives, networks and groups in social software for e-learning. In G. Richards (Ed.), World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (pp. 2460–2467). Quebec City, QC: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreday, D. & Hodgson, V. (2008). The Tyranny of participation and collaboration in networked learning. In V. Hodgson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 640–647). Halkidiki: Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Klüwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2008). Networked learning – A social practice perspective. In V. Hodgson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 616–623). Halkidiki: Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2009). Analysing networked learning practices. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. Jones, & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 10–27). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Ferreday, D., & Hodgson, V. (2008). Networked learning a relational approach: Weak and strong ties. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmos, A., Fink, F. K., & Krogh, L. (2004). The Aalborg PBL model – Progress diversity and challenges. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103

  • Mackness, J., Sui Fai, J. M., & Willams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning. Networked Learning (pp. 266–274). Aalborg: Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D. (2002). Action research and distributed problem-based learning in continuing ­professional education. Distance Education, 23(1), 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, T., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Jones, C. (2010). Catering to the needs of the “Digital Natives” or educating the “Net Generation”? In M. J. W. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 301–318). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg, T., & Larsen, M. C. (2008). Networked identities: Understanding relationships between strong and weak ties in networked environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm.

  • Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning and knowledge today. Education.au. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://admin.edna.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2150/34771/1/gs2006_siemens.pdf.

  • Siemens, G. (2008). Collective intelligence? Nah. Connective intelligence – elearnspace. elearnspace – Learning, networks, knowledge, technology, community. Retrieved November 17, 2009, from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2008/02/18/collective-intelligence-nah-connective-intelligence/

  • Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolsby, H. (2009). Virtual environment for project based collaborative learning. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. Jones, & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. ­241–258). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolsby, H., Nyvang, T., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2002). A survey of technologies supporting virtual project based learning. In S. Banks et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on networked learning – A research based conference on e-learning in higher ­education and lifelong learning (pp. 572–580). Lancaster: Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. (2007). Virtual learning environments: Effective development and use. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and Cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice – Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenios, M. (2011). Epistemic activities and collaborative learning: Towards an analytical model for studying knowledge construction in networked learning settings. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Ryberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ryberg, T., Buus, L., Georgsen, M. (2012). Differences in Understandings of Networked Learning Theory: Connectivity or Collaboration?. In: Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., McConnell, D. (eds) Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics