Problem-Oriented Project Studies: The Role of the Teacher as Supervisor for the Study Group in Its Learning Processes



Focus is on problem-based learning in a networked learning context with focus on the use of technologies in the communicative processes among the participants. Especially, the role of the teacher in such a context is analysed. The classic, traditional role as an expert deciding the curriculum, providing lectures and seminars, giving assignments, and marking papers and essays is complemented and in some ways overruled by a new role as supervisor and facilitator for the group of students working with a research problem that they have picked themselves. However, different dimensions of this new teacher role can be observed – from expert in an academic field to a role that focuses more on processes, methodological dimensions, and the importance of a reflexive approach. In some situations, the role as social mediator is needed questioning and assisting the members of the group in the complex task of interacting with fellow students in an uncertain and volatile context and environment. Successful network learning requires teachers or supervisors who are reflective and able to take the other’s perspective.


Learning Process Learning Environment Interpersonal Communication Project Work Network Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ALA, American Library Association, Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. (1989). Final report, [online] Available at: Accessed 21 Apr 2011. Chicago: American Library Association.
  2. Alderfer, C. (1986). An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Ch. 6.Google Scholar
  3. Alrø, H., & Kristiansen, M. (2004). Dialog og magt i organisationer. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, T., & Moore, S. (Eds.). (2010). New approaches to problem-based learning: revitalizing your practice in higher education. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Breen, E., & Fallon, H. (2005). Developing student information literacy to support project and problem-based learning. In T. Barrett, I. Mac Labhrainn, & H. Fallon (Eds.), Handbook of enquiry and problem based learning (pp. 179–188). Galway: AISHE and CELT, NUI Galway. [online] Available at: Accessed 21 Apr 2011. Ch. 17.Google Scholar
  6. Braåten, S. (2000). G.H. Meads filosofi som grundlag for dialogisk forståelse. In H. Thuen & S. Vaage (Eds.), Opdragelse til det moderne – E. Durkheim, G.H. Mead, J. Dewey og P. Bourdieu (pp. 107–132). Aarhus: Klim.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Fibiger, B. (Eds.). (2002). Learning in virtual environments. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  9. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Jones, C., & Lindström, B. (Eds.). (2009).Google Scholar
  10. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., and Jones, C. (2009). Analysing networked learning practices – an introduction. L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. Jones, & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, P. N. (2008). Studenter-afstemt vejledning og kommunikation. In L. Krogh, J. B. Olsen, & P. Rasmussen (Eds.), Projektpædagogik – Perspektiver fra Aalborg Universitet (pp. 89–106). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  12. Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Dysthe, O. (Ed.). (2003). Dialog, samspil og læring. Aarhus: Klim.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1986). Theory of communicative action (Reason and the rationalization of society, Vol. 1). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Kolmos, A., Fink, F., & Krogh, L. (Eds.). (2004). The Aalborg PBL Model – progress, diversity and challenges. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning – legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mead, G. H. (1967 [1934]). Mind, self, and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Works of George Herbert Mead, Vol. 1) (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mead, G. H. (2005 [1934]). Sindet, selvet og samfundet. København: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  20. Olesen, H. S., & Jensen, J. H. (Eds.). (1999). Project studies – a late modern university reform? Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Olsen, P. B., & Pedersen, K. (Eds.). (2005). Problem-oriented project work – a workbook. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Salmon, G. (2004). E-Moderating – the key to teaching and learning online. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  23. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner – how professionals think in action. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  24. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Stewart, J., & Logan, C. (1993). Together communicating interpersonally (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Thuen, H., & Vaage, S. (Eds.). (2000). Opdragelse til det moderne – E. Durkheim, G.H. Mead, J. Dewey og P. Bourdieu. Aarhus: Klim.Google Scholar
  27. Vaage, S. (2000). Handling og pædagogik – G.H. Mead om uddannelse og socialisering. In H. Thuen & S. Vaage (Eds.), Opdragelse til det moderne – E. Durkheim, G.H. Mead, J. Dewey og P. Bourdieu (pp. 83–105). Aarhus: Klim.Google Scholar
  28. Vaage, S. (2003). Perspektivtagning, rekonstruktjon af erfaring og kreative læreprosesser: George Herbert Mead og John Dewey om læring. In O. Dysthe (Ed.), Dialog, Samspil og Læring (pp. 129–149). Aarhus: Klim.Google Scholar
  29. Webb, T., & Nielsen, J. L. (1996). Experiential pedagogy. In H. S. Olesen & P. Rasmussen (Eds.), Theoretical issues in adult education – Danish research and experiences (pp. 89–105). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Webb, T., & Nielsen, J. L. (1999). Project work at the new reform University of Roskilde – different interpretations? In H. S. Olesen & J. H. Jensen (Eds.), Project Studies – a late modern university reform? (pp. 105–120). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice – learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. In M. Cole et al. (Eds.), The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication, Business and Information TechnologiesRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations