Advertisement

Clinical Acumen, Common Sense, and Data-Based Decision Making in the Assessment of Dissimulation During Head Injury Litigation

  • Cecil R. Reynolds
  • Arthur MacNeill HortonJr.
Chapter

Abstract

Civil litigation related to personal injury over the last several decades has increased substantially, and consequently, the issue of assessment of false presentation and effort related to malingering has also increased. Base rates for malingering seen by neuropsychologists or psychologists of course vary depending on the specific sample of patients seen as the characteristics of different samples of patients seen can be very diverse.

Keywords

National Football League Mild Head Injury Forensic Setting Scholastic Aptitude Test Clinical Neuropsychologist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. V., & Bigler, E. D. (1994). Ventricular dilation as a predictor of cognitive outcome. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 106.Google Scholar
  3. Barnhart, C. L. (Ed.). (1967). The world book dictionary (Vol. 2). Chicago: Field Enterprises Educational Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, D. T. R. & Butcher, J. N. (1998). In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 209–238). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binder, L. M. (1990). Malingering following minor head trauma. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binder, L. M. (1993). Assessment of malingering after mild head injury with the Portland Digit Recognition Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 170–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binder, L. M., & Rohling, M. L. (1996). Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed-head injury. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153(1), 7–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd, A. R., McLearen, A. M., Meyer, R. G., & Denney, R. L. (2007). Detection of deception. Sarasota: Professional Resources Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cartlidge, N. E. F., & Shaw, D. A. (1981). Head injury. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Armas, A. (1996). Detection of malingering in forensic psychological evaluations. The Forensic Examiner, 5, 26–28.Google Scholar
  12. Dean, R. S., & Reynolds, C. R. (1997). Cognitive processing and self-report of lateral preference. Neuropsychology Review, 7(3), 127–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denney, R. L. (1996). Symptom validity testing of remote memory in a criminal forensic setting. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 589–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Doty, L. (1995). The smell identification test administration manual (3rd ed.). Haddon Heights: Sensonics.Google Scholar
  15. Faust, D., & Ackley, M. A. (1998). Did you think it was going to be easy? Methodological suggestions for the investigation and development of malingering detection techniques. In: C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 1–54). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Fenton, G., McClelland, R., Montgomery, A., MacFlynn, G., & Rutherford, W. (1993). The postconcussional syndrome: Social antecedents and psychological sequelae. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 493–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frederick, R. I., & Speed, F. M. (2007). On the interpretation of below-chance responding in forced-choice tests. Assessment, 14(1), 3–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greiffenstein, M. E., Baker, W., & Gola, T. (1996). Comparison of multiple scoring methods for Rey’s malingered amnesia measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 283–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Greiffenstein, M. F., Gola, T., & Baker, J. (1995). MMPI-2 validity scales versus domain specific measures in detection of factitious traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 230–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hays, W. L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  21. Hickman, J. A., & Reynolds, C. R. (1994). Effects of false allegations of sexual assault on children and families. In B. Threatt (Ed.), Evaluating children’s allegations of sexual assault. Austin: Texas Children’s Legal Resource Center.Google Scholar
  22. Iverson, G. L. (2008). Assessing for exaggeration, poor effort and malingering. In A. M. Horton Jr. & D. Wedding (Eds.), The neuropsychology handbook (3rd ed., pp. 125–182). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Jafek, B. W., Eller, P. M., Esses, B. A., & Moran, D. T. (1989). Post traumatic anosmia: Ultrastructural correlates. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 46, 300–304.Google Scholar
  24. Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  25. Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-3. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  26. Kleinmuntz, B. (1990). Why we still use our heads instead of the formulas: Toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 296–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larrabee, G. J. (Ed.). (2005). Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Larrabee, G. J. (Ed.). (2007). Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Levinson, D. M., & Reeves, D. L. (1996). Monitoring recovery from traumatic brain injury using the automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM 1.0). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 419–420.Google Scholar
  30. Malloy, P., Bihrle, A., Duffy, J., & Cimino, C. (1993). The orbitomedial frontal syndrome. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8, 185–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Matarazzo, J. (1990). Psychological assessment versus psychological testing: Validation from Binet to the school, clinic, and courtroom. American Psychologist, 45, 999–1017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKechnie, J. L. (Ed.). (1983). Webster’s new universal unabridged dictionary (2nd ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  33. McLean, A., Dikmen, S. S., & Temkin, N. (1993). Psychosocial recovery after head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 1041–1046.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory testing in psychology and physics: A methodology paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Millis, S. (1992). The Recognition Memory Test in the detection of malingered and exaggerated memory deficits. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 406–414.Google Scholar
  37. Moore, R. E. (1996). Detecting guilty knowledge in violent crimes. The Forensic Examiner, 5, 15–18.Google Scholar
  38. Pankratz, L. (1979). Symptom validity testing and symptom retraining: Procedures for the assessment and treatment of functional sensory deficits. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 409–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pankratz, L., Fausti, S. A., & Peed, S. (1975). A forced-choice technique to evaluate deafness in the hysterical or malingering patient. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 421–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parzen, E. (1960). Modern probability theory and its applications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Prigatano, G. P. (1990). Effective traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Team/patient interaction. In E. Bigler (Ed.), Traumatic brain injury (pp. 297–312). Austin: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  42. Prigatano, G. P., & Amin, K. (1993). Digit Memory Test: Unequivocal cerebral dysfunction and suspected malingering. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 537–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pritchard, D. A. (1997). Forensic neuropsychology. In M. Maruish & J. Moses (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology: Theoretical foundations for practioners (pp. 81–118). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1998). In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 163–208). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1999). The two faces of mild head injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14(2), 191–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Reynolds, C. R. (1984). Critical issues in learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 18, 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reynolds, C. R. (1987a). Intelligent testing. In C. R. Reynolds & L. Mann (Eds.), Encyclopedia of special education (pp. 855–857). New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  48. Reynolds, C. R. (1987b). Raising intelligence: Clever Hans, Candide, and the miracle in Milwaukee. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reynolds, C. R. (1997a). Measurement and statistical problems in neuropsychological assessment of children. In C. R. Reynolds & E. Fletcher-Janzen (Eds.), Handbook of clinical child neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 180–203). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  50. Reynolds, C. R. (1997b). Assessment of laterality [special issue]. Neuropsychology Review, 7(3), 105–106.Google Scholar
  51. Reynolds, C. R. (1998). Common sense, clinicians, and actuarialism in the detection of malingering during head injury litigation. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 261–286). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  52. Reynolds, C. R., & Brown, R. T. (1984). Bias in mental testing: An introduction to the issues. In C. R. Reynolds & R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 1–40). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  53. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1992). Behavior assessment system for children: Manual. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  54. Reynolds, C. R., & Livingston, R. A. (2012). Mastering modern psychological testing. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  55. Reynolds, C. R., & James, E. M. (1997). Development of neuropsychological measures. In M. Maruish & J. E. Moses (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology: Theoretical foundations for practitioners (pp. 347–370). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Roget, P. M. (1962). Roget’s international thesaurus (3rd ed.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
  57. Ruff, R. M., & Richardson, A. M. (1999). Mild traumatic brain injury. In J. J. Sweet (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology. Fundamentals and practice (pp. 313–338). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  58. Shine, A. E., Morse, L. W., & Morse, D. T. (1996). A review of the neuropsychological symptoms endorsed by individuals reporting loss of consciousness. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 448–449.Google Scholar
  59. Tukey, J. W. (1962). The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  61. Webbe, F. (2008). Sports neuropsychology. In A. M. Horton Jr. & D. Wedding (Eds.), The neuropsychology handbook (pp. 771–800). Springer: New York.Google Scholar
  62. Wesman, A. (1968). Intelligent testing. American Psychologist, 23, 267–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Youngjohn, J. R., Burrows, L., & Erdal, K. (1995). Brain damage or compensation neurosis? The controversial post-concussion syndrome. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yousem, D. M., Geckle, R. J., Bilker, W. B., McKeown, D., & Doty, R. C. (1996). Post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction: MR evaluation. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 17(6), 1171–1179.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecil R. Reynolds
    • 1
  • Arthur MacNeill HortonJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Psych Associates of MarylandBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations