Advertisement

Organizational Change – Technology Transfer Processes: A Review of the Literature

  • Faye S. Taxman
  • Steven Belenko
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Evidence-Based Crime Policy book series (SSEBCP)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, researchers from various disciplines have developed models for examining how to best import innovations in organizations. Such technology transfer (TT) models provide a conceptual framework for identifying and measuring the key components of the innovation diffusion process. In this chapter, the emphasis is on studies that have assessed the models and/or factors that affect the success of TT models in criminal justice and substance abuse treatment agencies as well as other human and social service agencies. Each model emphasizes slightly different components, but together they represent pathways for organizations to contemplate. Lessons from these conceptual frameworks are the building blocks for a new conceptual model that will expedite and facilitate the transfer of evidence to practice in dynamic settings that are characterized by multilayered processes involving an organization and the systems in which they thrive.

Keywords

Technology Transfer Substance Abuse Treatment Emotional Exhaustion Addiction Treatment Drug Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aarons, G. A. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6(2), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aarons, G. A. (2005). Measuring provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice: Consideration of organizational context and individual differences. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14(2), 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aarons, G. A. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership: Association with attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 57(8), 1162–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aarons, G. A., Fettes, D. L., Flores, L. E., Jr., & Sommerfeld, D. H. (2009). Evidence-based practice implementation and staff emotional exhaustion in children’s services. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(11), 954–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aarons, G. A., & Sawitzky, A. C. (2006). Organizational culture and climate and mental health provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychological Services, 3(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aarons, G. A., Sommerfeld, D. H., Hecht, D. B., Silovsky, J. F., & Chaffin, M. J. (2009). The impact of evidence-based practice implementation and fidelity monitoring on staff turnover: Evidence for a protective effect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(2), 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aarons, G. A., Wells, R. S., Zagursky, K., Fettes, D. L., & Palinkas, L. A. (2009). Implementing evidence-based practice in community mental health agencies: A multiple stakeholder analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 99(11), 2087–2095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Abraham, A. J., Knudsen, H. K., Rothrauff, T. C., & Roman, P. M. (2010). The adoption of alcohol pharmacotherapies in the Clinical Trials Network: The influence of research network participation. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38(3), 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC). (2004). The change book (2nd ed.). Kansas City: ATTC National Office.Google Scholar
  10. Andrzejewski, M. E., Kirby, K. C., Morral, A. R., & Iguchi, M. Y. (2001). Technology transfer through performance management: The effects of graphical feedback and positive reinforcement on drug treatment counselors’ behavior. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 63(2), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arfken, C. L., Agius, E., Dickson, M. W., Anderson, H. L., & Hegedus, H. L. (2005). Clinicians’ beliefs and awareness of substance abuse treatments in research and non-research affiliated programs. Journal of Drug Issues, 35, 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ash, J. (1997). Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers. Journal of the American Informatics Association, 4, 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Backer, T. E. (1993). Information alchemy: Transforming information through knowledge utilization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44, 217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baer, J. S., Ball, S. A., Campbell, B. K., Miele, G. M., Schoener, E. P., & Tracy, K. (2007). Training and fidelity monitoring of behavioral interventions in multi-site addictions research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 87(2–3), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baily, M. A., Bottrell, M., Lynn, J., Jennings, B., & Hastings, C. (2006). The ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety. Hastings Center Report, 36, S1–S40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bartholomew, N. G., Joe, G. W., Rowan-Szal, G. A., & Simpson, D. D. (2007). Counselor assessments of training and adoption barriers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(2), 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bero, L. A., Grilli, R., Grimshaw, J. M., Harvey, E., Oxman, A. D., & Thomson, M. A. (1998). Closing the gap between research and practice: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. British Medical Journal, 317, 465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bourgon, G., & Armstrong, B. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bride, B. E., Abraham, A. J., & Roman, P. M. (2011). Organizational factors associated with the use of contingency management in publicly funded substance abuse treatment centers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 40(1), 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown, B. S., & Flynn, P. M. (2002). The federal role in drug abuse technology transfer: A history and perspective. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 263–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coiera, E. (2003). Disseminating and applying protocols. In E. Coiera (Ed.), Guide to health informatics (2nd ed., pp. 171–179). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  23. D’Aunno, T. (2006). The role of organization and management in substance abuse treatment: Review and roadmap. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Damschroder, L., Aron, D., Keith, R., Kirsh, S., Alexander, J., & Lowery, J. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dansereau, D. F., Dees, S. M., Greener, J. M., & Simpson, D. D. (1995). Node-link mapping and the evaluation of drug abuse counseling sessions. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9(3), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ducharme, L. J., Knudsen, H. K., Roman, P. M., & Johnson, J. A. (2007). Innovation adoption in substance abuse treatment: Exposure, trialability, and the Clinical Trials Network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(4), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eliason, M. (2003). Evidence based practices: An implementation guide for community based substance abuse treatment agencies. Iowa City: The Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation.Google Scholar
  28. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).Google Scholar
  29. Fletcher, B. W., Lehman, W. E., Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Taxman, F. S., & Young, D. W. (2009). Measuring collaboration and integration activities in criminal justice and substance abuse treatment agencies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103(Suppl 1), S54–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedmann, P. D., Taxman, F. S., & Henderson, C. E. (2007). Evidence-based treatment practices for drug-involved adults in the criminal justice system. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fuller, B. E., Rieckmann, T., Nunes, E. V., Miller, M., Arfken, C., Edmundson, E., et al. (2007). Organizational readiness for change and opinions toward treatment innovations. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(2), 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garner, B. R. (2009). Research on the diffusion of evidence-based treatments within substance abuse treatment: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(4), 376–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Green, L. W., Orleans, C. T., Ottoson, J. M., Cameron, R., Pierce, J. P., & Bettinghaus, E. P. (2006). Inferring strategies for disseminating physical activity policies, programs, and practices from the successes of tobacco control. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(4 Suppl 1), 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grella, C. E., Greenwell, L., Prendergast, M., Farabee, D., Hall, E., Cartier, J., et al. (2007). Organizational characteristics of drug abuse treatment program for offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Griffiths, P., & Riddington, L. (2001). Nurses’ use of computer databases to identify evidence for practice – a cross-sectional questionnaire survey in a UK hospital. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 18, 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grimshaw, J. M., Thomas, R. E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C. R., Vale, L., et al. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment, 8(6), 1–72.Google Scholar
  38. Grol, R. (2001). Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Medical Care, 39(8 Suppl 2), II46–II54.Google Scholar
  39. Henderson, C. E., Taxman, F. S., & Young, D. W. (2008). A Rasch model analysis of evidence-based treatment practices used in the criminal justice system. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 93(1–2), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of change: Identifying, understanding, and supporting champions of technological innovations. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Institute of Medicine. (1992). Guidelines for clinical practice: From development to use. Washington: Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
  42. Institute of Medicine. (2002). The future of public health in the 21st century. Washington: Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
  43. Institute of Medicine. (2006). Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance use conditions. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  44. Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  45. Kaplan, B. (1997). Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. Journal of the American Informatics Association, 4, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaplan, H. C., Brady, P. W., Dritz, M. C., Hooper, D. K., Linam, W. M., Froehle, C. M., et al. (2010). The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: A systematic review of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly, 88(4), 500–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kauth, M., Sullivan, G., Blevins, D., Cully, J., Landes, R., Said, Q., et al. (2010). Employing external facilitation to implement cognitive behavioral therapy in VA clinics: A pilot study. Implementation Science, 5(1), 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kilbourne, A. M., Neumann, M. S., Pincus, H. A., Bauer, M. S., & Stall, R. (2007). Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: Application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implementation Science, 2(1), 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 811–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1055–1080.Google Scholar
  51. Knudsen, H. K., Abraham, A. J., Johnson, J. A., & Roman, P. M. (2009). Buprenorphine adoption in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 37(3), 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Knudsen, H. K., Ducharme, L. J., & Roman, P. M. (2006). Early adoption of buprenorphine in substance abuse treatment centers: Data from the private and public sectors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30(4), 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Knudsen, H. K., Ducharme, L. J., & Roman, P. M. (2007). Research participation and turnover intention: An exploratory analysis of substance abuse counselors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(2), 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Knudsen, H. K., Ducharme, L. J., Roman, P. M., & Link, T. (2005). Buprenorphine diffusion: The attitudes of substance abuse treatment counselors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 29(2), 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Knudsen, H. K., & Roman, P. M. (2002). Modeling the use of innovations in private treatment organizations: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26, 353–361.Google Scholar
  56. Knudsen, H. K., & Roman, P. M. (2004). Modeling the use of innovations in private treatment organizations: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26(1), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Latessa, E. J., Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2002). Beyond corrections quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 3, 43–49.Google Scholar
  58. Lehman, W. E., Greener, J. M., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Assessing organizational readiness for change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Liddle, H. A., Rowe, C. L., Gonzalez, A., Henderson, C. E., Dakof, G. A., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2006). Changing provider practices, program environment, and improving outcomes by transporting multidimensional family therapy to adolescent drug treatment setting. The American Journal on Addictions, 15, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Liddle, H. A., Rowe, C. L., Quille, T. J., Dakof, G. A., Mills, D. S., Sakran, E., et al. (2002). Transporting a research-based adolescent drug treatment into practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lipsey, M. W., & Landenberger, N. A. (2006). Cognitive – behavioral interventions. In B. C. Welsh & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works for children, offender, victims, and places. Great Britain: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26, 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McCarty, D., Fuller, B. E., Arfken, C., Miller, M., Nunes, E. V., Edmundson, E., et al. (2007). Direct care workers in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network: Characteristics, opinions, and beliefs. Psychiatric Services, 58(2), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McKay, J. R. (2006). Continuing care in the treatment of addictive disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 8(5), 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McLellan, A. T., Carise, D., & Kleber, H. D. (2003). Can the national addiction treatment infrastructure support the public’s demand for quality care? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25(2), 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McLellan, A. T., Kemp, J., Brooks, A., & Carise, D. (2008). Improving public addiction treatment through performance contracting: The Delaware experiment. Health Policy, 87(3), 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mee-Lee, D., Shulman, G., Fishman, M., Gastfriend, D. R., & Griffith, J. H. (Eds.). (2001). ASAM patient placement criteria for the treatment of substance-related disorders, Second ed.-revised (ASAM PPC-2R). Chevy Chase: American Society of Addiction Medicine.Google Scholar
  68. Miller, W. R., & Mount, K. A. (2001). A small study of training in motivational interviewing: Does one workshop change clinician and client behavior? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29(04), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Miller, W. R., Sorensen, J. L., Selzer, J. A., & Brigham, G. S. (2006). Disseminating evidence-based practices in substance abuse treatment: A review with suggestions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Morrison, D. (2004). Real-world use of evidence-based treatments in community behavioral health care. Psychiatric Services, 55, 485–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Oser, C. B., Staton Tindall, M., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2006). HIV testing in corrections agencies and community treatment programs: The impact of internal organizational structure. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Øvretveit, J. (2003). What are the best strategies for ensuring quality in hospitals? Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe’s Health Evidence Network.Google Scholar
  73. Panzano, P. C., & Roth, D. (2006). The decision to adopt evidence-based and other innovative mental health practices: Risky business? Psychiatric Services, 57(8), 1153–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  75. Roman, P. M., Abraham, A. J., Rothrauff, T. C., & Knudsen, H. K. (2010). A longitudinal study of organizational formation, innovation adoption, and dissemination activities within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38(Suppl 1), S44–S52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roman, P. M., Ducharme, L. J., & Knudsen, H. K. (2006). Patterns of organization and management in private and public substance abuse treatment programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31(3), 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roman, P. M., & Johnson, J. A. (2002). Adoption and implementation of new technologies in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Saldana, L., Chapman, J. E., Henggeler, S. W., & Rowland, M. D. (2007). The organizational readiness for change scale in adolescent programs: Criterion validity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schoenwald, K. S., & Hoagwood, K. (2001). Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of interventions: What matters when? Psychiatric Services, 52, 1190–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Simpson, D. D. (2002). A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Simpson, D. D., & Flynn, P. M. (2007). Moving innovations into treatment: A stage-based approach to program change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(2), 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., & Brown, B. S. (1997). Length of stay in treatment and follow-up outcomes in DATOS. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 294–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taxman, F. S. (2006). Assessment with a flair. Federal Probation, 70(2), 3–15.Google Scholar
  84. Taxman, F. S. (2008). No illusion, offender and organizational change in Maryland’s proactive community supervision model. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(2), 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Taxman, F. S., & Bouffard, J. A. (2000). The importance of systems issues in improving offender outcomes: Critical elements of treatment integrity. Justice Research and Policy, 2, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Taxman, F. S., & Bouffard, J. (2002). Treatment inside the drug treatment court: The who, what, where, and how of treatment services. Substance Use and Misuse, 37(12/13), 1665–1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Taxman, F. S., & Gordon, J. (2009). Do fairness and equity matter? An examination of organizational justice among correctional officers in adult prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Taxman, F. S., Henderson, C., Young, D. W., & Farrell, J. (2010). The importance of juvenile justice offices’ social climates in supporting the use of research-supported assessment and case planning practices. Baltimore, MD: JMATE Conference.Google Scholar
  89. Taxman, F. S., Perdoni, M., & Harrison, L. D. (2007). Drug treatment services for adult offenders: The state of the state. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Taxman, F. S., Shepardson, E., & Byrne, J. (2004). Tools of the trade: A guide for incorporating science into practice. Prepared for the Community Corrections Division, National Institute of Corrections, Washington.Google Scholar
  91. Taxman, F. S., & Sherman, S. (1998). What is the status of my client? Automation in a seamless case management system for substance abusing offenders. The Journal of Offender Monitoring, 11(4), 25–27.Google Scholar
  92. Tucker, J. A., & Roth, D. L. (2006). Extending the evidence hierarchy to enhance evidence-based practice for substance use disorders. Addiction, 101(7), 918–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Van Voorhis, P., Spruance, L., Johnson Listwan, S., Ritchie, N., & Seabrook, R. (2004). Results of the Georgia cognitive skills experiment: A replication of reasoning and rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 282–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Walters, S. T., Matson, S. A., Baer, J. S., & Ziedonis, D. M. (2005). Effectiveness of workshop training for psychosocial addiction treatments: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 29(4), 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009). Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: A thematic analysis of the literature. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 14(3), 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Weiner, B. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(1), 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wexler, H. K., Burdon, W. M., & Prendergast, M. L. (2005). Maximum-security prison therapeutic community and aftercare: First outcomes. Offender Substance Abuse Report, 5, 81–96.Google Scholar
  99. Wilson, P., Petticrew, M., Calnan, M., & Nazareth, I. (2010). Disseminating research findings: What should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks. Implementation Science, 5(1), 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Young, D. (2002). Impacts of perceived legal pressure on retention in drug treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(1), 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Young, D., & Belenko, S. (2002). Program retention and perceived coercion in three models of mandatory drug treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 32(1), 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Young, D. W., Dembo, R., & Henderson, C. E. (2007). A national survey of substance abuse treatment for juvenile offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(3), 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Young, D. W., Farrell, J. L., Henderson, C. E., & Taxman, F. S. (2009). Filling service gaps: Providing intensive treatment services for offenders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103(Suppl 1), S33–S42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Criminology, Law and SocietyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminal JusticeTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations