Skip to main content

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Relatives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Statistics for Bioengineering Sciences

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Statistics ((STS))

Abstract

This chapter introduces several notions fundamental for disease or device testing. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of a test are measures of the performance of a diagnostic test and are intimately connected with probability calculations (estimations) and Bayes’ rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Chapter References

  • Cabrera-Abreu, J., Davies, P., Matek, Z., and Murphy, M. (2004). Performance of blood tests in diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in a specialist clinic. Arch. Dis. Child., 89, 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casscells, W., Schoenberger, A., and Grayboys, T. (1978). Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. New Engl. J. Med., 299, 999–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Don, M., Kwong, B., Tanaka, C., Brackmann, D., and Nelson, R. (2005). The stacked ABR: A sensitive and specific screening tool for detecting small acoustic tumors. Audiol. Neurotol., 10, 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drum, D. E. and Christacopoulos, S. (1972). Hepatic seintigraphy in clinical decision making. J. Nucl. Med., 13, 908–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. A. (1990). Estimated prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease in the United States. Milbank Q., 68, 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, S. Z., Simons, G. R., Elliott, C. G., Haire, W. D., Toltzis, R., Blacklow, S. C., Doolittle M. H., and Weinberg, D. S. (1993). Quantitative plasma D-dimer levels among patients undergoing pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 270, 23, 819–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B. J. and Mushlin, A. I. (1987). Use of a single thyroxine test to evaluate ambulatory medical patients for suspected hypothyroidism. J. Gen. Intern. Med., 2, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. M., Garrett, J. A., and Stephenson, B. (2001). Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard. Stat. Med., 20, 1987–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, S. N., Repoli, A. F., Semenuk, M., Harris, P. J., Ghanbari, H. A., Lebowitz, M. S. (2008). HAAH identifies prostate cancer, regardless of PSA level. Presentation at 2008 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavromatis, B. H. and Kessler, C. M. (2001). D-Dimer testing: the role of the clinical laboratory in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. J. Clin. Pathol., 54, 664–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, R., Mathai, A., Parikh, S., Sekhar, G. C., Thomas, R. (2008). Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J. Ophthalmol., 56, 1, 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Y. and Hadgu, A. (1998). A model for evaluating sensitivity and specificity for correlated diagnostic tests in efficacy studies with an imperfect reference test. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 93, 920–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radack, K. L., Rouan, G., Hedges, J. (1986). The likelihood ratio: An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 110, 689–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, H., Kwok, C.-S., Rosendahl, S. M., Bandilla, D., Maes, O., Melmed, C., Rabinovitch, D., Burns, D. H. (2008). Spectroscopy of human plasma for diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Biomark. Med., 2, 3, 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staquet, M., Rozencweig, M., Lee, Y.J., Muggia, F.M. (1981). Methodology for assessment of new dichotomous diagnostic tests. J. Chronic. Dis., 34, 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brani Vidakovic .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vidakovic, B. (2011). Sensitivity, Specificity, and Relatives. In: Statistics for Bioengineering Sciences. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0394-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics