Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery

  • Paul D. Mongan
  • Vikas V. Patel


Posterior cervical stabilization and fusion with or without decompression is a commonly performed procedure for fracture and/or dislocation of the cervical spine, to stop the progression of spinal deformity, or to decompress the spinal cord and/or nerve roots (tumors, infections, deformity, and stenosis). While fracture repair and nerve root decompressions are usually limited to one or two levels, decompression of the spinal canal for tumors, infections and cervical spinal stenosis can be multilevel procedures (Fig. 29.1)


Posterior cervical fusion Posterior Cervical Fusion Cervical pedicle Lateral mass screw indications Decompression 


  1. 1.
    Harrop JS, Naroji S, Maltenfort M, Anderson DG, Albert T, Ratliff JK, Ponnappan RK, Rihn JA, Smith HE, Hilibrand A, Sharan AD, Vaccaro A. Cervical myelopathy: a clinical and radiographic evaluation and correlation to cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Volume 35(6), 15 March 2010, pp 620–624.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mummaneni PV, Kaiser MG, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff M, Heary R, et al. Preoperative patient selection with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and electroencephalography: does the test predict outcome after cervical surgery? J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11:119–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mummaneni PV, Kaiser MG, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Heary RF, et al. Cervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11:130–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson PA, Matz PG, Groff MW, Heary RF, Holly LT, Kaiser MG, et al. Laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11:150–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Houten JK, Cooper PR. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:1081–7; discussion 1087–8.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhou F, Zou J, Gan M, Zhu R, Yang H. Management of fracture-dislocation of the lower cervical spine with the cervical pedicle screw system. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:406–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rhee JM, Kraiwattanapong C, Hutton WC. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:E636–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kothe R, Ruther W, Schneider E, Linke B. Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:1869–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Horie Y, Hida T, Nakashima H, et al. Placement and complications of cervical pedicle screws in 144 cervical trauma patients using pedicle axis view techniques by fluoroscope. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1293–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee GY, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR. Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement: a comparison of the “open” lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:25–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kast E, Mohr K, Richter HP, Borm W. Complications of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:327–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richter M, Mattes T, Cakir B. Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:50–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA, Vaccaro AR, Foley KF, Albert TJ. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:1655–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abumi K, Shono Y, Ito M, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Kaneda K. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:962–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tracy JA, Bartleson JD. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist. 2010;16:176–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klineberg E. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of the evidence. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41:193–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bapat MR, Chaudhary K, Sharma A, Laheri V. Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1651–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shin JJ, Jin BH, Kim KS, Cho YE, Cho WH. Intramedullary high signal intensity and neurological status as prognostic factors in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152:1687–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Avadhani A, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP. Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J. 2010;10:475–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petraglia AL, Srinivasan V, Coriddi M, Whitbeck MG, Maxwell JT, Silberstein HJ. Cervical laminoplasty as a management option for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a series of 40 patients. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:272–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hale JJ, Gruson KI, Spivak JM. Laminoplasty: a review of its role in compressive cervical myelopathy. Spine J. 2006;6:289S–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Djurasovic M, Dimar 2nd JR, Glassman SD, Edmonds HL, Carreon LY. A prospective analysis of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of posterior cervical screw fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:515–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grande CM, Barton CR, Stene JK. Appropriate techniques for airway management of emergency patients with suspected spinal cord injury. Anesth Analg. 1988;67:714–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Santoni BG, Hindman BJ, Puttlitz CM, Weeks JB, Johnson N, Maktabi MA, et al. Manual in-line stabilization increases pressures applied by the laryngoscope blade during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:24–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thiboutot F, Nicole PC, Trepanier CA, Turgeon AF, Lessard MR. Effect of manual in-line stabilization of the cervical spine in adults on the rate of difficult orotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:412–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ford P, Nolan J. Cervical spine injury and airway management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002;15:193–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crosby ET. Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:1293–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fuchs G, Schwarz G, Baumgartner A, Kaltenbock F, Voit-Augustin H, Planinz W. Fiberoptic intubation in 327 neurosurgical patients with lesions of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1999;11:11–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Heary RF, Holly LT, Kaiser MG, et al. Cervical laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;11:157–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of Colorado HospitalAuroraUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of ColoradoDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations