Skip to main content

Abstract

Human history has often been described as a progressive relinquishment from environmental constraints. Now, it seems, we have come full circle. The ecological irrationalities associated with industrial societies have a lengthy history, and our purpose is not to catalogue this litany of horrors. Collectively, however, we have crossed certain literal and figurative thresholds. Our ability to commit such acts of irrationality unconsciously, obliviously, or simply nonchalantly is no longer a luxury we enjoy. Two intersecting moments define this historic nexus. The mounting evidence for global climate change, now unequivocally attributed to socio-economic activities, has accumulated to the extent that today even insistent deniers must concede defeat in any but the most closeted of social circles. Simultaneously, as fossil fuel seekers come home with ever-shrinking finds, the end of easy oil and the easy wealth it has generated is upon us, rendering non-conventional fossil fuels the next most attractive option to those states and corporations that control the extraction and delivery of energy resources. The development of such non-conventional fuels does nothing to alleviate either climate change or peak oil, however. On the contrary, the tremendous energy requirements for extraction and processing of these low quality fuels translate into an abysmal and ever-decreasing return on energy investments, escalating greenhouse gas emissions, and other environmental disruptions. These two facts – growing reliance on non-conventional fuels and increasing scale of environmental disruption – are not merely co-incidental: as “easy” global reserves of fossil fuels in general, and oil in particular, become depleted, the remaining fossil fuels are far more difficult to source, and hence environmentally, socially, and economically more costly to extract (Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy, 2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To recover one barrel of bitumen by in situ extraction, 1,000 cubic feet of natural gas is required, and 250 cubic feet of natural gas is needed for extraction by open-pit mining (Alberta Chamber of Resources 2004). These figures do not include the energy consumed in the upgrading, refining and transport of fuels.

  2. 2.

    What that number is poses a frustrating source of elusion for empirical researchers, but conceptually it is determined by the level of accumulated behavioural change that is needed to overwhelm the absorption capacity of the existing social system.

  3. 3.

    Reported at: http://www.tarsandswatch.org/overwhelming-majority-albertans-support-pause-new-oil-sands-approvals. Accessed Dec 29 2010.

References

  • Alberta Chamber of Resources (2004). Oil Sands Technology Roadmap: Unlocking the Potential. http://www.acr-alberta.com/Portals/0/projects/OSTR_report.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2011.

  • Alberta Environment (2009a). Alberta’s Oil Sands and Greenhouse Gases (GHG). http://www.environment.alberta.ca/2588.html. Accessed 15 January 2011.

  • Alberta Environment (2009b). Reclaiming Alberta’s Oil Sands. http://www.environment.alberta.ca/2596.html. Accessed 15 January 2011.

  • Alberta Environment (2009c). Frequently Asked Questions – Oil Sands. http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/faqs/faq5-oil_sands.asp. Accessed 15 January 2011.

  • Alberta Environment (2009d). Tailings. http://www.environment.alberta.ca/2595.html. Accessed 15 January 2011.

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2009). World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentivegna, S. (2006). Rethinking politics in the world of ICTs. European Journal of Communication 21(3), 331–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, L.A., Hinnant, C.C., & Wong, W. (1998). Market-based reforms in government: toward a social subcontract? Administration and Society, 30(5), 483–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, S.G. (1985). Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange and the Failure of the Modern State. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M., Blum, J., George, S., Gille, Z. et al. (2000). Global Ethnography: Force, Connections and Imaginations in a Postmodern World. Los Angeles: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, S.G., & Ciccantell, P.S. (2005). Globalization and the Race for Resources. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP). (2009). Crude oil: forecasts, markets, and pipeline expansions. http://www.capp.ca/GetDoc.aspx?DocId=152951. Accessed 22 Feb 2010.

  • Chastko, P. (2004). Developing Alberta’s Oil Sands: From Karl Clark to Kyoto. Calgary: University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccantell, P.S. (2005). Globalization and the Race for Resources. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccantell, P., Smith, D.A. (2009). Rethinking global commodity chains: integrating extraction, transport, and manufacturing. International Journal Comparative Sociology, 50(3–4), 361–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R.B. (2009). Existing and proposed canadian commercial oil sands projects. StrategyWest Inc. http://www.strategywest.com/downloads/StratWest_OSProjects.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2011.

  • Finlayson, A. (1994). Fishing for Truth: A Sociological analysis of northern cod stock assessments from 1977 to 1990. St John’s, NL: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, D.J., Hironaka, A., & Schofer, E. (2000). The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. American Sociological Review 65 (February), 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W.R. & Alario, M. (2007). Weapons of mass distraction: magicianship, misdirection, and the dark side of legitimation. Sociological Forum 22(2),146–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, W.R., Gramling, R., & Davidson, D.J. (2008). Scientific uncertainty argumentation methods (SCAMs): science and the politics of doubt. Sociological Inquiry 78(1), 2–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. & Korzeniewicz, M. (Eds.). (1994). Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillmor, D. (2005). Shifting sands. The Walrus 2(3), 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Ypsilanti: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M.A. & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmentalpolitics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7(3), 175–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, M.T. (2008). From lifeblood to addiction: oil, space, and the wage-relation in petro-capitalist USA. Human Geography 1(2), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, H. (1956). The Fur Trade in Canada: An Introduction to Canadian Economic History. Toronto: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innis, H. (1940). The Cod Fisheries: The History of an International Economy. Toronto: Ryerson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, M. (2008). Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy. New York: Henry Holt & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, B. (2001). The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maich, S. (2005, June 13). Alberta is about to get wildly rich and powerful. What does that mean for Canada? Macleans. Available at: http://www.macleans.ca/article.jsp?content=20050613_107308_107308. Accessed 15 January 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, R.L., & Schlenker, R. (2006, December). Energy and the Alberta Economy: Past and Future Impacts and Implications. Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy. University of Calgary. Available at: http://www.ucalgary.ca/files/iseee/ABEnergyFutures-01.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2011.

  • Massey, D.B. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.B. (1995). Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.B. (1994). Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A.P.J., & Sonnenfeld, D.A. (Eds.). (2000). Ecological Modernization Around the World: Perspectives and Critical Debates.London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikiforuk, A. (2008). Tar Sands: Dirty Oil and the Future of a Continent. Vancouver: Greystone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J., & Myers, J.J. (2002). The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t go it Alone. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Princen, T., Maniates, M.F., & Conca, K. (2002). Confronting Consumption. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (1994). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. London: Harper-Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, T. (2005). Oil: Politics, Poverty and the Planet. Halifax: Fernwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., & Warde, A. (1998). Inconspicuous Consumption: the Sociology of Consumption and the Environment. Lancaster UK: Department of Sociology, Lancaster University. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/shove-warde-inconspicuous-consumption.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2011.

  • Simon, J. (1981). The Ultimate Resource. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G. & Mol, A.P.J. (1992). Sociology, the environment and modernity: ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society and Natural Resources 5:323–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra J. Davidson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidson, D.J., Gismondi, M. (2011). Look Who’s Talking. In: Challenging Legitimacy at the Precipice of Energy Calamity. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0287-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics