Privacy in the Family

Chapter

Abstract

With the great technological advances of the modern era, people have increased concerns about privacy. This chapter, based on data collected from in-depth interviews with 12 respondents from Mainland China, analyzes Chinese people’s privacy orientation, consciousness of rights of privacy, and demarcation of privacy boundaries The mainland Chinese prioritize the privacy of solitude, intimacy, and reserve, while anonymity is not highly prized. In respect of privacy, the mainland Chinese give their family a certain degree of tolerance for opening personal letters. They take the individual as the boundary of privacy, whereby they attend seriously to the personal room as privacy space. Nevertheless, the individuals give their family a high degree of openness in respect to other rights such as knowledge about personal finances and companions, whereby the family as a unit can remain as another boundary of privacy. In the aspects of studies, friendship, work, and emotional relationships, the individuals would disclose to their family the status quo of a personal relationship, but not the problems encountered. Instead, the individual would discuss with schoolmates, friends, or lovers while encountering unhappiness. The individual’s zone of privacy thus also involves non-family members such as friends. Although the function of the family in providing emotional support and satisfaction is no longer as important as before, Chinese people continue to attach much importance to familial relationships.

Keywords

Permeability Transportation Burial Concession 

References

  1. Altman, I. (1976). Privacy: A conceptual analysis. Environment and Behavior, 8(1), 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chan, Ying-keung. (1999). Reserve and intimacy: Privacy states extending across the family boundary. Indicators of social development (pp. 133–157). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Chan, Ying-keung. (2000). Privacy in the family: Its hierarchical and asymmetric nature. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31, 1–17.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, Ying-keung. (2001). Privacy in Hong Kong: Concept and empirical analysis. Hong Kong Social Science Journal, 2, 67–84.Google Scholar
  5. Fei, Xiaotong (1992). Pattern of differential order. In Fei Xiaotong’s self-selected academic works (pp. 357–365). Beijing: Beijing Normal University.Google Scholar
  6. Hu, Chenghui (2000) Modernization: Process, characteristic and response. Zhejiang People’s Publishing House, 8–11.Google Scholar
  7. Li, Hongchun. (2002). The development of contemporary Chinese private territory and the rise of mass culture. Tianjin Social Science, 3, 108–113.Google Scholar
  8. Lin, Lin (2001). Network era and privacy. Asian Studies (Special Issue on Media Ethics in Information Era), 6, 58–65.Google Scholar
  9. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Traver, H. (1984) Orientations towards privacy in Hong Kong. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59:635–644.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ResearcherHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations