Turning from Laggard to Leader in National Radical Innovation and Beyond

The Case of Mannesmann’s Predevelopment Unit and the Project Robin for Germany’s Electronic GPS-Based Truck Toll System
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

This chapter describes and analyzes the case of the rise of a late entrant in the area of electronic road tolling systems – Mannesmann AG – from a laggard nation – Germany – in the traditional market of road tolling equipment which was dominated by a number of established incumbents with conventional technology. By faster anticipating and combining previously unrelated trends in the technological, institutional, and market domains plus transforming them into a new radical approach, the newcomer company managed to introduce the core of the new high-tech system for electronic road tolling in Germany – the so called “On-Board-Unit.” This case was reconstructed with hindsight using a large amount of internal and public documents combined with several interviews with key persons in charge of the project. The analyzed innovation project was called ROBIN (Road Billing Network) and was initiated by the innovation unit of the German Mannesmann AG called “Mannesmann Pilotentwicklung” in 1992 and was introduced in the market in 2005. It combined the upcoming traffic telematics with new communication and location technologies. Important application fields were identified in the area of electronic road pricing, navigation, and traffic management. Using a multilevel and multistages framework based on literature from NPD as well as the strategy/innovation literature, this case provides interesting propositions on how various challenges regarding multiple uncertainties in the institutional and firm context as well as multiple newness dimensions in technology and applications can be managed over a time period of over 8–10 years, including a hostile take-over of the firm by Vodafone. Of specific interest in this context is the role of the innovation unit “Mannesmann Pilotentwicklung” and their strategies to help this project to finally succeed.

Keywords

Innovation Process Radical Innovation Innovation Project Road Toll Electronic Toll Collection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abernathy, W. J. and Utterback, J. M. (1978): Patterns of Industrial Innovation, in: Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. (Eds, Burgelman, R. A., Maidique, M. A. and Wheelwright, S. C.), Irwin, Chicago u.a.O., 154–160.Google Scholar
  2. Barney, J. (1991): Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bower, J. (1970): Managing the Resource Allocation Process, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burgelman, R.A. and Sayles, L.R. (1986): Inside Corporate Innovation, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chesbrough, H. (2003): Environmental influences upon firm entry into new sub-markets: Evidence from the worldwide hard-disk-drive industry conditionally. Research Policy 32(4):403–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1993): Major New Products: What Distinguishes the Winners in the Chemical Industry? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 2, 90–111.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, C.M. (1997): The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston, MA: HBS Press.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, C.M. and Raynor, M.E. (2003): The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth, Boston, MA: HBS Press.Google Scholar
  9. Daneels, E. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (2001): Product innovativeness from the firm’s perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foster, R. (1986): Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage, New York, Summit Books.Google Scholar
  11. Gatignon, H., Tushman, M.L., Smith, W. and Anderson, P. (2002): A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics, Management Science, 48, 1103–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garcia, R. and Calantone, R. (2002): A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert; C. G. (2005) Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource versus Routine Rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 5, pp. 741 – 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hauschildt, J. (2004): Innovations management, Munich: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  15. Hauschildt, J. and Salomo, S. (2005): Je innovativer, desto erfolgreicher? Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 55, 1, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hüsig, S. (2006): Institutionalisierte Vorentwicklung für radikale Innovationen – Dargestellt am Beispiel der Mannesmann Pilotentwicklung und der LKW-Mauttechnik, Duisburg, Germany: WiKu-Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Hüsig, S., Hipp, C. and Dowling, M. (2005): Analysing Disruptive Potential: The case of wireless local area network and the mobile telecommunications network companies, R&D Management, 35, 1, 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kai, M. (2006): The 11th Five-Year Plan: targets, paths and policy orientation, National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), People’s Republic of China, http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/t20060323_63813.htm (09.05.10).
  19. Leifer, R., McDermott, C.M., O’Connor, G.C., Peters, L.S., Rice, M.P. and Veryzer, R.W. (2000): Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies can Outsmart Upstarts, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  20. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992): Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development, Strategic Management Journal, 13, Summer Special Issue,111–125.Google Scholar
  21. Lynn, G.S., Morone, J.G. and Paulson, A.S. (1996): Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe and learn process. In Tushman, M.L. and Anderson, P. (eds), Managing Strategic Innovation and Change – A Collection of Readings, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 353–375.Google Scholar
  22. Mensch, G. (1975): Das technologische Patt: Innovationen überwinden die Depression. Umschau Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  23. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.) (1993): National Innovation Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford u.a.O.Google Scholar
  24. Porter, M.E. (1980): Competitive Strategy. Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Porter, M.E. (1985): Competitive Advantage, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Porter, M.E. (1991): Towards a dynamic theory of strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 12, Special Issue Winter, 95–117.Google Scholar
  27. Reid, S. E. and Brentani, U. D. (2004): The Fuzzy Front-End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 3.Google Scholar
  28. Romer, D. (1996): Advanced Macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill, New York u.a.O.Google Scholar
  29. Teece, D. J. (1986): Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tushman, M. L. and Anderson, P. (1986): Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.Google Scholar
  31. Tushman, M.L. and O’Reilly, C.A. (1996): Ambidextrous organisations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, California Management Review, 38, 8–30.Google Scholar
  32. Utterback, J. M. (1994): Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.Google Scholar
  33. Veryzer, R. W. (1998): Discontinuous Innovation and the New Product Development Process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 4, 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yin, R.K. (1994): Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Zirger, B.J., Madique, M. (1990), “A model of new product development: an empirical test”, Management Science, Vol. 36 pp. 867–883.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management of Innovation and TechnologyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations