Skip to main content

The Leader–Member Relationship at the Core of Innovation Development: Member Perceptions, Positions, and Expectations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge Perspectives of New Product Development

Abstract

This chapter looks into the specific issue of managing leader-member exchange in the context of innovation development. Starting out on the basis of topic-centered literature content, we aimed to pinpoint the drivers and challenges involved in the leader–member relationship in innovation-oriented settings at a high-tech firm in the semiconductors industry. Our assertions are organized into three sections. Part one begins with a review of the innovation management literature before honing in on relational management as a factor of innovation success. Part two sets out the research problem, contours the context, and details the methodology employed. Part three presents our analysis of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Amabile T. M., Khaire M. - Creativity and the role of the leader - Harvard Business Review, October 2008 – pp. 100–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrand J. – Le manager agile. Vers un nouveau management pour affronter la turbulence – Dunod, Paris, 2006, 217 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrand J. – L’entreprise de demain sera agile ou ne sera pas – Expansion Management Review, Paris, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucus M. S., Norton W. I. Jr, Baucus D. A., Human S. E. - Fostering creativity and innovation without encouraging unethical behavior - Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.81, 2008 – pp. 97–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein B., Singh P. J. – An integrated innovation process model based on practices of Australian biotechnology firms – Technovation, vol.26, 2006 – pp.561–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein B., Singh P. J. - Innovation generation process. Applying the adopter categorization model and concept of “Chasm” to better understand social and behavioral issues - European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.11 No 3, 2008 – pp. 366–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard V., Bos C. - Dispositifs intrapreneuriaux et créativité organisationnelle. Une conception tronquée  ? - Revue française de gestion, Vol.32, No 161, 2006 – pp. 95–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli A., Meitar R., Weisberg J. - Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work - International Journal of Manpower, Vol.27 No 1, 2006 – pp. 75–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatenier E. du, Verstegen J., Biemans H., Mulder M. - Towards a competence profile for inter-organizational learning in open innovation teams - Online submission: paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference in the Americas (Panama City, FL, Feb 20–24, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernez-Walch S., Romon F. – Management de l’innovation. De la stratégie aux projets – Vuibert, November 2006, 376 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O. - How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful - Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.25, 2004 – pp. 201–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O. - The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behavior - Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol.78, 2005 – pp. 573–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong J. P.J. de, Den Hartog D. N. - How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior - European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.10 No 1, 2007 – pp. 41–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleysen R. F., Street C. T. - Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior - Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.2 No 3, 2001 – pp. 284–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Magakian J.-L. - La créativité à la croisée de trois démarches: fonctionnalisme, enactment, poétique - Revue Française de Gestion, Vol.32 No 161, Feb 2006 – pp. 155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee SY – Shared emotions and group effectiveness: the role of broadening-and-building interactions – Academy of Management Journal, 2007 – Available online: http://www.bus.umich.edu/Positive/POS-Research/Conferences/AOM%20SYMPOSIA2006/Rhee-AOM%202006.pdf

  • Scott S. G., Bruce R. A. - Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace - Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37 No 3, 1994 – pp. 580–607

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-Yves Sanséau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex 1 “Regnier abacus” – the questionnaire

Annex 1 “Regnier abacus” – the questionnaire

The items analyzed in this research are reported in boldtype

A

Managing time/scheduling/deadlines

1

A project group should consider the time factor as a stone-cold imperative

2

A task schedule is always flexible and rebaselinable

3

The individual members making up our company share an identical perception of time

4

The perception of time stays identical, whatever the project

B

Managing the corporate group

5

The group’s talent capital stems from complementarity between the individual member profiles

6

Choice of team members is important leverage for program success

7

A project team needs the authority of a manager in order to tick

8

The strength of the corporate group lies in the principle of synergy (2  +  2  =  5)

9

In a team, individual ambitions are outweighed by the net performance of the group

C

Management of the member-individual

10

Managing an individual means understanding how to listen to them

11

Managing an individual means knowing how to guide them forward and coach them through

12

Managing an individual means exerting control (on performance and operations)

13

Managing an individual means knowing how to give recognition and reward

14

Management of the individual will be led differently in different situations (baseline output, incremental innovation, breakthrough innovation, etc.)

D

Handling line management

15

A firm needs a high number of line management levels

16

Line management is core to any project

17

In a project, the project leader has totally free latitude within a budget package and a timeframe

18

A project leader needs to know how to get the team involved in decision making

19

Line management’s role will be different in different situations (baseline output, incremental innovation, breakthrough innovation, etc.)

E

Handling performance

20

Performance also means achievement of an ultimate aim

21

Performance also means the right mix of resources deployed

22

Performance also means achieving results without social cost

23

A successful project is an innovation that gets to see daylight

24

Failure can sometimes be seen as a source of progress

F

Handling reward

25

Rewarding a team member means giving them financial reward

26

Rewarding a team member means giving them recognition (attention, greater independence, promotion, time, etc.)

27

Reward needs to be the same for all team members

28

If a firm wants to get performance, it continually needs to have both carrots and sticks

29

Not all individuals are receptive to the same forms of recognition

G

Handling workflow organization/procedures

30

Work organization starts by setting operating rules

31

Group work requires harmonized method sets

32

Work should be organized via a scientific approach

33

Giving greater responsibility to unqualified staff is a risky, dangerous business

34

It takes innovative organizations to conclude an innovative program

H

Handling informational exchange

35

Communication is not really necessary, given that all the information is there

36

Circulating strategic information will end up sapping the morale of the troops

37

Information is a source of power

38

Information should be handled like a flow

39

High-performing companies centralize the management of their information content

I

Customer relations management

40

Customers need to be satisfied on several criteria at the same time

41

You have to be firm with customers

42

All of my contacts (internal and external) are process customers

43

I am the first customer to all of my contacts

J

Environmental management

44

The only factors that can hold us back are technical

45

The top-down rules laid down by line management have now been ousted and replaced by agreements co-constructed bottom up by the agents involved

46

There are always options for bypassing environmental (=  ecological) regulations

K

Innovation management

47

Innovating means taking a technological leap forward

48

Innovation starts with fully understanding the full set of customer expectations

49

Innovation also means organizational transformation (line management structure, management, culture, behaviors, etc.)

50

Innovation means ushering in just the right dose of change

51

Only creative people can innovate

52

Innovation hinges on the method (framed design cycle)

53

The original idea is always a one-person creation

54

Innovation has to keep going faster and faster

55

Innovation means destruction

56

Innovation means risk

57

Innovation means taking a gamble

58

Innovation means creating value

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barrand, J., Sanséau, PY., Ferrante, G. (2012). The Leader–Member Relationship at the Core of Innovation Development: Member Perceptions, Positions, and Expectations. In: Assimakopoulos, D., Carayannis, E., Dossani, R. (eds) Knowledge Perspectives of New Product Development. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0248-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics