Abstract
This chapter looks into the specific issue of managing leader-member exchange in the context of innovation development. Starting out on the basis of topic-centered literature content, we aimed to pinpoint the drivers and challenges involved in the leader–member relationship in innovation-oriented settings at a high-tech firm in the semiconductors industry. Our assertions are organized into three sections. Part one begins with a review of the innovation management literature before honing in on relational management as a factor of innovation success. Part two sets out the research problem, contours the context, and details the methodology employed. Part three presents our analysis of the results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Amabile T. M., Khaire M. - Creativity and the role of the leader - Harvard Business Review, October 2008 – pp. 100–109
Barrand J. – Le manager agile. Vers un nouveau management pour affronter la turbulence – Dunod, Paris, 2006, 217 p.
Barrand J. – L’entreprise de demain sera agile ou ne sera pas – Expansion Management Review, Paris, 2009
Baucus M. S., Norton W. I. Jr, Baucus D. A., Human S. E. - Fostering creativity and innovation without encouraging unethical behavior - Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.81, 2008 – pp. 97–115
Bernstein B., Singh P. J. – An integrated innovation process model based on practices of Australian biotechnology firms – Technovation, vol.26, 2006 – pp.561–572
Bernstein B., Singh P. J. - Innovation generation process. Applying the adopter categorization model and concept of “Chasm” to better understand social and behavioral issues - European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.11 No 3, 2008 – pp. 366–388
Bouchard V., Bos C. - Dispositifs intrapreneuriaux et créativité organisationnelle. Une conception tronquée ? - Revue française de gestion, Vol.32, No 161, 2006 – pp. 95–109
Carmeli A., Meitar R., Weisberg J. - Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work - International Journal of Manpower, Vol.27 No 1, 2006 – pp. 75–90
Chatenier E. du, Verstegen J., Biemans H., Mulder M. - Towards a competence profile for inter-organizational learning in open innovation teams - Online submission: paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference in the Americas (Panama City, FL, Feb 20–24, 2008)
Fernez-Walch S., Romon F. – Management de l’innovation. De la stratégie aux projets – Vuibert, November 2006, 376 p.
Janssen O. - How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful - Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.25, 2004 – pp. 201–215
Janssen O. - The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behavior - Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol.78, 2005 – pp. 573–578
Jong J. P.J. de, Den Hartog D. N. - How leaders influence employees’ innovative behavior - European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.10 No 1, 2007 – pp. 41–64
Kleysen R. F., Street C. T. - Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior - Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.2 No 3, 2001 – pp. 284–296
Magakian J.-L. - La créativité à la croisée de trois démarches: fonctionnalisme, enactment, poétique - Revue Française de Gestion, Vol.32 No 161, Feb 2006 – pp. 155–167
Rhee SY – Shared emotions and group effectiveness: the role of broadening-and-building interactions – Academy of Management Journal, 2007 – Available online: http://www.bus.umich.edu/Positive/POS-Research/Conferences/AOM%20SYMPOSIA2006/Rhee-AOM%202006.pdf
Scott S. G., Bruce R. A. - Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace - Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37 No 3, 1994 – pp. 580–607
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Annex 1 “Regnier abacus” – the questionnaire
Annex 1 “Regnier abacus” – the questionnaire
The items analyzed in this research are reported in boldtype
A | Managing time/scheduling/deadlines |
1 | A project group should consider the time factor as a stone-cold imperative |
2 | A task schedule is always flexible and rebaselinable |
3 | The individual members making up our company share an identical perception of time |
4 | The perception of time stays identical, whatever the project |
B | Managing the corporate group |
5 | The group’s talent capital stems from complementarity between the individual member profiles |
6 | Choice of team members is important leverage for program success |
7 | A project team needs the authority of a manager in order to tick |
8 | The strength of the corporate group lies in the principle of synergy (2 + 2 = 5) |
9 | In a team, individual ambitions are outweighed by the net performance of the group |
C | Management of the member-individual |
10 | Managing an individual means understanding how to listen to them |
11 | Managing an individual means knowing how to guide them forward and coach them through |
12 | Managing an individual means exerting control (on performance and operations) |
13 | Managing an individual means knowing how to give recognition and reward |
14 | Management of the individual will be led differently in different situations (baseline output, incremental innovation, breakthrough innovation, etc.) |
D | Handling line management |
15 | A firm needs a high number of line management levels |
16 | Line management is core to any project |
17 | In a project, the project leader has totally free latitude within a budget package and a timeframe |
18 | A project leader needs to know how to get the team involved in decision making |
19 | Line management’s role will be different in different situations (baseline output, incremental innovation, breakthrough innovation, etc.) |
E | Handling performance |
20 | Performance also means achievement of an ultimate aim |
21 | Performance also means the right mix of resources deployed |
22 | Performance also means achieving results without social cost |
23 | A successful project is an innovation that gets to see daylight |
24 | Failure can sometimes be seen as a source of progress |
F | Handling reward |
25 | Rewarding a team member means giving them financial reward |
26 | Rewarding a team member means giving them recognition (attention, greater independence, promotion, time, etc.) |
27 | Reward needs to be the same for all team members |
28 | If a firm wants to get performance, it continually needs to have both carrots and sticks |
29 | Not all individuals are receptive to the same forms of recognition |
G | Handling workflow organization/procedures |
30 | Work organization starts by setting operating rules |
31 | Group work requires harmonized method sets |
32 | Work should be organized via a scientific approach |
33 | Giving greater responsibility to unqualified staff is a risky, dangerous business |
34 | It takes innovative organizations to conclude an innovative program |
H | Handling informational exchange |
35 | Communication is not really necessary, given that all the information is there |
36 | Circulating strategic information will end up sapping the morale of the troops |
37 | Information is a source of power |
38 | Information should be handled like a flow |
39 | High-performing companies centralize the management of their information content |
I | Customer relations management |
40 | Customers need to be satisfied on several criteria at the same time |
41 | You have to be firm with customers |
42 | All of my contacts (internal and external) are process customers |
43 | I am the first customer to all of my contacts |
J | Environmental management |
44 | The only factors that can hold us back are technical |
45 | The top-down rules laid down by line management have now been ousted and replaced by agreements co-constructed bottom up by the agents involved |
46 | There are always options for bypassing environmental (= ecological) regulations |
K | Innovation management |
47 | Innovating means taking a technological leap forward |
48 | Innovation starts with fully understanding the full set of customer expectations |
49 | Innovation also means organizational transformation (line management structure, management, culture, behaviors, etc.) |
50 | Innovation means ushering in just the right dose of change |
51 | Only creative people can innovate |
52 | Innovation hinges on the method (framed design cycle) |
53 | The original idea is always a one-person creation |
54 | Innovation has to keep going faster and faster |
55 | Innovation means destruction |
56 | Innovation means risk |
57 | Innovation means taking a gamble |
58 | Innovation means creating value |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barrand, J., Sanséau, PY., Ferrante, G. (2012). The Leader–Member Relationship at the Core of Innovation Development: Member Perceptions, Positions, and Expectations. In: Assimakopoulos, D., Carayannis, E., Dossani, R. (eds) Knowledge Perspectives of New Product Development. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0248-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0248-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0247-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0248-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)