Skip to main content

How Leading Firms Manage Product Safety in NPD

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Perspectives of New Product Development

Abstract

Empirical research has produced little evidence on the implications between NPD practices and product safety. The purpose of this paper is to explore how the leading firms manage product safety in product development in juvenile products industry. To this end, we conducted 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews in 24 leading global firms in the juvenile products industry. This paper reports the results of this exploratory investigation. Thirty-four critical to safety NPD practices are identified. Our results show that the leading firms have a strong commitment to product safety from the top management. They foster a product safety first culture in the firm and devote necessary resources to manage product safety proactively. A strong quality team in charge of product safety is prevalent in these firms. Most importantly, the firms have a formal, well-executed NPD process with cross-functional team in charge of product development from concept to launch. Integrating NPD process with hazard analysis and product safety review by quality/safety engineers is critical to safety and was found pervasive in these firms. Our interviews also uncovered a number of major issues on product safety management in NPD that most firms are facing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott H., and Tyler, M., (1997), Safer by Design: A guide to the management and law of designing for product safety, 2nd edition. Gower Publishing Limited, Aldershot, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barczak, G., Griffin, A., and Kahn, K.B., (2009), Perspective: trends and drivers of success in NPD Practices: results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of product innovation management, Vol. 26, pp. 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bapuji, H. and Beamish, P.W., (2008), Product recalls: Avoid hazardous design flaws. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, 3, pp. 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, P.W. and Bapuji, H., (2008), Toy recalls and China: Emotion vs. Evidence, Management and Organization Review, Vol. 4, 2, pp.197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R.P., ed., (1943), Industry safety, Prentice-Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. L. and Holmes, H. (1986). The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J.R. and Ellram, L.M., (1994), The impact of interorganizational alliances in improving supplier quality, International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, Vol. 24, 5, pp.15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, W. C., (2003), Safety through design. Professional safety, Mar 2003, Vol 48, 3, pp. 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G., Edgett S.J. and Kleinschmidt E.J., (2004a), Benchmarking Best Practices –I, Research technology management, Vol. 47, 1, pp.31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______, (2004b), Benchmarking Best Practices –II. Research technology management, Vol. 47, 3, pp. 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______, (2004c), Benchmarking Best Practices –IIII. Research technology management, Vol. 47, 6, pp. 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschmidt E.J., (1995), Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development, Journal of product innovation management, Vol.12, pp. 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _______, (2007), Winning business in product development: the critical success factors. Research technology management, Vol. 50, 3, pp.52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. and Cox, T., (1991), The structure of employee attitudes to safety: an European example. Work and Stress, 12, 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeDobbeleer, N. and Beland, F. (1991), A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research, 22, 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eads, G. and Reuter, P., (1983), Designing safer products: Corporate responses to product liability law and regulation, The rand corporation – The institute for civil justice, Santa Monica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodden, R., (1995), Preventing and handling product liability. Marcel Dekker Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______, (Jan 2008), Seminar on Product Safety and Liability Prevention. Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gookins, E.F., (2005), Are you ready to defend your product in court?. ASQ world conference on quality and improvement proceedings. Milwaukee, 2005. Vol. 59, pp. 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A., (1997), PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices, Journal of product innovation management, Vol. 14, pp. 429–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A., and Hauser, J.R., (1993), The voice of customer, Marketing Science, Vol. 12, no. 1, pp 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield R.B. and Lawson B., (Sept-Oct 2007), Integrate suppliers into new product development, Research Technology Management, Vol. 50, 5, pp. 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, H. W., (1931), Industry accident prevention: A scientific approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, C.J., Tyler, M. and Abbott, H., (1996). Product safety, first edition, Sweet and Maxwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D.A. and Stetzer, A. (1996), A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents personnel, Psychology, 49, 307–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalin, S.R., (1994), Safety starts on the drawing board, Professional Safety, Vol.39, 12, pp. 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • KID (Kids In Danager), (June 15, 2008), 2007: The year of the recall-An examination of juvenile product recalls in 2007 and the implications for child safety, http://www.KidsInDanager.org. Accessed 15 June 2008.

  • Kitzes, W.F., (1991), Safety management and the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Professional safety, Vol. 36, 4, pp.25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, J. and Ross, S. S., (1980), Product safety and liability: A desk reference. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lascelles, D.M. and Dale, B.G., (1989), The buyer-supplier relationship in total quality management, Journal of purchasing and materials management, Vol. 25, 3, pp.10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, B.W., (2002), Design reviews: checkpoints for design. Professional Safety; Jan 2002, Vol. 47,1, pp.27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______, (2004), Risk assessment. Professional Safety; Dec 2004, Vol. 49, 12, pp.37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______, and Frantz, J.P., (1994), How design engineers address safety: What the safety community should know. Professional Safety; Feb 1994; Vol. 39, 2, pp.22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______, and McMurphy, K.J., (1998), Safer by design: Reducing hazards through better designs. Professional Safety; Feb98, Vol. 43,2, pp.29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S.R., and Eubanks, F., (2005) Risk tools for technical development hazard analysis and FMEA. The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, pp.430–441, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, A.L., (1993), Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 10, 4, pp.273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primo M. A.M. and Amundson S.D., (2002), An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 20, pp. 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransley, D.L. and Rogers, T.J., (1994), A consensus on best R&D practices. Research technology management, Vol. 37, 2, pp.19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, H. E. and Moriarty, B., (1983), System safety engineering and management. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, P.A., Saad, K.M. and Erickson, T.J., (1991), Third generation R&D management. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J.P., (1988), Hazard analysis guidelines in product design, Professional Safety, Vol 33, 3, pp.17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan K.E., (2003), Product liability risk control. Professional Safety, Feb 2003, Vol 48, 2, pp.20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraph, J., Benson, P. and Schroeder R., (1989), An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management, Decision Sciences, Vol. 20, 4, pp. 810–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thia, C.W., Chai, K.H., Bauly, J., and Xin, Y., (2005), An exploratory of the use of quality tools and techniques in product development. The TQM Magazine, Vol. 17, 5, pp. 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Zedtwitz, M., (2003), Post-project reviews in R&D, Research Technology Management. Sep/Oct 2003; 46, 5; pp. 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N. and Frohlich, M. (2002), Case research in operations management, International journal of operations & production management, Vol. 22, 2, pp. 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. and Pomponi, R., (2003), Gain a competitive edge by preventing recalls, Quality Progress, Vol. 36, 8, pp. 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1994), Case study research, Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, A.Y., von Zedtwitz, M., and Assimakopoulos, D., (2010), How new product development impacts product safety? 2010 Academy of Management Annual Conference Paper, Montreal Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirger, B.J. and Maidique, M.A., (1990), A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Science, Vol. 36, 7, pp. 867–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., (1980). Safety Climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology,65, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andy Yunlong Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhu, A.Y., Assimakopoulos, D.G., von Zedtwitz, M. (2012). How Leading Firms Manage Product Safety in NPD. In: Assimakopoulos, D., Carayannis, E., Dossani, R. (eds) Knowledge Perspectives of New Product Development. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0248-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics