Skip to main content

Maladaptive Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Meaningful Information

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Biology ((BRIEFSBIOL,volume 1))

  • 1033 Accesses

Abstract

One of the great marvels of evolution is how finely matched every species is to the ecosystem in which it lives, for natural selection weeds out the genes of its less well-adapted members. Homo sapiens is an anomaly in this grand scheme of things, since we are prone to a wide range of maladaptive behaviors that diminish our well-being and survival, including consuming addictive substances, behaving irresponsibly, and ingesting more calories than we need. Although evolution has provided us with a brain that is able to use the information it detects to build models of how the world works, there is no mechanism for assuring that the information is correct or that the models are accurate. Most of our maladaptive behaviors are due to defects in the way we create symbolic representations, interpret meaning, and set goals for ourselves, since these processes are all subject to error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Notes

     Linden (2007) describes the human brain as “a cobbled-together mess” in which newer structures and newer functions have just been layered over older ones as a result of evolution, rather than being “designed” to fit together or replace them.

  2. 2.

     Within-species violence can result in a reproductive advantage for the aggressors by eliminating potential competitors. Genes that predispose to such behavior can thus become increasingly represented in a population if it has no countervailing measures to limit them (Wrangham and Peterson 1996). Most cultures have developed social, moral, and legal sanctions for controlling aggression within social and ethnic groups, but not necessarily between them.

  3. 3.

     Science represents a systematic way of understanding how the universe functions. It differs from our individual ways of determining truth and falsity in that it endeavors to gain a broad consensus about its findings by performing controlled experiments, having others replicate and verify its results, reducing subjective biases, and stating its beliefs and assumptions explicitly. Scientists arrive at the truth by systematically identifying things that are untrue and building theories and models based on facts and ideas that have survived the attempts to refute them.

  4. 4.

     Behavioral economics is a relatively new discipline that studies the psychological factors that bias logical decision making and examines why markets are not always predictable on the basis of rational expectations (Kahneman and Tversky 2000). In addition to the distortions caused by faults in our individual mental models, there are a number of built-in information-processing biases that affect the decisions all of us make. These include tendencies to be averse to loss, favor the immediate over the deferred, and overestimate our own abilities. Most choices are affected by the way the options are presented, so that the items purchased at a supermarket are influenced by where they are placed on the shelves (Thaler and Sunstein 2008). We also tend to follow others rather than rely on our own judgment, especially when they seem to know what they are doing, since we mistakenly equate the strength of their convictions with how correct they are. Marcus (2008, p. 60) describes various cognitive errors that interfere with our ability to think rationally and distort the decisions we make. As he observes, “While evolution gave us the gift of deliberate reasoning, it lacked the vision to make sure we used it wisely.”

  5. 5.

     The prefrontal cortex is a part of the brain that is significantly more developed in humans than in other primates. It is located at the front of the brain, where it causes our foreheads to bulge outward rather than slant backwards, like those of our primate cousins and hominid ancestors (Preuss 2000). It plays a central role in orchestrating our executive and decision-making abilities, including planning for the future and choosing between different courses of action (Struss and Benson 1986; Fuster 1997). Patients with gross damage to this area are typically unable to initiate future-directed behavior and, as a result, spend their days mostly in the present, without ambition, foresight, or spontaneity (Bechra et al. 1994).

References

  • Bechra A, Damasio A, Damasio H, Anderson S (1994) Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50: 7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brafman O, Brafman R (2008) Sway: The Irresistible Pull of Irrational Behavior. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüne M (2008) Textbook of Evolutionary Psychiatry: The Origins of Psychopathology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank J (1961) Persuasion and Healing. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuster JM (1997) The Prefrontal Cortex, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson P (2004) The Cradle of Thought: Exploring the Origins of Thinking. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel T (2010) Understanding Mental Disorders as Circuit Disorders. Cerebrum, February Issue. The Dana Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (2000) Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing RD (1982) The Voice of Experience. Pantheon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden DJ (2007) The Accidental Mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire M, Troisi A (1998) Darwinian Psychiatry. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus G (2008) Kludge: The Haphazard Construction of the Human Mind. Houghton Mifflin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuss TM (2000) What’s human about human behavior? In MS Gazzaninga (Ed), The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schretlen DJ (2007) The nature and significance of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Johns Hopkins Advanced Studies in Medicine 7(3): 72–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Struss DT, Benson DF (1986) The Frontal Lobes. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulloway FJ (1982) Darwin and his finches: the evolution of a legend. J. Hist. Biol. 15:1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham R, Peterson D (1996) Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence. Mariner Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Reading .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reading, A. (2011). Maladaptive Behavior. In: Meaningful Information. SpringerBriefs in Biology, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0158-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics