Skip to main content

ICT Solutions to Support EV Deployment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Electric Vehicle Integration into Modern Power Networks

Abstract

Numerous studies and projects have proven that the electric vehicle can offer value and services that go beyond its function as a means of transportation. The value and services can, for instance, be the reduction of charging costs, adherence to grid constraints, or adjustment of charging behavior to renewable energy production. If these possibilities are considered and supported by information and communication technologies (ICT) in due time, a large potential can be exploited.

Specifically, the protocols and technologies spanning the open system interconnection stack need to support the various utilization concepts for EVs and be harmonized to obtain interoperability among numerous electric vehicle (EV) and electric vehicle supply equipment from original equipment manufacturers.

This chapter describes contemporary Smart Grid communication methods in terms of requirements and specific solutions and relates them to relevant standardization work and projects within the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/.

  2. 2.

    For brevity, the “ISO” part will often be omitted when referring to the standard.

  3. 3.

    Supply equipment communication controller.

  4. 4.

    A large part of the OpenV2G source code seems to be auto generated by various EXI tools that are not provided along with the code. The use of auto generated code makes sense, however, because it could become quite cumbersome to define all types manually in C when they are already defined using XSD in IEC 15118.

  5. 5.

    A total frequency range from 3 to 148.5 kHz is available for utilities whereas for end-user application the 95 to 148.5 kHz band is available.

  6. 6.

    http://www.g3-plc.com.

  7. 7.

    Recall that EVSEs typically contain an energy meter, which might be relevant to communicate with using G3 or PRIME. This communication might be completely separated from the EV to EVSE communication link.

  8. 8.

    http://standards.ieee.org/develop/project/1901.2.html.

  9. 9.

    Many (older) technologies are single-carrier based, but these are not applicable in an SG or EV context [19].

  10. 10.

    Adapted from [19].

Abbreviations

ACSI:

Abstract communication service interface

AMI:

Advanced metering infrastructure

AMM:

Automated meter management

AMR:

Automatic meter reading

AP:

Access point

BPSK:

Binary phase shift keying

CA:

Certificate authentication

CAMC:

Central autonomous management controller

CP:

Control pilot

CSMA/CA:

Carrier sense multiple access/collision avoidance

DER:

Distributed energy resource

DMS:

Distribution management system

DR:

Demand response

DSO:

Distribution system operator

DSSS:

Direct sequence spread spectrum

EAN:

Extended area network

EB:

Energy box

EMS:

Energy management system

EPRI:

Electric Power Research Institute

ES:

Electric storage

EV:

Electric vehicle

EVSE:

Electric vehicle supply equipment

FAN:

Field area network

FC:

Functional constraint

FDD:

Frequency division duplex

FEC:

Forward error correction

Gbps:

Gigabit per second

GW:

Gateway

HAN:

Home area network

IAP:

Interoperability architectural perspective

IP:

Internet protocol

IT:

Information technology

kbps:

Kilobit per second

LW:

Low voltage

MAC:

Media access control

MAP:

Mesh access point

Mbps:

Megabits per second

MG:

Microgrid

MGAU:

Microgrid aggregator unit

MGCC:

Microgrid central controller

MMG:

Multi-microgrid

MMS:

Manufacturing message specification

MV:

Medium voltage

NAN:

Neighborhood area network

NB-PLC:

Narrowband power line communication

ND:

Neighbor discovery

NIST:

National Institute for Standards and Technology

OEM:

Original equipment manufacturer

OFDM:

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing

OFDMA:

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing access

OSI:

Open systems interconnection

PAM:

Pulse amplitude modulation

PKI:

Public key infrastructure

PLC:

Power line communication

PWM:

Pulse width modulation

QAM:

Quadrature amplitude modulation

QoS:

Quality of service

RAU:

Regional aggregation unit

RBAC:

Role based access control

REST:

Representational state transfer

SCL:

Structured configuration language

SCSM:

Specific communication service mapping

SDO:

Standard development organization

SDP:

SECC Discovery Protocol

SG:

Smart grid

SGIRM:

Smart grid interoperability reference model

SM:

Smart meter

SOC:

State-of-charge

TCP:

Transmission control protocol

TDD:

Time division duplex

TLS:

Transport layer security

ToW:

Time-on-wire

UAN:

Utility access network

UDP:

User datagram protocol

V2G:

Vehicle-to-grid

WAN:

Wide area network

WMN:

Wireless mesh network

XML:

Extensible markup language

References

  1. RWE Mobility. www.rwemobility.com

  2. Electric vehicles in a distributed and integrated market using sustainable energy and open networks – EDISON. www.edison-net.dk

  3. The grid-integrated vehicle with vehicle to grid technology. http://www.udel.edu/V2G/

  4. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) TC57 WG 15 (e.g. IEC 62351). http://tc57.iec.ch

  5. NIST (2010) NIST framework and roadmap for smart grid interoperability standards, release 1.0. Office of the National Coordinator for Smart Grid Interoperability

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Technology Platform, Smart Grids (2010) Strategic deployment document for Europe’s electricity networks of the future

    Google Scholar 

  7. EPRI (2009) Report to NIST on smart grid interoperability standards roadmap

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khalifa T, Naik K, Nayak A (2011) A survey of communication protocols for automatic meter reading applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 13(2):168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. IEEE (1998) IEEE standard for utility industry end device data tables. IEEE Std 1377(1997):i

    Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Energy (2010) Communications requirements of smart grid technologies

    Google Scholar 

  11. Open Smart Grid (Open SG) (2010) SG network system requirements specification, interim release 3, 17 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peças Lopes JA, Moreira CL, Madureira AG (2006) Defining control strategies for microgrids islanded operation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(2):916–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gil NJ, Peças Lopes JA (2007) Hierarchical frequency control scheme for islanded multi-microgrids operation. In: Proceeding of IEEE power tech, Lausanne, 1–5 July 2007, pp 473–478

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peças Lopes JA, Soares FJ, Rocha Almeida PM (2011) Integration of electric vehicles in the electric power system. Proc IEEE 99(1):168–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. IEEE (2011) IEEE guide for smart grid interoperability of energy technology and information technology operation with the electric power system (EPS), end-use applications, and loads. IEEE Std 2030–2011, pp 1–126, 10 Sep 2011

    Google Scholar 

  16. NIST (2009) The role of the internet protocol (IP) in AMI networks for smart grid. NIST Priority Action Plan, Jun 2009

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baker F, Meyer D (2011) Internet protocols for the smart grid. Request for comments RFC 6272, IETF, Jun 2011

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scholer R. Standards status ISO/IEC & SAE. http://www.pointview.com/data/2011/05/51/pdf/Rich-Scholer-KEPKKETS-11326.pdf

  19. Galli S, Scaglione A, Wang Z. Power line communications and the smart grid

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tonello A, Katayama M (2011) Power line communications for the smart grid, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  21. Low frequency, narrowband PLC standards for smart grid. http://cms.comsoc.org/SiteGen/Uploads/Public/Docs_Globecom_2009/6_-_12-03-09_shaver_smart_grid_panel_final.pdf

  22. Hoch M (2011) Comparison of PLC G3 and PRIME. In: IEEE international symposium on power line communications and its applications, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  23. IEC (2010) IEC smart grid standardization roadmap

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oksman V, Zhang J (2011) G.HNEM: the new ITU-T standard on narrowband PLC technology. IEEE Commun Mag 49(12):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oksman V (2011) New ITU-T recommendations for smart grid in-home access communications. Presentation, April 2011

    Google Scholar 

  26. HomePlug Powerline Alliance (2001) HomePlug 1.0 white paper

    Google Scholar 

  27. HomePlug Powerline Alliance (2005) Home Plug AV white paper

    Google Scholar 

  28. HomePlug Powerline Alliance (2010) HomePlug green PHY white paper- Home Plug green PHY, The standard for in-home smart grid powerline communications

    Google Scholar 

  29. IEEE standard for broadband over power line networks: medium access control and physical layer specifications. IEEE Std 1901–2010, pp 1–1586, 30 Dec 2010

    Google Scholar 

  30. ITU-T (2010) Series G: transmission systems and media, digital systems and networks, applications of ITU-T G.9960, ITU-T G.9961 transceivers for Smart Grid applications: advanced metering infrastructure, energy management in home and electric vehicles, June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  31. IEEE 802.11-2007. IEEE standard for information technology – telecommunications and information exchange between systems – local and metropolitan area networks – specific requirements – part 11: wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications

    Google Scholar 

  32. IEEE 802.11n-2009. IEEE standard for information technology – telecommunications and information exchange between systems – local and metropolitan area networks – specific requirements – part 11: wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications – amendment 5: enhancements for higher throughput

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Wi-Fi Alliance. http://www.wi-fi.org/

  34. IEEE 802.15.4-2006. IEEE standard for information technology – telecommunications and information exchange between systems – local and metropolitan area networks – specific requirements – part 15.4: wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs)

    Google Scholar 

  35. The ZigBee Alliance. http://www.zigbee.org/

  36. IEEE 802.16-2009. IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks – part 16: air interface for broadband wireless access systems, May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  37. The WiMAX Forum. http://www.wimaxforum.org/

  38. Gambiroza V, Sadeghi B, Knightly E (2004) End-to-end performance and fairness in multihop wireless backhaul networks. In: MobiCom’04 - tenth annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, Philadelphia, USA, 26 Sept–1 Oct 2004, pp 287–301

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ernst J, Denko M (2011) The design and evaluation of fair scheduling in wireless mesh networks. J Comput Syst Sci 77(4):652–664

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee J, Kuo W (2010) Fairness provisioning in multi-hop wireless backhaul networks: challenges and solutions. Comput Commun 33(15):1767–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gupta G, Shroff N (2010) Practical scheduling schemes with throughput guarantees for multi-hop wireless networks. Comput Netw 54(5):766–780

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Akyol U, Andrews M, Gupta P, Hobby J, Saniee I, Stolyar A (2008) Joint scheduling and congestion control in mobile ad-hoc networks. In: INFOCOM 2008 - 27th annual IEEE conference on computer communications, Phoenix, USA, 13–18 April 2008, pp 619–627

    Google Scholar 

  43. ISO/IEC (2011) Road vehicles—vehicle-to-grid communication interface - part 2: technical protocol description and open systems interconnections

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pedersen AB, Hauksson EB, Anders PB, Poulsen B, Træholt C, Gantenbein D (2010) Facilitating a generic communication interface to distributed energy resources mapping IEC 61850 to RESTful services. IEEE SmartGridComm 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Bro Pedersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pedersen, A.B., Andersen, B., Johansen, J.S., Rua, D., Ruela, J., Lopes, J.A.P. (2013). ICT Solutions to Support EV Deployment. In: Garcia-Valle, R., Peças Lopes, J. (eds) Electric Vehicle Integration into Modern Power Networks. Power Electronics and Power Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0134-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0134-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0133-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0134-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics