Abstract
The first oil on the Norwegian continental shelf was found at the Ekofisk field in the southern North Sea in 1969. Several new discoveries were made in the years after, and from 1973, the Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (SFT from 2010 Climate And Pollution Agency (Klif)) required that all the licensed companies should submit annual reports on the environmental conditions in their impact areas. This requirement was one of the conditions for discharge permits, and guidance was given on the minimum scope and content of the environmental surveys to be performed. The annual reports quickly demonstrated that there was a need for better harmonisation of the monitoring methods to be used. In 1987 SFT and the offshore operators jointly hosted a 2-day workshop to agree on a common strategy and methodology for offshore baseline and monitoring surveys. On the basis of the workshop outcome, an expert group appointed by SFT developed a guideline document for sediment monitoring that was subsequently discussed in an open forum with the offshore operators. The guidelines were put into force in 1988 and in the same year they were adopted by the Paris Commission for use in the convention waters (PARCOM 1989). In 1991 the guidelines (SFT 1990) were made mandatory for monitoring around Norwegian fields. In 1997 the guidelines were revised. A concept of regional monitoring was introduced, and guidelines for monitoring of the water column were included (SFT 1997). The latter was a response to the change in impact focus from discharge of drilling waste to produced water (PW). In 1993 strong restrictions ended regular discharges of oily drill cuttings. At the same time, national prognoses estimated an increase in PW discharges from around 25 million m3/yr in 1993 to more than 250 million m3/yr in 2009. Subsequent minor guideline revisions were made in 1999, (SFT 1999) and 2010 (Klif 2009).
Keywords
- Produce Water
- Environmental Condition Monitoring
- Drilling Waste
- Petroleum Activity
- Norwegian Continental Shelf
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A white paper from 2011 has withdrawn the specific requirements for Arctic developments and the same “zero discharge” policy is now applicable for the entire Norwegian continental shelf.
References
Bakke T, Nilssen I (2004) Harmonised monitoring of offshore drilling waste effects in Norway. In: Armsworthy SL, Cranford PJ, Lee K (eds) Proceedings of the offshore oil and gas environmental effects monitoring workshop: approaches and technologies. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH
Cranford PJ, Gordon Jr DC, Lee K, Armsworthy SL, Tremblay G-H (1999) Chronic toxicity and physical disturbance effects of water- and oil-based drilling fluids and some major constituents on adult sea scallops (Placopecten magellanicus). Mar Envir Res 48:225–256
Durell G, Utvik TR, Johnsen S, Frost T, Neff J (2006) Oil well produced water discharges to the North Sea. Part I: Comparison of deployed mussels (Mytilus edulis), semi-permeable membrane devices, and the DREAM model predictions to estimate the dispersion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Mar Environ Res 62:194–223
Hylland K, Becker G, Klungsøyr J, Lanf T., McIntosh A, Serigstad B, Thain JE, Thomas KV, Utvik TIR, Vethaak D, Wosniok W (2002) An ICES workshop on biological effects in pelagic ecosystems (BECPELAG): summary of results and recommendations. ICES ASC 2002 CM 2002/X:13
Gray JS, Bakke T, Beck HJ, Nilssen I (1999) Managing the environmental effects of the Norwegian oil and gas industry: from conflict to consensus. Mar Pollut Bull 38:525–530
Johnsen S, Frost TK, Hjelsvold M, Utvik TR (2000) The environmental impact factor – a proposed tool for produced water impact reduction, management and regulation. SPE paper 61178. SPE Int Conf, Stavanger, Norway
Klif 2009. Guidelines for environmental monitoring. Climate and Pollution Agency Report TA-2586/2009 (in Norwegian)
Olsen GH, Carrol ML, Renaud PE, Ambrose WG Jr, Olssøn R Carrol J (2007) Benthic community response to petroleum-associated components in Arctic versus temperate marine sediments. Mar Biol 151:2167–2176
Olsgard F, Gray JS (1995) A comprehensive analysis of the effects of offshore oil and gas exploration and production on the benthic communities of the Norwegian continental shelf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 122:277–306
PARCOM (1989) Guidelines for monitoring methods to be used in the vicinity of platforms in the North Sea. Chameleon Press, London
Reiersen LO, Gray JS, Palmork KH, Lange R (1988). Monitoring in the vicinity of oil and gas platforms: results from the Norwegian sector of the North Sea and recommended methods for forthcoming surveillance. In: Engelhardt FR, Ray JP, Gillam AH (eds) Drilling waste. Elsevier, London
Renaud PE, Jensen T, Wassbotten I, Mannvik HP, Botnen H (2008) Offshore sediment monitoring on the Norwegian shelf. A regional approach 1996–2006. Report no 3487-003. Akvaplan-niva AS, Tromsø
Schaanning MT, Trannum HC, Øxnevad S, Carroll J, Bakke T (2008) Effects of drill cuttings on biogeochemical fluxes and macrobenthos of marine sediments. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 361:49–57
SFT (1990) Manual for monitoring surveys around petroleum installations in Norwegian marine areas (in Norwegian). SFT 90:01 TA-699/1990. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, Oslo
SFT (1997) Guidelines for Environmental Monitoring of the Petroleum Activity on the Norwegian Shelf (in Norwegian). SFT 97:01 TA-1424/1997. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, Oslo
SFT (1999) Environmental monitoring of the petroleum activity on the Norwegian shelf (in Norwegian). SFT 99:01 TA-1641/1999. Appendix 1 to the Information Duty Regulations Requirements for Reporting from Offshore Petroleum Activities. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, Oslo. http://www.sft.no/arbeidsomr/petroleum
Sundt RC, Ruus A, Grung M, Pampanin DM, Barsiene J, Skarphedinsdottir H (2006) Water column monitoring 2006. Summary report. Report AM 2006/013. Akvamiljø, Stavanger
UNIFOB (2007) Environmental monitoring of oil and gas fields in Region II, 2006. UNIFOB, Bergen (in Norwegian with English summary)
Acknowledgements
This chapter is based on a large number of survey reports produced by numerous consulting companies on contract from the offshore operators. The ones referred directly to are cited, and the others are hereby thanked collectively for their contribution. This chapter has been prepared under contract 4008001 from the Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (SFT) to the Norwegian Institute for Water Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bakke, T., Green, A.M.V., Iversen, P.E. (2011). Offshore Environmental Effects Monitoring in Norway – Regulations, Results and Developments. In: Lee, K., Neff, J. (eds) Produced Water. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0046-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0046-2_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0045-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0046-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)