Abstract
X-ray diffraction patterns using continuous radiation from copper and tungsten target x-ray tubes and detected with a Si(Li) energy analysis system are presented. Errors caused by a misaligned diffractometer and x-ray penetration into the sample are shown to be more difficult to correct and larger in magnitude than errors arising from energy calibration. All these errors can be minimized by mixing a standard with the unknown sample.
The energy resolution of the detector influences the breadth of the diffraction peaks more strongly than the standard slit systems available with commercial diffractometers. Thus, to reduce the recording time and maintain the same standard deviation for the data, one should increase the sizes of the front and receiving slits including the Soller slits. X-ray energy diffraction patterns can be recorded with standard deviations less than ±0.001 Å in the d spacing with only 200 sec measurement time using the standard diffractometer slit system. Copper targets are probably as useful as tungsten even though the continuous intensity is about three times less. Copper has fewer interfering characteristic lines, and its use permits convenient conversion to normal 0 scanning diffractometer operation.
Research sponsored by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission under contract with the Union Carbide Corporation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
B. C. Giessen and G. E. Gordon, “X-Ray Diffraction: New High Speed Technique Based on X-ray Spectrography,” Science 159, 973–975 (1968).
Energy Dispersion X-Ray Analysis: X-Ray and Electron Probe Analysis, Amer. Soc. Test. Mater. Spec. Tech. Publ. 485, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1971).
I. G. Edmunds, H. Lipson, and H. Steeple, “The Determination of Accurate Lattice Parameters,” Chap. 15 in X-Ray Diffraction by Polycrystalline Materials, ed. by H. S. Peiser, H. P. Roaksby, and A.J.C. Wilson, The Institute of Physics, London (1955).
J. A. Bearden, X-Ray Wavelengths, NYO-10586, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Division of Technical Information (1964).
A. J. C. Wilson, “Geiger-Counter X-Ray Spectrometer — Influence of Size and Absorption Coefficient of Specimen on Position and Shape of Powder Diffraction Maxima,” J. Sci. Instr. 27, 321–325 (1950).
H. Cole, “Bragg’s Law and Energy Sensitive Detectors,” J. Appl. Cryst. 3, 405 (1970).
J. V. Gilfrich and L. S. Birks, “Spectral Distribution of X-Ray Tubes for Quantitative X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,” Anal. Chem. 40, 1077–1080 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1972 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sparks, C.J. (1972). Rapid Recording of Powder Diffraction Patterns with Si(Li) X-Ray Energy Analysis System: W and Cu Targets and Error Analysis. In: Heinrich, K.F.J., Barrett, C.S., Newkirk, J.B., Ruud, C.O. (eds) Advances in X-Ray Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9966-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9966-7_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9968-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9966-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive