Lab Tests of a Thermomechanical Pump for SHOOT

  • Michael J. DiPirro
  • Robert F. Boyle
Part of the A Cryogenic Engineering Conference Publication book series (ACRE, volume 33)


Laboratory tests of a thermomechanical (TM) pump utilizing a commercially available porous disk have been conducted. Various size disks, heater configurations and outlet flow impedances have been used to characterize scale models of the pump proposed for the Superfluid Helium On-Orbit Transfer (SHOOT) Flight Experiment. The results yield the scalability of the TM pump to larger diameters and hence larger pumping rates, the dependance of flow rate on back pressure and heater power, and the limits of pumping speed due to internal losses within the porous disk due to mutual and superfluid friction. Analysis indicates that for low back pressures the flow rate is limited by the superfluid friction rather than the mutual friction. For the porous plug used in the early tests this amounts to a practical limit of 4.4 liters per hour per square centimeter. For our baselined flight plug area of 180 cm2 this yields 790 liters per hour.


Heat Flow Critical Velocity Heater Power Superfluid Helium Flight Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. R. Breon, Liquid helium servicing from the space station, 1987 Space Cryogenics Workshop, Madison, to be published in Cryogenics.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. J. DiPirro and S. H. Castles, Superfluid helium flight demonstration using the thermomechanical effect, Cryogenics2fi: 84 (1986).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. J. DiPirro and P. Kittel, The superfluid helium on orbit transfer flight demonstration, Paper No. DA-3, 1987 Cryogenic Engineering Conference.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Kittel, Losses in fountain effect pumps, Proc.11th International Cryogenic Engineering Conference, Butterworth, London, (1986) p. 317.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    see for instance, J. Wilks, “The Properties of Liquid and Solid Helium”, Clarendon Press, Oxford, (1967).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.T. Tough, Prog. Low Temp. Phys 8: 135 (1982).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. E. Keller, “Helium-3 and Helium-4”, Plenum, NY, (1969) p. 321.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. E. Anderson, D. A. Fester, and M. J. DiPirro, Acquisition system testing with superfluid helium, 1987 CEC, Paper FC-2.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. J. DiPirro, The Superfluid Helium On-Orbit Transfer flight experiment: performance estimates, 1987 Space Cryogenics Workshop, Madison, to be published in Cryogenics.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. E. Keller and E. F. Hammel, Physics2: 221 (1966).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U. Schotte and S. Kasthuriringan, Proc. Space Helium Dewar Conference. Huntsville (1983), p. 109; R. Srinivasan and A. Hofmann, Cryogenics 25: 641 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. L. Mills, et al., Experiments on transferring helium II with a thermomechanical pump, 1987 CEC, Paper BC-3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. DiPirro
    • 1
  • Robert F. Boyle
    • 1
  1. 1.NASA/Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations