Advertisement

Superconducting Magnets for Fusion Applications

  • C. D. Henning
Part of the A Cryogenic Engineering Conference Publication book series (ACRE, volume 33)

Abstract

Fusion magnet technology has made spectacular advances in the past decade; to wit, the Mirror Fusion Test Facility and the Large Coil Project, However, further advances are still required for advanced economigal fusion reactors. Higher fields to 14 T and radiation-hardened supercgndugtors and insulators Will be necessary. Coupled with high rates of nuclear heating and pulsed losses, the next-generation magnets will need still higher current density, better stability and quench protection. Cable-in-conduit gonductors coupled with polyimide insulations and yetter steels seem to be the appropriate path. Neutron fluences up to 1019 neutrons/cm2 in niobium tin are achievable, In the future, other amorphous superconductors could raise these limits further to extend reactor life or decrease the neutron shielding and corresponding reactor size.

Keywords

Critical Current Neutron Fluence Superconducting Magnet International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor Cyclic Stress Amplitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. D. Henning, et al., “Large Superconducting Baseball Magnet, Part II,” 8th Int. Cong. of Refrigeration, Int.rnational Institute of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., Aug. 27 - Sept. 3, 1971.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. R. Efferson, et al., “The IMP Superconducting Coil System,” 4th Symposium on Engineering Problems of Fusion Research, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., April 20–23, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Ivanov, Private Communication, Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, (1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. D. Henning, et al., “Mirror Fusion Test Facility Magnet System - Final Design Report,” UCRL-52955, (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. H. Krause, T. A. Kozman, J. L. Smith, R. J. Horan, “MFTF-B PACE Tests and Final Cost Report,” UCID-20819, (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hitachi Corporation - TriAM-1M Magnet System for Kyushu University, (1986).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Aymar, et al., “TORE SUPRA-Status Report,” Magnetics MAG-17. No. 5: 1911, (1981).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Kadomtsev, Private Communication, (1986).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. N. Haubenreich, et al., “Procurement and Testing of Superconducting Toroidal Field Coils in the Large Coil Program,” Seventh Symposium on Engineering Problems of Fusion Research, Knoxville, (1977).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. D. Henning, B. G. Logan, et al., “TIBER II Tokamak Ignition/Burn Experimental Reactor,” 1986 Status Report, UCID-20863, (1986).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. R. Miller, C. D. Henning, J. A. Kerns, D. S. Slack, L. T. Summers, J. P. Zbasnik, “High Current Density Magnets for INTOR and TIBER,” UCRL-95759, (1986).Google Scholar
  12. J. L. Young, et al., The Force Flow Cooled Coils for the International Energy Agency Large Coil Task,“ Adv. Cryog. Eng. 27: 11, (1982).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. O. Hoenig, et al., “MIT 12 Tesla Coil Experimental Results,” Adv. Cryog. Ens_ 31: 151, (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. R. Miller, et al., “The Initial Filament Strain State of Cablein-Conduit Superconductors and Its Relation to the Design of Large-Bore, High-Field Magnets,” paper submitted for presentation at the 1986 Applied Superconductivity Conference, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. M. Steeves, et al., “Effects of Incoloy 903 and Tantalum Conduits on Critical Current in Nb Sn Cable-in-Conduit Conductors,” Adv. Cryog. Ens. 30: 883, (1981).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. M. Scanlan, et al., Mechanical Properties of High-Current Multifilamentary Nb Sn Conductors in: “Filamentary A15 Superconductors, M.3Suenga and A. F. Clark, Eds. Plenum Press, New York (1980), p. 221.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Flukiger, W. Maurer, and F. Weiss, P. Hahn and M. Guinan, High-Field Magnet Workshop, Karlsruhe, FRG, (1986).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. P. Coltman, Jr., “Radiation Effects on Organic Insulators for Superconducting Magnets,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, ORNL TM-7077, (1979).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. B. Kasen, “Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Filamentary-Reinforced Structural Composites at Cryogenic Temperatures-1: Glass-Reinforced Composites,” Cryogenics 15:327–49, (1975).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. R. Benzinger, “The Manufacture and Properties of Radiation-Resistant Laminates,” presented at the ICEC Conference, San Diego, CA, August (1981).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Evans and J. T. Morgan, “A Review of the Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Plastic Materials at Low Temperatures,” Rutherford Laboratory, Didcot Berkshire England presented at the ICEC Conference, San Diego, CA, August 1981.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Van de Voorde, Ed., “Low Temperature Irradiation Effects on Materials and Components for Superconducting Magnets for High Energy Physics Applications,” CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, Report CERN 77–03, (1977).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Guess, et al., “A Survey of Radiation Damage Effects in Superconducting Magnet Components and Systems,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, ORNL TM-5787, (1975).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Weber, E. Kubasta, W. Steiner, H. Benz, and K. Nylund, “Low Temperature Neutron and Gamma Irradiation of Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites, ” Journal of Nuclear Materials, 115: 11–15, (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. E. Schmunk, G. R. Imel, and Y. O. Harker, “Irradiation Studies of Magnet Insulator Materials, ” Journal of Nuclear Materials, 115: 1115, (1983).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. R. Imel, D. V. Kelsey, and E. H. Ottewitte, “The Effects of Irradiation on TFTR Coil Materials,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, 85–86: 367–71, (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Takamura and T. Kato, “Mechanical Properties of Organic Insulators for Superconducting Magnets After Low Temperature Irradiations,” Paper CP-9 presented at the ICEC Conference, Colorado Springs, CO, August 1983.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takamura and T. Kato, “Low Temperature Irradiation Effects on Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Used in Superconducting Magnets,” Cryogenics, pp. 215–219, (1978).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. R. Coltman, Jr., C. E. Kla8unde, R. H. Kernohan, and C. J. Long, “Effects of Radiation at 5 K on Organic Insulators for Superconducting Magnets, ” IEEE Procedures in Magnetics MAG.-15: 1694–1698, (1979).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. R. Coltman, Jr., and C. E. Klabunde, “Mechanical Strength of Low Temperature Irradiated Polyimides: A Five-to-Ten End Improvement in Dose-Resistance with Epoxies, ” Journal of Nuclear Materials 103–104: 717–722, (1981).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Schmunk and H. Berkel, “Tests in Irradiated Magnet Insulator Materials,” Paper presented at the 3rd Fusion Materials Conference, Albuquerque, NM, (1983).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Schmunk, “Irradiation and Testing of Spaulrad-S for Fusion Magnet Applications,” Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, unpublished manuscript, (1983).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Nishijima, S. Ueta, and T. Okada, “The Effects of Low Temperature Irradiation Effect on the Cryogenic Fatigue Resistance of Epoxy Resin Used in Superconducting Magnets,” Cryogenics pp. 312–313, (1981).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. J. Long, R. Kernohan, and R. R. Coltman, Jr., “Radiation Effects on Insulators for Superconducting Magnets” and “Non Metallic Materials and Composites at Low Temperatures,” A. F. Clark, R. P. Reed, and G. Hartwig (Editors), Plenum, New York (1979), pp. 141153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. D. Henning
    • 1
  1. 1.Magnetic Fusion EnergyLawrence Livermore LaboratoryLivermoreUSA

Personalised recommendations