Strain Resistivity at 4.2 K in Pure Aluminum

  • K. T. Hartwig
  • G. S. Yuan
  • P. Lehmann
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Materials book series (ACRE, volume 32)


Strain induced resistivity increases are examined in pure aluminum under conditions of uniaxial tensile and compressive stress at 4.2 K. Metal studied has an annealed residual resistivity ratio (RRR = ρ273K/ρ4.2K^ covering the range 150 – 7100, is in some cases work hardened prior to testing, and is strained to levels below 10%. Resistivity is monitored during strain by eddy current coils located directly over strain gages bonded to centimeter diameter specimens. We find strain-resistivity to be slightly dependent on purity and similar for tension and compression. For all cases the empirical expression Ap = A (εp) holds for plastic strains (εp) above about 0.1% where A and B are constants. Values of B group around 1.5 for annealed metal and decrease to near 1.15 for the work hardened cases examined.


Plastic Strain Strain Gage Pure Aluminum Empirical Expression Resistivity Increase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. T. Meaden, “Electrical Resistance of Metals,” Plenum Press, New York (1965).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. D. Arp, M. B. Kasen, and R. P. Reed, “Magnetic Energy Storage and Cryogenic Aluminum Magnets,” Technical Report AFAPL-TR-68–87 (Feb. 1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. T. Hartwig, G. S. Yuan, and P. Lehmann, The effects of low temperature fatigue on the RRR and strength of pure aluminum, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-21 (2):161–164 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    “Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage: Basic R&D,” EPRI Research Project RP2572–2 Annual Report (Jan. 1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Lehmann, G. S. Yuan, and K. T. Hartwig, A grip for fatigue testing pure aluminum, Cryogenics 25:164–165 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. F. Clark, V. A. Deason, J. G. Hust, and R. L. Powell, “Standard Reference Materials: The Eddy Current Decay Method for Resistivity Characterization of High Purity Metals,” NBS Special Publication 260–39, National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, Colorado (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. T. Hartwig
    • 1
  • G. S. Yuan
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Lehmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Superconductivity CenterUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.General Research Institute for Non-Ferrous MetalsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations