Abstract
The present-day applied superconductivity is a liquid-helium-based technology. The efficiency of a cryogenic or superconducting device is determined by its rate of consumption of the cryogen. Liquid helium has an extremely small heat of vaporization; thus, its storage almost always requires a state-of-the-art insulating method. Radiation heat leak becomes significantly more important as larger superconducting devices are built, such as huge high-energy physics analysis magnets, fusion reactor systems, and energy storage facilities. For large superconducting magnets,[1–3] it is common practice to surround the liquid helium vessel with a nitrogen shield (at 77 K) and wrap multilayer insulation around both the liquid helium vessel and the nitrogen shield in an attempt to further reduce the heat leaks (Fig. 1a). Multilayer insulation is inexpensive and generally effective; yet, it is a rather difficult material to apply because its performance depends on a few hard-to-control parameters such as the layer density, the compressive loading, and the lateral heat transfer effect. The effective insulation capability obtained in practice is at least a factor of 2 worse than carefully measured laboratory values (or those claimed by manufacturers). Careless and/or inexperienced application can easily generate heat leak values a few times higher than the predicted value, especially when dealing with peculiarly shaped cryostats.
Work sponsored by the U. S. Department of Energy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Abbreviations
- A :
-
= cold surface area
- c :
-
= velocity of light
- C s :
-
= liquid specific heat at saturation
- dm t /dt :
-
= rate of change of mass flow rate
- dp/dt :
-
= rate of change of atmospheric pressure
- E g :
-
= energy gap (threshold)
- ER:
-
= evaporation rate owing to change in atmospheric pressure
- h :
-
= Planck’s constant
- h v :
-
= heat of vaporization
- H c :
-
= critical field of a superconductor
- k :
-
= Boltzmann’s constant
- I :
-
= (C s /V L h v ), (∂T/∂p) sat
- k :
-
= thermal conductivity
- kρ:
-
= thermal conductivity x mass density
- P :
-
= barometric pressure
- \(\dot Q\) :
-
= heat transfer rate
- (RRR) T :
-
= residual resistivity ratio, i.e., ratio of electrical resistivity of a material at room temperature, ρ 300 K, to electrical resistivity of a material at temperature T, ρ T .
- t :
-
= time
- T :
-
= temperature
- T 1 :
-
= 4.2 K (liquid helium temperature)
- T 2 :
-
= 77.4 K (liquid nitrogen temperature)
- T c :
-
= critical temperature of a superconductor
- V :
-
= container volume (liters)
- V L :
-
= volume of liquid involved
- ε 1 :
-
= surface emissivity of the cold surface
- ε 2 :
-
= surface emissivity of the hot surface
- λ :
-
= frequency
- v :
-
= wavelength
- ρ :
-
= electrical resistivity
- (∂T/∂ρ)sat :
-
= slope of the temperature vapor curves
- σ :
-
= Stefan-Boltzmann constant
References
R. C. Niemann, S. T. Wang, W. J. Pelczarski, D. L. Hillis, L. Turner, M. G. Srinivasan, J. R. Purcell, D. B. Montgomery, J. E. C. Williams, A. M. Hatch, P. Marston, P. Smelser, V. B. Zenekevitch, and L. A. Kirjenin, ANL-HEP-CP-76–29 (1976).
J. Pearson, P. Smelser, and R. C. Niemann, “PEP Magnet Design,” ANL internal report (1976).
J. R. Heim, Fermilab TM-591–2750.00 (1975).
K. Kutznar, F. Schmidt, and I. Wietzke, Cryogenics 13:7 (1973).
K. E. Leonhard and E. H. Hyde, Cryogenic Tech. 7(1): 12 (1971).
R. P. Caren and G. R. Cunnington, Chem. Eng. Progr. Symp. Series 64:87 (1968).
R. H. Kropschot, private communication.
R. B. Scott, Cryogenic Engineering, D. Van Nostrand, New York (1959), p. 153.
J. Chaussy, P. Gianese, and J. Peyrand, Cryogenics 16:10 (1976).
M. M. Fulk, M. M. Reynolds, and O. E. Park, in Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York (1960), p. 224.
P. F. Dickson and M. C. Jones, Cryogenics 8(2):24 (1968).
F. J. Zimmerman, J. Appl. Phys. 26(12): 1483 (1955).
J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 108:1175 (1957).
R. H. Kropschot, B. W. Birmingham, and D. B. Mann, Technology of Liquid Helium, NBS Monograph III (1968), p. 164.
K. H. Hawks and W. B. Cottingham, in Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 16, Plenum Press, New York (1970), p. 467.
R. B. Scott, Cryogenic Engineering, D. Van Nostrand, New York (1959),-p. 239.
D. A. Ditamars and G. T. Furukawa, NBS J. Res. 69C(1):35 (1965).
R. Nikolaus, J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP) 24:54(1973).
R. S. Collier, NBS Report 10–749 (1972).
T. von Hoffmann, U. Lienert and H. Quack, Cryogenics 13:490 (1973).
F. R. Fickett, Cryogenics, 11:349 (1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leung, E.M.W., Fast, R.W., Hart, H.L., Heim, J.R. (1980). Techniques for Reducing Radiation Heat Transfer between 77 and 4.2 K. In: Timmerhaus, K.D., Snyder, H.A. (eds) Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, vol 35 A. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9856-1_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9856-1_59
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9858-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9856-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive