Advertisement

Tissue Characterisation Using Acoustic Microscopy

  • D. A. Sinclair
  • I. R. Smith
Part of the Acoustical Imaging book series (ACIM, volume 12)

Abstract

It has been recognised for some time in clinical ultrasound that the speckle-like appearance of regions of relatively homogeneous tissue in B scans can provide significant diagnostic information - particularly in the case of diffuse disease. Improved understanding of the scattering and diffractive processes experienced by an acoustic wave propagating through such tissue regions can be expected to enhance the clinical assessment of the corresponding B scans.

The scanning acoustic microscope provides a suitable method for imaging variations in the acoustic properties of in vitro samples with a resolution comparable to the acoustic wavelength. We discuss here techniques for the derivation of quantitative values for velocity and impedance from acoustic microscope image data. In particular we demonstrate the validity of a paraxial theory of microscope operation and show that enhanced sensitivity can be achieved by careful selection of the microscope coupling liquid. Maps of acoustic velocity and impedance are derived for human liver.

Keywords

Acoustic Velocity Tissue Characterisation Acoustic Microscope Half Wavelength Scanning Acoustic Microscope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. D. Bennett, “Coherent Techniques in Acoustic Microscopy”, PhD Thesis, University of London (1980).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. D. Bennett, “Approximate Materials Characterisation using Coherent Acoustic Microscopy”, (1981) unpublished.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. A. Sinclair and I. R. Smith, “Tissue Characterisation using Scanning Acoustic Microscopy”, Proc 6th Int. Symposium on Ultrasonic Imaging and Tissue Characterisation”, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA (1981), published in Ultrasonic Imaging 2:4 p44–46 (1981).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. A. Sinclair, I. R Smith and H. K. Wickramasinghe, “Recent Developments in Scanning Acoustic Microscopy”, The Radio and Electronic Engineer, 52:10 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. F. Quate, A. Atalar and H. K. Wickramasinghe, “Acoustic Microscopy with Mechanical Scanning - A Review”, Proc. IEEE SU 67:8, p 1092–1114 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. C. Gregg and G. L. Palagallo, “Acoustic Impedance of Tissue”, Invest. Radiolo 4, p 357–363 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. P. Jones, “Impediography: a new ultrasound technique for Diagnostic Medicine”, in “Ultrasound in Medicine”, ed. D.N. White, 1, 489–97, Plenum Press (1975)0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. A. Goss, R. L. Johnston and F. Dunn, “Comprehensive compilation of Empirical Ultrasonic Properties of Mammalian Tissues”, JASA 64:2, p 423–457 (1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. R. Hill, Ro W0 Huggins and D. Nicholas, “Scattering of Ultrasound by Human Tissues”, in “Ultrasound: its Applications in Medicine and Biology”, ed0 F.J. Fry, ch 9, Elsevier (1978).Google Scholar
  10. O F Lizzi and D. J. Coleman, “Ultrasonic Spectral Analysis in Opthalmology”, in “Recent Advances in Ultrasound and Biomedicine”, ed. D.N. White, 1, Research Studies Press (1977).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. D. Bennett and E. A. Ash, “Differential Imaging with the Acoustic Microscope”, IEEE Trans. on Sonics and Ultrasonics, SU 28:2 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Sinclair
    • 1
  • I. R. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronic and Electrical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations