Abstract
The atypical, paradoxical, and contradictory data introduced by the blind study forced the recognition that the blurring-speed methodology was unstable, and that the existing blurring-speed-dyslexic conceptualizations were incomplete and thus dependent upon unknown variables. In an attempt to integrate and harmonize the blind blurring-speed correlations with the Staten Island and Queens findings, the author assumed that all of the data was of equal validity, and that all “paradoxical” data must be due to unique and distinct combinations of overlapping variables and determinants stemming from a common, but hidden, nuclear source.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levinson, H.N. (1980). Compensatory Tracking and Reading Scores in Dyslexia. In: A Solution to the Riddle Dyslexia. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9774-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9774-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9776-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9774-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive