Skip to main content

Testing Hypothesis Methods

  • Chapter
Book cover ARMA Model Identification

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Statistics ((SSS))

  • 475 Accesses

Abstract

Historically speaking, the hypothesis testing methods had been dominantly used to choose tentative ARMA models until Box-Jenkins’ identification method appeared. Nowadays they are primarily used for testing model inadequacy after choosing the orders and estimating the parameters, which Box and Jenkins (1976) called the model diagnostic checking. Therefore, we discuss them in this final chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Additional References

  1. For more details about the Wald, the LR, and the LM tests, readers may refer to Breusch and Pagan (1980), Berndt and Savin (1977), Engle (1984), and the references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  2. About the singularity problem of overparameteriza- tion of the ARMA model, refer to Godfrey (1978a), Breusch (1978), Shibata (1986), and Veres (1987). Poskitt and TYemayne (1980) presented a ridge-regression type LM test of Ho against HC.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For ARMA modeling methods utilizing Kolmogorov’s identity, refer to Cameron (1978), Milhoj (1981), Saikkonen (1983), Pham (1986, 1987), and the references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  4. About the performance of the Qm and the Qm statistics, refer to Prothero and Wallis (1976), Davies and Newbold (1979), Ansley and Newbold (1979), Godolphin (1980b), and Clarke and Godolphin (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. The equivalence of the portmanteau statistic and the LM statistic is also shown by Newbold (1980) and Poskitt and TVemayne (1981b, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Applied Probability Trust

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Choi, B. (1992). Testing Hypothesis Methods. In: ARMA Model Identification. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9745-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9745-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9747-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9745-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics