A Response Time Theory of Perceptual Independence

  • F. Gregory Ashby
  • W. Todd Maddox
Part of the Recent Research in Psychology book series (PSYCHOLOGY)

Abstract

A response time theory of perceptual independence is developed by incorporating an assumption, called the RT-distance hypothesis, into the framework of general recognition theory (Ashby & Townsend, 1986). The RT-distance hypothesis states that response time is inversely related to the distance from the perceptual representation of a stimulus to the nearest decision bound. Two new experimental paradigms are proposed and response time tests of perceptual independence that utilize these paradigms are developed. An empirical application validates one of these tests. Methods for examining aspects of the underlying perceptual distributions are also discussed.

Keywords

Covariance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashby, F.G. (1988). Estimating the parameters of multidimensional signal detection theory from simultaneous ratings on separate stimulus components. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby, F.G. (1989). Stochastic general recognition theory. In D. Vickers and P.L. Smith (eds.) Human Information Processing: Measures, Mechanisms, and Models. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
  3. Ashby, F.G. & Gott, R. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashby, F.G. & Maddox, W.T. (1990). Integrating information from separable psychological dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 598–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashby, F.G. & Townsend, J.T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bindra, D., Donderi, D.C., & Nishiato, S. (1968). Decision latency of “same”-“different” judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bindra, D., Williams, J.A., & Wise, J.S. (1965). Judgments of sameness and difference: Experiments on decision time. Science, 150, 1625–1627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blakemore, C., Carpenter, R.H.S., & Georgeson, M.A. (1970). Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system. Nature, 228, 37–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bornstein, M.H., & Monroe, M.D. (1980). Chromatic information processing: Rate depends on stimulus location in the category and psychological complexity. Psychological Research, 42, 213 – 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cartwright, D. (1941). Relation of decision-time to the categories of response. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 174–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emmerich, D.S., Gray, C.S., Watson, C.S., & Tanis, D.C. (1972). Response latency, confidence and ROCs in auditory signal detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garner, W.R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Garner, W.R., & Felfoldy, G.L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garner, W.R., & Morton, J. (1969). Perceptual independence: Definitions, models and experimental paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 233–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A. (1967). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Kadlec, H., & Townsend, J.T. (in press). Signal detection analysis of dimensional interactions. In F.G. Ashby (ed.) Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Kantowitz, B.H. (1974). Double stimulation. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 83–132). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Luce, R.D. (1986). Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Moss, S.M., Myers, J.L., & Filmore, T. (1970). Short-term recognition memory of tones. Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murdock, B.B. Jr. (1985). An analysis of the strength-latency relationship. Memory & Cognition, 13, 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murdock, B.B. Jr., & Anderson, R.E. (1975). Encoding, storage, and retrieval of item information. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Norman, D.A., & Wickeigren, W.A. (1969). Strength theory and decision rules and latency in retrieval from short-term memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 192–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oilman, R. (1966). Fast guesses in choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 6, 155–156.Google Scholar
  24. Peterson, W.W., Birdsall, T.G., & Fox, W.C. (1954). The theory of signal detectability. Trans. IRE Professional Group on Information theory, PGIT-4, 171–212.Google Scholar
  25. Podgorny, P., & Shepard, R.N. (1978). Functional representations common to visual perception and imagination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 21–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Posner, M.I. (1964). Information reduction in the analysis of sequential tasks. Psychological Review, 71, 491–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reed, C. (1990). Interaction between the dimensions of haptically explored objects. Doctoral Dissertation (in progress).Google Scholar
  28. Rossmeissl, P.G., Theios, J., & Krunnfusz, D. (1979). Parallel processing models for joint visual and memory scanning. Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Mathematical Psychology Meetings, Brown University, August, 1979.Google Scholar
  29. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 83, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shepard, R.N., & Teghtsoonian, M. (1962). Retention of information under conditions approaching a steady state. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, E.E. (1968). Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 77–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swensson, R.G. (1972). The elusive tradeoff: Speed versus accuracy in visual discrimination tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tanner, W.P., Jr. (1956). Theory of recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 1233–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas, E.A.C. (1971). Sufficient conditions for monotone hazard rate: An application to latency-probability curves. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas, E.A.C. & Myers, J.L. (1972). Implications of listing data for threshold and nonthreshold models of signal detection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 9, 253–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomas, J.P., & Gille, J. (1979). Bandwidths of orientation channels in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 652–660.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Townsend, J.T. (1990). The truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: Toward a theory of hierarchical inference. Psychological Bulletin, in press.Google Scholar
  39. Townsend, J.T., & Ashby, F.G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Walsh, J.E. (1965). Handbook of nonparametric statistics. New York: Van Nostrand, II.Google Scholar
  41. Wickelgren, W.A. (1968). Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 5, 102–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wickelgren, W.A., & Norman, D.A. (1966). Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 316–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wickens, T. & Olzak, L. (in press). Three views of association in concurrent detection ratings. In F.G. Ashby (ed.) Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Yellott, J.I. (1967). Correction for guessing in choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 8, 321–322.Google Scholar
  45. Yellott, J.I. (1971). Correction for guessing and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 159–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Gregory Ashby
    • 1
  • W. Todd Maddox
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations