Abstract
Finite state test theory provides equations for the probability of every response outcome that occurs under any format of administration of an objective test. By changing the assumptions about item characteristics and examinee response behavior, different models realizing the theory can be set each of which prescribes a different scoring formula. Since the assumptions that apply best to a real testing situation are not always known in advance, the appropriateness of each of a set of models needs to be determined, in order to decide on the way the test should be scored. This paper presents a method on which to base this decision. Responses to items which had ‘none of the above’ as an option are used to illustrate it. Several models are put forth which make different assumptions as to item characteristics and examinee response behavior. The fit of data to the predicted theoretical relationships among response outcomes is the criterion for deciding on the most suitable finite state model. This procedure for determining the fit of data to each of a set of finite state models forms the basis for choosing item characteristic curves for use with finite state poiynomic IRT models.
Work on this paper was supported by the Centra de Investigadón y Documentaclón Educativa, Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cressie, N. & Read, T.R.C. (1984). Multinomial goodness-of-fit statistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 46, 440–464.
Frary, R.B. (1980). The effect of misinformation, partial information, and guessing on expected multiple-choice test item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 79–90.
García-Pérez, M.A. (1987). A finite state theory of performance in multiple-choice tests. In E.E. Roskam & R. Suck (Eds.) Progress in Mathematical Psychology-I. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 455–464.
García-Pérez, M.A. (1989a). La correctión del azar en pruebas objetivas: Un enfoque basado en una nueva teoría de estados finitos. Investigaciones Psicológicas, 6, 33–62.
García-Pérez, M.A. (1989b). Item sampling, guessing, partial information, and decisionmaking in achievement testing. In E.E. Roskam (Ed.) Mathematical Psychology in Progress. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 249–265.
García-Pérez, M.A. (1990). A comparison of two models of performance in objective tests: Finite states versus continuous distributions. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 73–91.
Garcia-Pérez, M.A. & Frary, R.B. (1989). Psychometric properties of finite-state scores versus number-correct and formula scores: A simulation study. Applied Psychological Measurement, 73, 403–417.
García-Pérez, M.A. & Frary, R.B. (1990). Finite state polynomic item characteristic curves. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Haladyna, T.M. & Downing, S.M. (1989). A taxonomy of multiple-choice item-writing rules. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 37–50.
Read, T.R.C. & Cressie, N.A.C. (1988). Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Data. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
García-Pérez, M.A., Frary, R.B. (1991). Testing Finite State Models of Performance in Objective Tests Using Items with ‘None of the Above’ as an Option. In: Doignon, JP., Falmagne, JC. (eds) Mathematical Psychology. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9728-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9728-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97665-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9728-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive