Advertisement

For a Materialist Psychology

  • Charles W. Tolman
Conference paper
Part of the Recent Research in Psychology book series (PSYCHOLOGY)

Summary

We believe our bodies to be real and natural, that they exist in a particular way in objective time and space without our having to think about them, and that if we collectively put our minds to the task, we can know and understand them as they actually function, just as we know the world in which it all takes place. In short, when we examine the assumptions underlying common everyday existence and action we discover something very close to the assumptions of philosophical materialism. It is important to emphasize that materialism does not deny the mental or spiritual aspects of our lives. The mental is regarded as fully real, but the material is prior. This priority, however, must be understood developmentally. It is certainly not the case that thoughts never precede or have effects upon material processes. On the contrary, thoughts and other mental phenomena almost always affect material processes. But these same mental processes have their ultimate origin in material, usually biological processes. They are themselves material processes of a developmentally special kind.

Keywords

Mental Phenomenon Methodological Implication Spiritual Aspect Individual Thing Materialist Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cornforth, M. (1971). Materialism and the dialectical method. New York: International Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Davydov, V. V. (1984). Substantial generalization and the dialectical materialistic theory of thinking. In M. Hedegaard, P. Hakkarainen, & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Learning and teaching on a scientific basis (pp. 11–32). Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.Google Scholar
  3. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubrovsky, D. (1988). The problem of the ideal. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Engestrom, Y., Hakkarainen, P., & Hedegaard, M. (1984). On the methodological basis of research in teaching and learning. In M. Hedegaard, P. Hakkarainen, & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Learning and teaching on a scientific basis (pp. 119–190). Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet.Google Scholar
  6. English, H. B., & English, A. C. (1958). A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytic term. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
  7. Gorsky, D. (1987). Generalisation and cognition. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Hegel’s logic. (W. Wallace, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hilgard, E. R., & Bower, G. H. (1966). Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  10. Ilyenkov, E. B. (1982a). Leninist dialectics and the metaphysics of positivism. London: New Park Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1982b). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). The concept of the ideal. In Fedoseyev, et al. (Eds.), Philosophy in the USSR: problems of dialectical materialism. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Jantzen, W. (in press). The evolution of subjective sense. Activity theory.Google Scholar
  14. Kharin, Y. A. (1981). Fundamentals of dialectics. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Konstantinov, F. V., et al. (Eds.). (1982). The fundamentals of Marxist- Leninist philosophy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Lektorsky, V. A. (1984). Subject, object, cognition. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Lenin, V. I. (1976). Philosophical notebooks (Collected works, Vol. 38). Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Leontyev, A. N. (1979). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 40–71). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Leontyev, A. N. (1981). Theproblem of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Marquit, E. (1982). Contradictions in dialectics and formal logic. In E. Marquit, P. Moran, & W. H. Truitt (Eds.), Dialectical contradictions: contemporary Marxist discussions. Minneapolis: Marxist Educational Press.Google Scholar
  21. Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse (M. Nicolaus, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  22. Natelov, I. (1984). Alternatives to positivism. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Selsam, H., & Martel, H. (1963). Reader in Marxist philosophy. New York: International Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Tolman, C. W. (1989). Pluralistic monism: William James as closet- Heraclitean. Psychological Record, 39, 177–194.Google Scholar
  25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles W. Tolman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations