Turbulent Reactive Flows pp 242-256 | Cite as

# Length and Time Scales in Turbulent Combustion

## Abstract

- 1.
the regime of wrinkled flamelets,

- 2.
the regime of corrugated flamelets,

- 3.
the regime of distributed reaction zones and

- 4.
the regime of the well-stirred reactor.

While the first and fourth regime, representing limiting conditions, have been analysed in the past rather successfully, the second and third regime describe a more intense interaction between turbulence and combustion. Using arguments based on Kolmogorov’s energy cascade, a new length scale is identified in each of these two intermediate regimes.

In the regime of corrugated flamelets, the Gibson scale \( {{\rm{L}}_{\rm{G}}} = {\rm{v}}_{\rm{F}}^{3/{\rm{\varepsilon }}} \) is derived. Here v_{F} is the flame veloCity which by definition is equal to the characteristic turn-over veloCity of the eddy of size L_{G}. Eddies much larger than L_{G} which have a larger turn-over veloCity than v_{F} will convect the flame front within the flow field as if it was a passive surface. Eddies much smaller than L_{G}, having a smaller turn-over veloCity than v_{F}, are consumed by the flame front very rapidly and therefore cannot corrugate the front. The Gibson scale therefore is the lower cut-off of all scales that appear in the corrugated flame surface.

In the regime of distributed reaction zones the mean turbulent flame thickness is of the order of the quench scale δ_{q}, which is predicted to be proportional to \( {\left( {{\rm{\varepsilon t}}_{\rm{q}}^3} \right)^{1/2}} \), where t_{q}=1/a_{q} is the quench time, a_{q} is the stretch rate at quenching of a premixed flame and ε the dissipation of turbulence. The quench scale presents the largest eddy within the inertial range, which is still able to quench the thin inner reaction zone of a premixed flame. Smaller eddies, inducing a larger stretch, will quench this thin layer more readily and therefore will try to homogenize the scalar field locally. Therefore a thickened flame front will appear. Larger eddies, inducing a weaker stretch that will not be able to quench the inner reaction zones, will only wrinkle this thickened flame front.

### Keywords

Combustion Enthalpy Hydrocarbon Convolution Meso## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- /1/.Peters, N., Williams, F.A.: Combust. Flame 68, 185 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- /2/.Williams, F.A.: Combustion Theory, 2nd Edition, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, 1985.Google Scholar
- /3/.Buckmaster, J.D., Ludford, G.S.S.: Theory of laminar flames, Cambridge University Press, 1982.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- /4/.Karlovitz, B., Denniston, D.K., Knappschafer, D.H., Wells, F.E.: 4th Symposium (International) on Combustion, p. 163, The Combustion Institute, 1953.Google Scholar
- /5/.Sivashinsky,G.L: Acta Astronautica 3, 889(1976).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- /6/.Buckmaster, J.: 17th Symposium (International) on Combustion, p. 835, The Combustion Institute, 1979.Google Scholar
- /7/.Bray, K.N.C.: Turbulent Flows with Premixed React ants, Turbulent Reacting Flows, P. A. Libby, F.A. Williams (Eds.), p. 115, Springer, Berlin, 1980.Google Scholar
- /8/.Borghi, R.: On the structure of turbulent premixed flames, Recent Advances in Aeronautical Science, C. Bruno, C. Casci (Eds.), Pergamon, 1984.Google Scholar
- /9/.Clavin, P.: Progr. Energy Combust. Sci. 11, 1 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- /10/.Namazian, M., Shepherd, I.G., Talbot, L.: Combust. Flame 64, 299 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- /11/.Ashurst,W.T., Barr, P.K.: Combust. Sci. Technol. 34, 227(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- /12/.Baritaud, T.A., Green, R.M.: SAE-paper 860025(1986).Google Scholar
- /13/.zur Loye, A.O., Bracco, F.V.: International Symposium on Diagnostics and Modeling of Combustion in Reciprocating Engines, Tokyo, p. 249, 1985.Google Scholar
- /14/.Kolmogorov, A.N.: 3. Fluid Mech. 13, 82(1962).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- /15/.Abraham, X, Williams, F.A., Bracco, F.V.: SAE-paper 850345(1985).Google Scholar